Research
Funding grant proposals for scientific research: retrospective analysis of scores by members of grant review panel
BMJ 2011; 343 doi: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.d4797 (Published 27 September 2011) Cite this as: BMJ 2011;343:d4797
Data supplement
Web Extra
Extra material supplied by the author
Files in this Data Supplement:
- Data Supplement - Project grant funding process of National Health and Medical Research Council of Australia
- Data Supplement - Explanation of non-parametric bootstrap procedure
Web Extra
Extra material supplied by the author
Files in this Data Supplement:
- Data Supplement - Project grant funding process of National Health and Medical Research Council of Australia
- Data Supplement - Explanation of non-parametric bootstrap procedure
Web Extra
Extra material supplied by the author
Files in this Data Supplement:
- Data Supplement - Project grant funding process of National Health and Medical Research Council of Australia
- Data Supplement - Explanation of non-parametric bootstrap procedure
Related articles
- PAPERS Published: 02 March 2004; BMJ doi:10.1136/bmj.38023.700775.AE
- Paper Published: 18 March 2004; BMJ 328 doi:10.1136/bmj.38023.700775.AE
See more
- Seven days in medicine: 10-16 July 2019BMJ July 18, 2019, 366 l4712; DOI: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.l4712
- Costs of preventable harm could pay for thousands of nurses, BMJ study findsBMJ July 17, 2019, 366 l4722; DOI: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.l4722
- Preventable harm: getting the measure rightBMJ July 17, 2019, 366 l4611; DOI: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.l4611
- Prevalence, severity, and nature of preventable patient harm across medical care settings: systematic review and meta-analysisBMJ July 17, 2019, 366 l4185; DOI: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.l4185
- Should obesity be recognised as a disease?BMJ July 17, 2019, 366 l4258; DOI: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.l4258
Cited by...
- Assessment of potential bias in research grant peer review in Canada
- Low agreement among reviewers evaluating the same NIH grant applications
- Research Funding: the Case for a Modified Lottery
- Predicting Productivity Returns on Investment: Thirty Years of Peer Review, Grant Funding, and Publication of Highly Cited Papers at the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute
- Using simplified peer review processes to fund research: a prospective study
- Percentile Ranking and Citation Impact of a Large Cohort of National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute-Funded Cardiovascular R01 Grants
- On the time spent preparing grant proposals: an observational study of Australian researchers