Jonathan A C Sterne, Alex J Sutton, John P A Ioannidis, Norma Terrin, David R Jones, Joseph Lau et al
Sterne J A C, Sutton A J, Ioannidis J P A, Terrin N, Jones D R, Lau J et al.
Recommendations for examining and interpreting funnel plot asymmetry in meta-analyses of randomised controlled trials
BMJ 2011; 343 :d4002
doi:10.1136/bmj.d4002
Interpreting funnel plots: does the example clarify the problem?
In educational articles aimed at very specialised statistical
issues, the choice of a clear example is a crucial point to help readers
understand the main message conveyed by the paper.
In the article by Sterne et al. [1], understanding Figure 2 is
essential, but it is unclear why three subgroups of studies (subgroups 1,
2 and 3) are proposed to interpret the results of the meta-analysis taken
as an example, whereas one could think that two subgroups are enough
(subgroups 1 and 2 pooled together vs. subgroup 3).
References
1. Sterne JAC, Sutton AJ, Ioannidis JPA, et al. Recommendations for
examining and interpreting funnel plot asymmetry in meta-analyses of
randomised controlled trials. BMJ 2011; 343:d4002
Competing interests: No competing interests