Rapid responses are electronic comments to the editor. They enable our users
to debate issues raised in articles published on bmj.com. A rapid response
is first posted online. If you need the URL (web address) of an individual
response, simply click on the response headline and copy the URL from the
browser window. A proportion of responses will, after editing, be published
online and in the print journal as letters, which are indexed in PubMed.
Rapid responses are not indexed in PubMed and they are not journal articles.
The BMJ reserves the right to remove responses which are being
wilfully misrepresented as published articles or when it is brought to our
attention that a response spreads misinformation.
From March 2022, the word limit for rapid responses will be 600 words not
including references and author details. We will no longer post responses
that exceed this limit.
The word limit for letters selected from posted responses remains 300 words.
The study design was a case series: Andrew Wakefield and colleagues
did not state a hypothesis and case series studies are neither required
nor expected to state one. The purpose of a case series is to generate new
hypotheses about potential causation: it is not designed to investigate
possible causality. I am surprised and disappointed that the authors still
seem confused on this point.
The Lancet paper was hypothesis generating: an association between
the MMR vaccine and childhood autism was not "reported" in 'that paper'
published in the Lancet. In 'that paper' the Royal Free researchers had
written,
"We did not prove an association between measles, mumps and rubella
vaccine and the syndrome described" ... (page 641, paragraph 2).
and,
"Further investigations are needed to examine this syndrome and its
possible relation to the vaccine" (page 641, paragraph 5)".
[1] Wakefield AJ, Murch SH, Anthony A, Linnell J, Casson DM, Malik M,
et al. Ileal lymphoid nodular hyperplasia, non-specific colitis, and
pervasive developmental disorder in children [retracted]: Lancet 1998;
351:637-41.
The vital need for accuracy in reporting
The study design was a case series: Andrew Wakefield and colleagues
did not state a hypothesis and case series studies are neither required
nor expected to state one. The purpose of a case series is to generate new
hypotheses about potential causation: it is not designed to investigate
possible causality. I am surprised and disappointed that the authors still
seem confused on this point.
The Lancet paper was hypothesis generating: an association between
the MMR vaccine and childhood autism was not "reported" in 'that paper'
published in the Lancet. In 'that paper' the Royal Free researchers had
written,
"We did not prove an association between measles, mumps and rubella
vaccine and the syndrome described" ... (page 641, paragraph 2).
and,
"Further investigations are needed to examine this syndrome and its
possible relation to the vaccine" (page 641, paragraph 5)".
[1] Wakefield AJ, Murch SH, Anthony A, Linnell J, Casson DM, Malik M,
et al. Ileal lymphoid nodular hyperplasia, non-specific colitis, and
pervasive developmental disorder in children [retracted]: Lancet 1998;
351:637-41.
Competing interests: No competing interests