Rapid responses are electronic letters to the editor. They enable our users to debate issues raised in articles published on thebmj.com. Although a selection of rapid responses will be included online and in print as readers' letters, their first appearance online means that they are published articles. If you need the url (web address) of an individual response, perhaps for citation purposes, simply click on the response headline and copy the url from the browser window. Letters are indexed in PubMed.
A north-London GP, Fred Kavalier thinks he's "more honest than most
homeopaths". Of course, Dr Kavalier may be more honest than many other
Take, for example, the great cholesterol fandango and those primary
care doctors who enthusiastically dance to the financially exciting
rhythms of the QOF. Once started there is really no indication to stop
them: the statins have proved to be the biggest money-spinning pills the
world of medicine has ever known.
But against all the prevailing evidence, many GPs continue to
prescribe statins like sherbet lemons, to anyone and everyone with a
cholesterol level - and despite the evidence that the modest benefit in
secondary prevention is independent of the cholesterol-lowering effect.
I am beginning to suspect that the pharmacy sale of a little box of
"sucrose/lactose pillules" involves a whole lot less evidence-based
deception than the flogging of the primary-preventing sherbet lemon.
 Statins: use them or lose them. Debate about the benefits and
harms of statins on Channel 4 News between Lawrence Buckman, GPC Chairman,
and John Briffa. January 2011. http://bcove.me/pn8kvruf