Angiotensin receptor blockers and risk of myocardial infarction: meta-analyses and trial sequential analyses of 147 020 patients from randomised trialsBMJ 2011; 342 doi: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.d2234 (Published 26 April 2011) Cite this as: BMJ 2011;342:d2234
- Sripal Bangalore, director of research1, assistant professor of medicine2,
- Sunil Kumar, fellow in cardiovascular medicine3,
- Jørn Wetterslev, chief physician4,
- Franz H Messerli, director, hypertension program; professor of clinical medicine5
- 1Cardiac Catheterization Laboratory, New York University School of Medicine, Leon H Charney Division of Cardiology, New York, NY 10016, United States
- 2New York University School of Medicine, Leon H Charney Division of Cardiology, New York
- 3University of Nebraska, Omaha, Nebraska
- 4Copenhagen Trial Unit, Center for Clinical Intervention Research, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen University Hospital, Denmark
- 5St Luke’s Roosevelt Hospital and Columbia University, New York
- Correspondence to: S Bangalore
- Accepted 1 March 2011
Objectives To evaluate the cardiovascular outcomes and other outcomes associated with angiotensin receptor blockers.
Design Systematic review of randomised controlled trials with meta-analysis and trial sequential analysis (TSA).
Data sources and study selection Pubmed, Embase, and CENTRAL searches for randomised clinical trials, until August 2010, of angiotensin receptor blockers compared with controls (placebo/active treatment) that enrolled at least 100 participants and had a follow-up of at least one year.
Data extraction Myocardial infarction, death, cardiovascular death, angina pectoris, stroke, heart failure, and new onset diabetes.
Results 37 randomised clinical trials included 147 020 participants and had a total follow-up of 485 166 patient years. When compared with controls (placebo/active treatment), placebo, or active treatment, angiotensin receptor blockers were not associated with an increase in the risk of myocardial infarction (relative risk 0.99, 95% confidence interval 0.92 to 1.07), death, cardiovascular death, or angina pectoris. Compared with controls, angiotensin receptor blockers were associated with a reduction in the risk of stroke (0.90, 0.84 to 0.98), heart failure (0.87, 0.81 to 0.93), and new onset diabetes (0.85, 0.78 to 0.93), with similar results when compared with placebo or with active treatment. Based on trial sequential analysis, there is no evidence even for an average 5.0-7.5% (upper confidence interval 5-11%) relative increase in myocardial infarction (absolute increase of 0.3%), death, or cardiovascular death with firm evidence for relative risk reduction of stroke (at least 1%, average 10%) (compared with placebo only), heart failure (at least 5%, average 10%), and new onset diabetes (at least 4%, average 10%) with angiotensin receptor blockers compared with controls.
Conclusions This large and comprehensive analysis produced firm evidence to refute the hypothesis that angiotensin receptor blockers increase the risk of myocardial infarction (ruling out even a 0.3% absolute increase). Compared with controls, angiotensin receptor blockers reduce the risk of stroke, heart failure, and new onset diabetes.
Contributors: SB is guarantor. SB and FHM were responsible for study concept and design and supervised the study. SB and SK acquired the data, which was analysed and interpreted by SB, JW, and FHM. SB drafted the manuscript, which was critically revised for important intellectual content by SB, SK, JW, and FHM. SB and JW did the statistical analysis.
Funding: This research received no specific grant from any funding agency in the public, commercial, or not-for-profit sectors.
Competing interests: All authors have completed the Unified Competing Interest form at www.icmje.org/coi_disclosure.pdf (available available on request from the corresponding author) and declare: no support from any organisation for the submitted work; FHM has been an occasional consultant/speaker for Novartis, Daiichi Sankyo, Sanofi, and Savient Pharmaceuticals and has received grants from Novartis, Forest, and Boehringer Ingelheim; no other relationships or activities that could appear to have influenced the submitted work.
Ethical approval: Not required.
Data sharing: No additional data available.
This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-commercial License, which permits use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non commercial and is otherwise in compliance with the license. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/2.0/ and http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/2.0/legalcode.