Editorials
Wakefield’s article linking MMR vaccine and autism was fraudulent
BMJ 2011; 342 doi: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.c7452 (Published 06 January 2011) Cite this as: BMJ 2011;342:c7452
Related articles
- Feature Published: 06 January 2011; BMJ 342 doi:10.1136/bmj.c5347
- Editor's Choice Published: 06 January 2011; BMJ 342 doi:10.1136/bmj.d22
- Primary Care Published: 24 August 2002; BMJ 325 doi:10.1136/bmj.325.7361.419
- Education And Debate Published: 01 July 2004; BMJ 329 doi:10.1136/bmj.329.7456.41
- Paper Published: 16 February 2002; BMJ 324 doi:10.1136/bmj.324.7334.393
- Correction Published: 15 March 2011; BMJ 342 doi:10.1136/bmj.d1678
- News Published: 29 March 2011; BMJ 342 doi:10.1136/bmj.d2010
- Practice Published: 04 October 2011; BMJ 343 doi:10.1136/bmj.d5703
- News Published: 06 August 2012; BMJ 345 doi:10.1136/bmj.e5328
- News Published: 14 September 2012; BMJ 345 doi:10.1136/bmj.e6220
- Views & Reviews Published: 10 September 2019; BMJ 366 doi:10.1136/bmj.l5477
See more
- Commentary: I see no convincing evidence of “enterocolitis,” “colitis,” or a “unique disease process”BMJ November 09, 2011, 343 d6985; DOI: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.d6985
- Institutional research misconductBMJ November 09, 2011, 343 d7284; DOI: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.d7284
- Pathology reports solve “new bowel disease” riddleBMJ November 09, 2011, 343 d6823; DOI: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.d6823
- Commentary: We came to an overwhelming and uniform opinion that these reports do not show colitisBMJ November 09, 2011, 343 d6979; DOI: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.d6979
- Is research safe in their hands?BMJ January 19, 2011, 342 d284; DOI: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.d284
Cited by...
- Bias, precision and timeliness of historical (background) rate comparison methods for vaccine safety monitoring: an empirical multi-database analysis
- Moral obligations in conducting stem cell-based therapy trials for autism spectrum disorder
- You are what you read: bias, journal prestige and manipulation
- Frauds in scientific research and how to possibly overcome them
- "Ive never heard of anyone die of measles..."
- Taking stock of vaccine hesitancy among migrants: a scoping review protocol
- Helen Salisbury: Trust and truth telling
- The anti-vaccination debate and the microbiome: How paradigm shifts in the life sciences create new challenges for the vaccination debate
- Mumps presenting with unilateral, synchronous parotid and submandibular gland swelling
- Vaccinating in the age of apathy: measles vaccination in Canada, 1963-1998
- The Cochrane Collaboration withdraws a review on methylphenidate for adults with attention deficit hyperactivity disorder
- Technology Transfer: From the Research Bench to Commercialization: Part 2: The Commercialization Process
- The science of paediatrics, child health research, and the Royal College of Paediatrics and Child Health
- Who needs a shot ... a review of tetanus immunity in the West of Ireland
- University College London issues new research standards but says it won't investigate Wakefield
- Stopping the Chain of Infection in the Radiology Suite
- Texas judge throws out Wakefield's libel action against BMJ
- Ultrasound and Autism: Association, Link, or Coincidence?
- The Legitimacy of Vaccine Critics: What Is Left after the Autism Hypothesis?
- Institutional research misconduct
- Pathology reports solve "new bowel disease" riddle
- Vaccination: A Public Health Intervention That Changed History & Is Changing with History
- Improving MMR vaccination rates: herd immunity is a realistic goal
- The Inside Scoop on the Wakefield Fiasco
- UCL's response