Feature
Secrets of the MMR scare
How the case against the MMR vaccine was fixed
BMJ 2011; 342 doi: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.c5347 (Published 06 January 2011) Cite this as: BMJ 2011;342:c5347
Data supplement
Web Extra
Tables contrasting the Wakefield et al paper with NHS records of patient diagnoses and histories
Files in this Data Supplement:
Related articles
- Editorial Published: 06 January 2011; BMJ 342 doi:10.1136/bmj.c7452
- Feature Published: 11 January 2011; BMJ 342 doi:10.1136/bmj.c5258
- Feature Published: 18 January 2011; BMJ 342 doi:10.1136/bmj.c7001
- Views & Reviews Published: 18 January 2011; BMJ 342 doi:10.1136/bmj.d236
- Editor's Choice Published: 06 January 2011; BMJ 342 doi:10.1136/bmj.d22
- News Published: 29 March 2011; BMJ 342 doi:10.1136/bmj.d2010
- Views & Reviews Published: 29 March 2011; BMJ 342 doi:10.1136/bmj.d2006
- Editorial Published: 09 November 2011; BMJ 343 doi:10.1136/bmj.d7284
- News Published: 14 March 2012; BMJ 344 doi:10.1136/bmj.e2051
- News Published: 06 August 2012; BMJ 345 doi:10.1136/bmj.e5328
- News Published: 14 September 2012; BMJ 345 doi:10.1136/bmj.e6220
- Letter Published: 08 February 2011; BMJ 342 doi:10.1136/bmj.d812
- Feature Published: 06 July 2015; BMJ 351 doi:10.1136/bmj.h3660
See more
- Commentary: I see no convincing evidence of “enterocolitis,” “colitis,” or a “unique disease process”BMJ November 09, 2011, 343 d6985; DOI: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.d6985
- Institutional research misconductBMJ November 09, 2011, 343 d7284; DOI: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.d7284
- Pathology reports solve “new bowel disease” riddleBMJ November 09, 2011, 343 d6823; DOI: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.d6823
- Commentary: We came to an overwhelming and uniform opinion that these reports do not show colitisBMJ November 09, 2011, 343 d6979; DOI: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.d6979
- Is research safe in their hands?BMJ January 19, 2011, 342 d284; DOI: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.d284
Cited by...
- When null hypothesis significance testing is unsuitable for research: a reassessment
- Sackler Colloquium on Improving the Reproducibility of Scientific Research: Crisis or self-correction: Rethinking media narratives about the well-being of science
- Maternal Influenza Vaccination and Autism Risk
- How do authors of systematic reviews deal with research malpractice and misconduct in original studies? A cross-sectional analysis of systematic reviews and survey of their authors
- Some State Vaccination Laws Contribute To Greater Exemption Rates And Disease Outbreaks In The United States
- Investments in respiratory infectious disease research 1997-2010: a systematic analysis of UK funding
- Is an adult with Asperger syndrome sitting in your waiting room?
- A BMJ for the United States
- University College London issues new research standards but says it won't investigate Wakefield
- Texas judge throws out Wakefield's libel action against BMJ
- Reflections on US Immunization Challenges: Lady Montague, Where Are You?
- Institutional research misconduct
- Vaccination: A Public Health Intervention That Changed History & Is Changing with History
- The fraud squad
- Measles outbreak in Europe
- Science matters
- The Inside Scoop on the Wakefield Fiasco
- Are the GMC, news media, and BMJ the right tribunals?
- How campaigners and the media push bad science
- Assuring research integrity in the wake of Wakefield
- The Lancet's two days to bury bad news
- Wakefield's article linking MMR vaccine and autism was fraudulent