Rapid responses are electronic comments to the editor. They enable our users to debate issues raised in articles published on bmj.com. A rapid response is first posted online. If you need the URL (web address) of an individual response, simply click on the response headline and copy the URL from the browser window. A proportion of responses will, after editing, be published online and in the print journal as letters, which are indexed in PubMed. Rapid responses are not indexed in PubMed and they are not journal articles. The BMJ reserves the right to remove responses which are being wilfully misrepresented as published articles.
I just would like one reviewer to receive two papers at the same
time: one from MIT, Boston, USA and the other from University of Dhaka in
Bangladesh. There is no way, a person can not be biased as to the quality
of science performed according to some pre-perceived notions about a
country. Its part of human nature. And this exactly should be avoided if
the major aim of the peer review process is to promote good and fair
evaluation of science. In the open review process, the reviewer will be
forced to review the manuscript content and not be clouded by the economy,
the GDP, the international stature of a given country.