Observations GMC Wakefield Verdict Why did the Lancet take so long? BMJ 2010; 340 doi: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.c644 (Published 02 February 2010) Cite this as: BMJ 2010;340:c644 Article Related content Metrics Responses Peer review Related articles Observations Reflections on investigating Wakefield Published: 02 February 2010; BMJ 340 doi:10.1136/bmj.c672 News Lancet retracts Wakefield’s MMR paper Published: 02 February 2010; BMJ 340 doi:10.1136/bmj.c696 Editorial MMR vaccine and autism Published: 02 February 2010; BMJ 340 doi:10.1136/bmj.c655 Editor's Choice MMR and other controversies Published: 04 February 2010; BMJ 340 doi:10.1136/bmj.c706 See more Introductory Address Prov Med Surg J October 03, 1840, s1-1 (1) 1-4; DOI: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.s1-1.1.1 Report of the Meeting of the Eastern Branch of the Provincial Association at Bury St. Edmond's Prov Med Surg J October 03, 1840, s1-1 (1) 10-13; DOI: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.s1-1.1.10 Mr. Warburton's Bill for the Regulation of the Medical Profession Prov Med Surg J October 03, 1840, s1-1 (1) 13-15; DOI: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.s1-1.1.13 An Atlas of Plates, illustrative of the Principles and Practice of Obstetric Medicine and Surgery, with descriptive Letterpress Prov Med Surg J October 03, 1840, s1-1 (1) 4; DOI: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.s1-1.1.4 A Practical Treatise on the Diseases peculiar to Women, illustrated by Cases, &c Prov Med Surg J October 03, 1840, s1-1 (1) 4-5; DOI: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.s1-1.1.4-a Cited by... Reforming Science: Methodological and Cultural ReformsAbstract Fulltext PDF
