Intended for healthcare professionals

  1. Research
  2. The impact of outcome...
  3. The impact of outcome reporting bias in randomised controlled trials on a cohort of systematic reviews
Research Methods & Reporting

The impact of outcome reporting bias in randomised controlled trials on a cohort of systematic reviews

BMJ 2010; 340 doi: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.c365 (Published 15 February 2010) Cite this as: BMJ 2010;340:c365

Data supplement

  • Web Extra

    Extra material supplied by the author

    Files in this Data Supplement:

    • Data Supplement - Web table A Examples of the Outcome Reporting Bias In Trials (ORBIT) study classifications
    • Data Supplement - Web table B Summary of trials classified as C according to the significance of the result

Related articles

See more

Cited by...

  • The association between influenza vaccination, all-cause mortality and cardiovascular mortality: a protocol for a living systematic review and prospective meta-analysis
  • Protocol for the development of Core Outcome Sets for Early intervention trials to Prevent Obesity in CHildren (COS-EPOCH)
  • Restoring invisible and abandoned trials of gabapentin for neuropathic pain: a clinical and methodological investigation
  • E-cigarette manufacturers compliance with clinical trial reporting expectations: a case series of registered trials by Juul Labs
  • Heterogeneity of outcomes for intraoperative music interventions: a scoping review and evidence map
  • Methods matter: pilot and feasibility studies in sports medicine
  • Assessing the relevance and uptake of core outcome sets (an agreed minimum collection of outcomes to measure in research studies) in Cochrane systematic reviews: a review
  • Core outcome set in paediatric sepsis in low- and middle-income countries: a study protocol
  • Outcome reporting bias in Cochrane systematic reviews: a cross-sectional analysis
  • Inconsistent outcome reporting in large neonatal trials: a systematic review
  • Effectiveness of influenza vaccines in adults with chronic liver disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis
  • Diagnostic performance of the Chronic Kidney Disease Epidemiology Collaboration (CKD-EPI) equation at estimating glomerular filtration rate in adults with diabetes mellitus: a systematic review and meta-analysis protocol
  • Compromising Outcomes
  • Establishing a core outcome set for treatment of uncomplicated appendicitis in children: study protocol for an international Delphi survey
  • Outcomes reported in randomised clinical trials of major depressive disorder treatments in adolescents: a systematic scoping review protocol
  • Effectiveness of intravenous albumin therapy to prevent spontaneous bacterial peritonitis, renal dysfunction and death in adults with cirrhosis: a protocol for a systematic review
  • Outcome reporting bias in trials: a methodological approach for assessment and adjustment in systematic reviews
  • Core Outcome Sets
  • Effectiveness of pneumococcal and influenza vaccines to prevent serious health complications in adults with chronic liver disease: a protocol for a systematic review
  • Tools for assessing risk of reporting biases in studies and syntheses of studies: a systematic review
  • Cerebrovascular Outcomes With Proton Pump Inhibitors and Thienopyridines: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
  • Perspectives of survivors, families and researchers on key outcomes for research in acute respiratory failure
  • Primary outcomes reporting in trials of paediatric type 1 diabetes mellitus: a systematic review
  • Core outcome research measures in anal cancer (CORMAC): protocol for systematic review, qualitative interviews and Delphi survey to develop a core outcome set in anal cancer
  • Meta-analysis using individual participant data from randomised trials: opportunities and limitations created by access to raw data
  • Development of core outcome sets for effectiveness trials of interventions to prevent and/or treat delirium (Del-COrS): study protocol
  • Systematic review protocol assessing the processes for linking clinical trial registries and their published results
  • Is there an association between tendinopathy and diabetes mellitus? A systematic review with meta-analysis
  • Feasibility study to examine discrepancy rates in prespecified and reported outcomes in articles submitted to The BMJ
  • Clinical impact of neoadjuvant treatment in resectable pancreatic cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis protocol
  • From Protocols to Publications: A Study in Selective Reporting of Outcomes in Randomized Trials in Oncology
  • Occurrence and determinants of selective reporting of clinical drug trials: design of an inception cohort study
  • Uptake of systematic reviews and meta-analyses based on individual participant data in clinical practice guidelines: descriptive study
  • Preferred reporting items for systematic review and meta-analysis protocols (PRISMA-P) 2015: elaboration and explanation
  • The knowledge system underpinning healthcare is not fit for purpose and must change
  • Reporting of harms in systematic reviews and their primary studies
  • Selective reporting bias of harm outcomes within studies: findings from a cohort of systematic reviews
  • Fructose, high-fructose corn syrup, sucrose, and nonalcoholic fatty liver disease or indexes of liver health: a systematic review and meta-analysis
  • How does under-reporting of negative and inconclusive results affect the false-positive rate in meta-analysis? A simulation study
  • Variation of clinical outcomes used in glaucoma randomised controlled trials: a systematic review
  • Antidepressant efficacy of agomelatine: meta-analysis of published and unpublished studies
  • Interventions to Improve Cortisol Regulation in Children: A Systematic Review
  • Survey of the Reporting Characteristics of Systematic Reviews in Rehabilitation
  • Reporting of harms data in RCTs: a systematic review of empirical assessments against the CONSORT harms extension
  • Selective reporting of outcomes in randomised controlled trials in systematic reviews of cystic fibrosis
  • The HONEYPOT Randomized Controlled Trial Statistical Analysis Plan
  • Restoring the integrity of the clinical trial evidence base
  • Influence of trial sample size on treatment effect estimates: meta-epidemiological study
  • Knowledge Integration in Cancer: Current Landscape and Future Prospects
  • Melatonin for sleep problems in children with neurodevelopmental disorders: randomised double masked placebo controlled trial
  • Reporting of conflicts of interest from drug trials in Cochrane reviews: cross sectional study
  • Standard 5: Selection, Measurement, and Reporting of Outcomes in Clinical Trials in Children
  • Outcome reporting bias in evaluations of public health interventions: evidence of impact and the potential role of a study register
  • The truth, but not the whole truth? Call for an amnesty on unreported results of public health interventions
  • Homeopathic medicines for children
  • Consistency in the Analysis and Reporting of Primary End Points in Oncology Randomized Controlled Trials From Registration to Publication: A Systematic Review
  • Bias in systematic reviews?
  • Recommendations for examining and interpreting funnel plot asymmetry in meta-analyses of randomised controlled trials
  • Frequency and reasons for outcome reporting bias in clinical trials: interviews with trialists
  • Assessment of publication bias, selection bias, and unavailable data in meta-analyses using individual participant data: a database survey
  • Effect of reporting bias on meta-analyses of drug trials: reanalysis of meta-analyses
Back to top