Head To Head Should the Quality and Outcomes Framework be abolished? Yes BMJ 2010; 340 doi: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.c2710 (Published 07 June 2010) Cite this as: BMJ 2010;340:c2710 Article Related content Metrics Responses Peer review Related articles Head To Head Should the Quality and Outcomes Framework be abolished? No Published: 07 June 2010; BMJ 340 doi:10.1136/bmj.c2794 Editor's Choice QOF and consent Published: 17 June 2010; BMJ 340 doi:10.1136/bmj.c3235 See more The Association of Cancer Physicians responds to “Cancer drugs, survival, and ethics” BMJ December 05, 2016, 355 i6487; DOI: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.i6487 Hunt rebukes NHS leaders for asking for more cash BMJ December 02, 2016, 355 i6514; DOI: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.i6514 COPD diagnosis must improve, says report by Royal College of Physicians BMJ November 18, 2016, 355 i6184; DOI: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.i6184 Republican election sweep is likely to spell end for US health reform law BMJ November 09, 2016, 355 i6045; DOI: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.i6045 What if NHS leaders were more representative of patients and staff? BMJ November 02, 2016, 355 i5828; DOI: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.i5828 Cited by... Capturing complexity in clinician case-mix: classification system development using GP and physician associate dataAbstract Fulltext PDF The Quality and Outcomes Framework and self-management dialogue in primary care consultations: a qualitative studyAbstract Fulltext PDF 'In my day ...: towards the utilisation of living history?Abstract Fulltext PDF
