Research
Modified intention to treat reporting in randomised controlled trials: systematic review
BMJ 2010; 340 doi: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.c2697 (Published 14 June 2010) Cite this as: BMJ 2010;340:c2697
Data supplement
Web Extra
Extra material supplied by the author
Files in this Data Supplement:
- Data Supplement - Types of deviation in modified intention to treat
Related articles
- Paper Published: 11 September 1999; BMJ 319 doi:10.1136/bmj.319.7211.670
- Research Published: 04 December 2008; BMJ 337 doi:10.1136/bmj.a2299
- PAPERS Published: 28 January 2005; BMJ doi:10.1136/bmj.38356.424606.8F
- Paper Published: 31 March 2005; BMJ 330 doi:10.1136/bmj.38356.424606.8F
- RESEARCH Published: 19 July 2006; BMJ doi:10.1136/bmj.38895.410451.79
- Research Published: 27 July 2006; BMJ 333 doi:10.1136/bmj.38895.410451.79
- Paper Published: 29 May 2003; BMJ 326 doi:10.1136/bmj.326.7400.1171
- Research Published: 07 September 2009; BMJ 339 doi:10.1136/bmj.b3244
- Education And DebatePost-randomisation exclusions: the intention to treat principle and excluding patients from analysisPublished: 21 September 2002; BMJ 325 doi:10.1136/bmj.325.7365.652
- Research Methods & Reporting Published: 09 January 2013; BMJ 346 doi:10.1136/bmj.e7586
See more
- By not publishing good qualitative research The BMJ is not fulfilling its valuesBMJ March 15, 2016, 352 i1478; DOI: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.i1478
- Qualitative research and The BMJBMJ February 10, 2016, 352 i641; DOI: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.i641
- Case for cultural adaptation of psychological interventions for mental healthcare in low and middle income countriesBMJ December 16, 2014, 349 g7636; DOI: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.g7636
- Preventing bad reporting on health researchBMJ December 10, 2014, 349 g7465; DOI: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.g7465
- Diabetes UK responds to comments by Asimakopoulou and colleaguesBMJ January 29, 2014, 348 g1152; DOI: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.g1152
Cited by...
- Missing data in randomised controlled trials of rheumatoid arthritis drug therapy are substantial and handled inappropriately
- Exclusion of enrolled participants in randomised controlled trials: what to do with ineligible participants?
- Randomized Trials in Cardiac Surgery: JACC Review Topic of the Week
- Reply to Zhou and Wu, "Be Careful with Adverse Events Caused by Cefoperazone-Sulbactam"
- Use of modified intention-to-treat analysis in studies of direct oral anticoagulants and risk of selection bias: a systematic review
- Non-inferiority trials: are they inferior? A systematic review of reporting in major medical journals
- Interpreting trial results following use of different intention-to-treat approaches for preventing attrition bias: a meta-epidemiological study protocol
- SPIRIT 2013 explanation and elaboration: guidance for protocols of clinical trials
- Challenges in Evaluating an Arthritis Self-management Program for People with Hip and Knee Osteoarthritis in Real-world Clinical Settings