Intended for healthcare professionals

  1. Research
  2. The routine use of...
  3. The routine use of patient reported outcome measures in healthcare settings
Research Methods & Reporting

The routine use of patient reported outcome measures in healthcare settings

BMJ 2010; 340 doi: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.c186 (Published 18 January 2010) Cite this as: BMJ 2010;340:c186

Related articles

See more

Cited by...

  • Patient experience of gastrointestinal endoscopy: informing the development of the Newcastle ENDOPREM™
  • Presently PROMs are not tailored for athletes and high-performance sports practitioners: a systematic review
  • Tracking a painful episode after a joint replacement using patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs)
  • Using home sensing technology to assess outcome and recovery after hip and knee replacement in the UK: the HEmiSPHERE study protocol
  • Can patient-reported measurements of pain be used to improve cancer pain management? A systematic review and meta-analysis
  • Feasibility and acceptability of a patient-reported outcome intervention in chronic heart failure
  • Core Outcome Sets in Miscarriage Trials (COSMisT) study: a study protocol
  • Validity of three asthma-specific quality of life questionnaires: the patients' perspective
  • Systematic evaluation of patient-reported outcome (PRO) protocol content and reporting in UK cancer clinical trials: the EPiC study protocol
  • Implementation of Technology-based Patient Engagement Strategies within Practice-based Research Networks
  • IKDC Subjective Knee Form and Marx Activity Rating Scale are suitable to evaluate all orthopaedic sports medicine knee conditions: a systematic review
  • Patient Reported Outcome Measures (PROMs) have arrived in sports and exercise medicine: Why do they matter?
  • Perspectives from health, social care and policy stakeholders on the value of a single self-report outcome measure across long-term conditions: a qualitative study
  • Evidence in managing traumatic anterior shoulder instability: a scoping review
  • Patient reported outcome measures in practice
  • Functionality and feedback: a protocol for a realist synthesis of the collation, interpretation and utilisation of PROMs data to improve patient care
  • Development and validation of a rapid, generic measure of disease control from the patient's perspective: the IBD-Control questionnaire
  • Development and initial validation of a new outcome measure for hospice and palliative care: the St Christopher's Index of Patient Priorities (SKIPP)
  • How can clinical practice guidelines be adapted to facilitate shared decision making? A qualitative key-informant study
  • Extending the use of PROMs in the NHS--using the Oxford Knee Score in patients undergoing non-operative management for knee osteoarthritis: a validation study
  • Effect of telehealth on quality of life and psychological outcomes over 12 months (Whole Systems Demonstrator telehealth questionnaire study): nested study of patient reported outcomes in a pragmatic, cluster randomised controlled trial
  • Hip arthroscopy for intra-articular pathology: a systematic review of outcomes with and without femoral osteoplasty
  • The Copenhagen Hip and Groin Outcome Score (HAGOS): development and validation according to the COSMIN checklist
  • Validation of a numerical rating scale to assess functional impairment in hip and knee osteoarthritis: comparison with the WOMAC function scale
  • The true cost of pharmacological disease prevention
  • Using PROMs to improve equity
  • The use of patient-reported outcome measures and patient satisfaction ratings to assess outcome in hemiarthroplasty of the shoulder
Back to top