Research
Association between industry affiliation and position on cardiovascular risk with rosiglitazone: cross sectional systematic review
BMJ 2010; 340 doi: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.c1344 (Published 19 March 2010) Cite this as: BMJ 2010;340:c1344
Data supplement
Web Extra
Extra material supplied by the author
Files in this Data Supplement:
- Data Supplement - Web extra Included articles, search strategy, disagreements between the two reviewers, prevalence and disclosures of conflicts of interest, sensitivity analyses, analysis of pioglitazone use, PRISMA statement checklist, and references
Related articles
- Feature Published: 21 December 2010; BMJ 341 doi:10.1136/bmj.c7248
- Feature Published: 07 April 2010; BMJ 340 doi:10.1136/bmj.c1848
- Research Published: 17 March 2011; BMJ 342 doi:10.1136/bmj.d1309
- News Published: 18 August 2011; BMJ 343 doi:10.1136/bmj.d5269
- Research Published: 11 October 2011; BMJ 343 doi:10.1136/bmj.d5621
- Observations Published: 08 May 2012; BMJ 344 doi:10.1136/bmj.e3247
- Research Published: 20 August 2012; BMJ 345 doi:10.1136/bmj.e5155
- Analysis Published: 01 November 2012; BMJ 345 doi:10.1136/bmj.e7031
- Editorial Published: 10 June 2013; BMJ 346 doi:10.1136/bmj.f3692
- Research Published: 12 October 2006; BMJ 333 doi:10.1136/bmj.38973.444699.0B
- RESEARCH Published: 06 October 2006; BMJ doi:10.1136/bmj.38973.444699.0B
- Editorial Published: 16 April 2019; BMJ 365 doi:10.1136/bmj.l1706
- Feature Published: 03 May 2019; BMJ 365 doi:10.1136/bmj.l1939
- Analysis Published: 03 December 2019; BMJ 367 doi:10.1136/bmj.l6576
- Research Published: 27 May 2020; BMJ 369 doi:10.1136/bmj.m1505
- Research Published: 09 December 2020; BMJ 371 doi:10.1136/bmj.m4234
See more
- Constitutional symptoms in a young personBMJ December 07, 2016, 355 i5781; DOI: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.i5781
- What it feels like to be an interesting teaching opportunityBMJ December 07, 2016, 355 i6190; DOI: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.i6190
- Author’s reply to Dangoor and colleaguesBMJ December 05, 2016, 355 i6508; DOI: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.i6508
- Time for guidelines on safety netting?BMJ December 05, 2016, 355 i6411; DOI: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.i6411
- The BMJ Christmas appeal 2016-7: Orbis, the sight saversBMJ December 01, 2016, 355 i6425; DOI: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.i6425
Cited by...
- Suicide risk with selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors and other new-generation antidepressants in adults: a systematic review and meta-analysis of observational studies
- Suicide risk with selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors and new-generation serotonergic-noradrenergic antidepressants in adults: a systematic review and meta-analysis of observational studies
- Association between conflicts of interest and favourable recommendations in clinical guidelines, advisory committee reports, opinion pieces, and narrative reviews: systematic review
- What to do with a clinical trial with conflicts of interest
- Reporting of financial conflicts of interest by Canadian clinical practice guideline producers: a descriptive study
- Financial ties between leaders of influential US professional medical associations and industry: cross sectional study
- Mixed methods evaluation of workshops for citizen health advocates about financial conflicts of interests in healthcare
- Pathways to independence: towards producing and using trustworthy evidence
- Commercial interests, transparency, and independence: a call for submissions
- From the $80 hamburger to managing conflicts of interest with the pharmaceutical industry
- The relation between publication rate and financial conflict of interest among physician authors of high-impact oncology publications: an observational study
- What does expert opinion in guidelines mean? a meta-epidemiological study
- Competing demands and opportunities in primary care
- Demandes concurrentielles et possibilites en soins primaires
- Guidelines for reporting meta-epidemiological methodology research
- Les lignes directrices en soins primaires devraient-elles etre redigees par des medecins de famille?: OUI
- Should primary care guidelines be written by family physicians?: YES
- Conflicts of interest and spin in reviews of psychological therapies: a systematic review
- Contributors to primary care guidelines: What are their professions and how many of them have conflicts of interest?
- Collaborateurs aux lignes directrices en soins primaires: Quelles sont leurs professions et combien sont en conflit d'interets?
- Industry influence in evidence production
- Helping patients make sense of the risks of taking GLP-1 agonists
- Content area experts as authors: helpful or harmful for systematic reviews and meta-analyses?
- Reporting of conflicts of interest from drug trials in Cochrane reviews: cross sectional study
- The dos and don'ts of collaborating with industry
- Prevalence of financial conflicts of interest among panel members producing clinical practice guidelines in Canada and United States: cross sectional study
- Comparative cardiovascular effects of thiazolidinediones: systematic review and meta-analysis of observational studies
- Industry Affiliation and Position on the Rosiglitazone Controversy
- Rosiglitazone, marketing, and medical science