Intended for healthcare professionals

Careers

Choosing a specialty

BMJ 2009; 339 doi: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.b5237 (Published 10 December 2009) Cite this as: BMJ 2009;339:b5237
  1. Nuala Campbell, consultant anaesthetist, associate dean1,
  2. Ahmed Sabra, clinical academic fellow in emergency medicine2,
  3. Lorraine Alderson, consultant anaesthetist3,
  4. Stephanie Bull, teaching fellow4
  1. 1South Devon Healthcare NHS Foundation Trust
  2. 2United Bristol Hospital NHS Trust
  3. 3Derriford Hospitals NHS Trust, Plymouth
  4. 4Institute of Clinical Education, Peninsula College of Medicine and Dentistry, University of Exeter
  1. nuala.campbell{at}nhs.net

Abstract

Nuala Campbell and colleagues look at how to plan your career in the post-Modernising Medical Careers world

A major feature of the current postgraduate medical training system in the United Kingdom is the highly structured programmes of the foundation years and the core or specialty training that follows. Doctors must apply for training in their chosen specialty during the first half of their second foundation year.

Research on specialty career choice in medicine before Modernising Medical Careers (MMC) was introduced has identified the impact of role models,1 sex,23 structure of training,4 personal attributes,5 and lifestyle factors.46 However, it is direct experience of working in a specialty that has emerged as a major factor in doctors’ decisions on which specialty to choose.

In 2005 a study looking specifically at the influence of the foundation programme on career intentions found that, for most doctors, experience of training in specific posts was a major influencing factor.4 A later study confirmed that the most important factor influencing specialty choice for UK graduates is experience of working as a doctor in the first few years.7

Although the structure of foundation programmes and the opportunity for “tasters” were intended to allow a broad experience of specialties, in reality if a specialty doesn’t feature in the first 18 months of your foundation programme then there is limited opportunity to experience it before applying for a core or specialty training programme.

How has MMC affected decision making?

So how are junior doctors making specialty career choices since MMC was introduced? To understand this we have undertaken a study, the preliminary results of which may be helpful to junior doctors who are applying for specialty training posts in the near future. Between February and June 2009, we interviewed 20 trainees from both teaching and district general hospitals in the South West Peninsula. These doctors were from a range of specialties and from foundation year 1 through to specialty training year 3. The interviews were designed to investigate participants’ perception of themselves and of different specialties, and the factors that influenced their career choice.

Impact of the recruitment and selection system

Early commitment Our study confirmed the sense of pressure to make the right career choice at an early stage and a perception that there is limited opportunity to change direction after that point. We know that, historically, a quarter of doctors have changed their career choices between one and three years after qualifying and less than half regard their choice in year 3 as definite.8 The opportunity to change direction is now much more limited, although the desire may still be there; thus the sense of pressure is understandable.

Competition Many trainees were aware of the competition for certain specialties, although this did not discourage them from applying for their preferred specialty. The willingness to compete for a specialty was related to their degree of self confidence, which derived from both positive feedback from seniors and peers, and acknowledged “natural ability” and how this matched the perceived characteristics of the specialty.

Although the MMC website urges doctors to weigh carefully the competition for specialties when considering their applications,9 other factors seem to be influencing doctors’ choices. As one trainee said, “In retrospect you think . . . ‘I was so lucky to get that job,’ . . . but at the time you just think ‘Well that’s what I want to do and I’m just gonna go for it.’”

Structure of the specialty training programmes

The availability of flexibility in both working hours and career opportunities within a specialty was an important theme. Although junior doctors have regard for their work-life balance, and for some this has had considerable influence on their chosen specialty, there was still recognition that to remain competitive, additional “non-contracted” hours will need to be worked.

In recent years there have been many calls for increased flexibility in both training and working patterns in medicine.1011 These calls are partly, but not exclusively, linked to the increasing number of women in the profession; however, several men in our study cited family commitments as a determining factor in their career choice.

MMC is founded on principles that include being flexible and trainee centred.12 Although there are examples of specialties with excellent practice in this regard, the perception is that not all specialties have adapted as well as they might.

Reality of working practice

Time to do a good job The service pressure of working in the NHS was strongly felt, and there was frustration at not having enough time to do a good job. For some doctors this has had a major impact on their choice of specialty. As one doctor explained, “I never enjoyed being on-call (in acute specialties) . . . being stressed and harassed all the time . . . I needed to go into something where I could take my time and make decisions.”

Teamwork Trainees want to work in specialties that are challenging and stimulating. Although for some this means working closely within multidisciplinary teams to solve complex problems, for others this means taking responsibility and working independently. The choice of specialty seems to be strongly influenced by which of these styles the individual considers their natural preference.

Undergraduate and foundation experience

Student versus employee When making decisions on choice of specialty, doctors are drawing on experiences both at undergraduate level and during foundation training. Work during the foundation years was much more influential than student experiences. This perception confirms earlier research findings from both the UK and Australia,413 which showed that work experience since graduation was the second most important extrinsic factor influencing specialty choice. This ranked well above undergraduate experience.

Overseas experience The experience of training in a given specialty differs between countries, and many doctors who had worked overseas had changed their specialty choices when working in the UK because of this. For these doctors, the reality of working in a specialty in the UK had not matched their previous experiences.

Perceptions of specialties

All doctors had a strong perception of different specialties, particularly the variety and complexity of conditions encountered and the extent to which different specialties impact on patient outcomes. Matching the perception of themselves to that of a specialty was an important decision making strategy used by the doctors in our study.

This strategy has been recognised for some years and is utilised by specialty choice inventories such as the Sci 59 online.14 Sci 59 online is a professionally constructed psychometric instrument designed especially for selection of medical careers. It matches an individual’s aspirations and personal and professional characteristics to appropriate specialty choices.

Use of formal career management resources and tools

In our study, the influence of formal career management advice or tools in influencing specialty choice was striking by its absence. Only one of the doctors interviewed had benefited from career coaching, and in his case this had been to enable him to change specialties at specialty training year 3 level. The MMC programme board, deaneries, and royal colleges have recently invested considerable resources into supporting specialty choice decision making; however, the doctors we interviewed had not been influenced by these resources in choosing their specialties.

Discussion

Most career development theories recognise the important role of self concept—or how we see ourselves. Career choices entail seeking out roles that provide personal satisfaction on the basis of our view of who we are and how we are.1516 The discomfort of early decision making by junior doctors, especially if they have not had meaningful work experience to confirm their preferences, may be explained in relation to these theories: our view of who and how we are takes time to develop, and making choices before this occurs is challenging.

Even for those who have made their choices on the basis of experience and self knowledge—such as those overseas doctors who have already had some training in a specialty outside the UK—if the reality of training in that specialty in the UK is different, then the doctor may feel they no longer fit.

What can medical students and doctors do to help them choose the right specialty?

Undergraduates

Make the most of undergraduate experiences Although our study and others have found that the impact of undergraduate experience is much less important than that of postgraduate experience, students should use clinical placements to explore what it would be like to be a specialist trainee or consultant working in a specialty rather than view student placements in light of their current educational needs.

Select your foundation programme with care Clinical posts at this level are likely to be the only opportunity to try out a possible career choice.

Foundation doctors

Ensure your perception of a specialty is clear and accurate Information about the structure of training and working in different specialties is available from the royal college websites. Some of these websites, such as that of the Royal College of Surgeons, have sections on career development and the nature of working in that specialty. Some colleges, such as the Royal College of Anaesthetists, run career workshops specifically targeted to foundation doctors making specialty choices.

Most junior doctors are quite clear about what is entailed in the next step of their training, but many are remarkably vague about what lies beyond that. Talking to senior trainees and consultants in a specialty is an important way of gaining insight into what it is really like to work in a particular discipline.

Plan and target taster experiences If taster experiences are to be of any value, they need to be undertaken during the first few months of foundation year 2.

Use available career management resources Most foundation schools and deaneries provide a professional career management service. This may include the use of a psychometric questionnaire such as Myers-Briggs type indexing17 or a learning styles inventory such as Honey and Mumford.18 Undertaking a specialty choice inventory such as Sci 59 online may be helpful. None of these tools will choose your specialty but they will provide a background for decision making. The London Deanery has developed a comprehensive medical career management website through which trainees can develop an understanding of themselves and the specialties.19 Last, but not least, discussions with friends, peers, role models, and mentors are invaluable.

Further information

Royal college websites
Other useful websites
  • Confederation of Postgraduate Medical Deans of the United Kingdom. Home page contains links to all postgraduate deanery websites: www.copmed.org.uk

  • Career management website developed by Kent, Surrey and Sussex Deanery. Includes interactive tools for self assessment, career exploration, decision making, and plan implementation: www.medicalcareers.nhs.uk

Footnotes

  • Competing interests: None declared.

References