Endgames Statistical Question Random allocation I BMJ 2009; 339 doi: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.b4719 (Published 19 November 2009) Cite this as: BMJ 2009;339:b4719 Article Related content Metrics Responses Peer review Related articles Endgames Sources of bias in randomised controlled trials Published: 08 December 2010; BMJ 341 doi:10.1136/bmj.c6995 Endgames Random allocation III Published: 03 December 2009; BMJ 339 doi:10.1136/bmj.b5072 Endgames Confounding in randomised controlled trials Published: 06 October 2010; BMJ 341 doi:10.1136/bmj.c5403 Endgames Matching Published: 12 November 2009; BMJ 339 doi:10.1136/bmj.b4581 See more Units of sampling, observation, and analysis BMJ October 09, 2015, 351 h5396; DOI: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.h5396 Randomised controlled trials: understanding confounding BMJ September 25, 2015, 351 h5119; DOI: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.h5119 Understanding the ecological fallacy BMJ September 21, 2015, 351 h4773; DOI: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.h4773 How to read a funnel plot in a meta-analysis BMJ September 16, 2015, 351 h4718; DOI: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.h4718 Understanding the Hawthorne effect BMJ September 04, 2015, 351 h4672; DOI: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.h4672 Cited by... Sources of bias in randomised controlled trialsFulltext Confounding in randomised controlled trialsFulltext Random allocation IIIFulltext
