Rapid responses are electronic comments to the editor. They enable our users to debate issues raised in articles published on bmj.com. A rapid response is first posted online. If you need the URL (web address) of an individual response, simply click on the response headline and copy the URL from the browser window. A proportion of responses will, after editing, be published online and in the print journal as letters, which are indexed in PubMed. Rapid responses are not indexed in PubMed and they are not journal articles. The BMJ reserves the right to remove responses which are being wilfully misrepresented as published articles.
It is very puzzling that an academic modeling exercise such as Smith
et al's paper would be published at this point in time. This is all the
more puzzling given that it is well established now that this H1N1
influenza has an infection fatality rate of less than 1:25,000 or 0.004
percent, a fraction of the lowest CFR used in the paper. It also beggars
belief that the model would include such extensive closing of schools when
such closures haven't been undertaken.
This 'pandemic' does not meet the definitions used to establish
pandemic preparedness plans. It is not a new sub-type and it has not
resulted in enormous numbers of deaths and illness. If it wasn't for the
fact that the WHO changed the definitions of a pandemic to potentially
include seasonal influenza then this would not be a pandemic.
An international judicial inquiry is need to determine how and why
the definition of a pandemic could be changed by WHO so arbitrarily,
especially given the fact that some, if not all, vaccine supply contracts
were invoked when the WHO declared a phase six pandemic.