Evidence based implementation of complex interventions
BMJ 2009; 339 doi: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.b3124 (Published 12 August 2009) Cite this as: BMJ 2009;339:b3124All rapid responses
Rapid responses are electronic comments to the editor. They enable our users to debate issues raised in articles published on bmj.com. A rapid response is first posted online. If you need the URL (web address) of an individual response, simply click on the response headline and copy the URL from the browser window. A proportion of responses will, after editing, be published online and in the print journal as letters, which are indexed in PubMed. Rapid responses are not indexed in PubMed and they are not journal articles. The BMJ reserves the right to remove responses which are being wilfully misrepresented as published articles or when it is brought to our attention that a response spreads misinformation.
From March 2022, the word limit for rapid responses will be 600 words not including references and author details. We will no longer post responses that exceed this limit.
The word limit for letters selected from posted responses remains 300 words.
Do you think it would make a difference if the patient were to be
assessed by a doctor rather than a triage nurse?
Competing interests:
None declared
Competing interests: No competing interests
I think the simplest explanation for doing an x-ray is that it meets
the expectation of the patient. I have heard the complaint "and they
didn't even do an x-ray." many times. If the patient actually is found to
have a fracture at a later visit, well then the physician is vulnerable to
a law suit or a complaint. While the physician's position is defensible,
it is an enormous waste of time responding to the petty administrators as
they wave the patient complaint and demand explanation, never mind if
there is a lawsuit. Much easier to give the 'client' what they want and
then everyone is happy. As well, emergency departments in most parts of
the world are extremely busy, there is no time for patient education.
Maybe its time for the bureaucrats to establish a new profession 'patient
educator' who can run behind doctors and explain the rationale of all the
decisions.
Competing interests:
None declared
Competing interests: No competing interests
Dear Sir / Madam,
Thompson’s editorial reflections (Thompson, 2009) on the attempt by
Besson and colleagues (Besson et al., 2009) to encourage uptake of the
Ottowa ankle rules perpetuate the ubiquitous misuse of the term ‘complex’
in discussion of health interventions and their implementation and impact.
Referring to the clinical decision tool in this way detracts attention
from the real challenges involved in achieving change in adaptive systems
which demonstrate “dynamic conservatism” (Argyris & Schön, 1978).
The delivery of health care involves people and procedures operating in
systems designed to achieve a range of goals - sometimes these goals and
evidence conflict.
In the context described by Besson et al, (2009) we contend, it is
not the intervention which explains the problems of implementation of
evidence based practice. The "Ottawa ankle rules" were informed by
evidence that suggests that at a population level lots of x-rays are
unnecessary. However, clinicians in A&E deal with individual human beings.
Six year old Tarquin has fallen off his swing and is taken to A&E because
he is complaining of a painful ankle. The nurse is sure it is not broken
but Tarquin’s Mum and Dad are not happy about him being sent home without
an x-ray. Tarquin is sent for X-ray, receives the all clear and he and Mum
and Dad go home happy. Although she attended a recent in-service tutorial
and has the new form, the referring nurse is unlikely to have agonised
over the detail of the Ottawa ankle rules. She is concurrently expected to
get people in an out of the A&E department within target times, avoid re-
presentation of patients and to provide patient-centred care. Furthermore
she would rather be safe than sorry – when she trained, evidence based
medicine was firmly in favour of radiography to promote patient benefit
rather than its minimisation to promote efficiency savings.
We contend that misapplication of the term ‘complex’ to relatively simple interventions, even those which comprise multiple components, obscures a fundamental flaw in the capacity of the evidence-based quest for predictability. By calling simple interventions complex we deflect necessary attention from the need for methodologies that help us better understand the inherent unpredictability of outcome generation in the real world.
Argyris C & Schön D Organizational learning: A theory of action
perspective. Reading, Mass: Addison Wesley. 1978.
Bessen T, Clark R, Shakib S, Hughes G. A multifaceted strategy for
implementation of the Ottawa ankle rules in two emergency departments. BMJ
2009;339:b3056.
Thompson R Evidence based implementation of complex interventions BMJ
2009;339:b3124
Competing interests:
None declared
Competing interests: No competing interests
The right practice
Sir
When I joined here 4 years ago every child was receiving IV fluids
and IV
ampicillin, when I enquired my colleagues told me that it is like a flower
bouquet and the welcome drink you receive in a five star hotel! It makes
everyone happy: keep the patients (consumer) happy, you are also
happy. The medical practice is guided more by pleasing the consumers
than by any clinical guidelines.
Competing interests:
None declared
Competing interests: No competing interests