Kidney function and risk of cardiovascular disease and mortality in women: a prospective cohort study
BMJ 2009; 338 doi: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.b2392 (Published 29 June 2009) Cite this as: BMJ 2009;338:b2392All rapid responses
Rapid responses are electronic comments to the editor. They enable our users to debate issues raised in articles published on bmj.com. A rapid response is first posted online. If you need the URL (web address) of an individual response, simply click on the response headline and copy the URL from the browser window. A proportion of responses will, after editing, be published online and in the print journal as letters, which are indexed in PubMed. Rapid responses are not indexed in PubMed and they are not journal articles. The BMJ reserves the right to remove responses which are being wilfully misrepresented as published articles or when it is brought to our attention that a response spreads misinformation.
From March 2022, the word limit for rapid responses will be 600 words not including references and author details. We will no longer post responses that exceed this limit.
The word limit for letters selected from posted responses remains 300 words.
The risk of cardiovascular (CV) events and death increases as serum creatinine increases1 or glomerular filtration rate (GFR) declines2 but this relationship is exponential as GFR declines <_45 ml="ml" min="min" _1.73="_1.73" msup="msup"/>2. Patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD) and cardiovascular disease (CVD) often have common cardiovascular (CV) risk factors during early stages of CKD (stages 1, 2 & 3a) and the CV risk is similar unless proteinuria is present3. The non-traditional risk factors – such as, inflammation, anemia and calcium phosphate metabolism, contribute to CVD especially at advanced stages of CKD (stage 3b, 4 & 5), especially when the glomerular filtration rate (GFR) is <_45 ml="ml" min="min" _1.73msup="_1.73msup"/>2.
In the Women’s Health Study4, off the 27,939 women, 4.7% (1315) women had a GFR of <_60 ml="ml" min="min" _1.73msup="_1.73msup"/>2. Of these 84 women had any CV event and 60 women died with 21 from CVD and 39 from non-CVD. Although total number of women with GFR of <_40 ml="ml" min="min" _1.73msup="_1.73msup"/>2 is not given but 67 of the 84 women with CV events had a GFR of <_40 ml="ml" min="min" _1.73msup="_1.73msup"/>2 and authors claim that the small number of women in this category limited the interpretation. However, it appears that most of the CV events occurred in women with GFR of <_40 ml="ml" min="min" _1.73msup="_1.73msup"/>2, than what authors claim to be in patients with GFR of <_60 ml="ml" min="min" _1.73msup="_1.73msup"/>2. I am not clear why authors selected a GFR of <_40 ml="ml" min="min" _1.73msup="_1.73msup"/>2 and NOT GFR of <_45 ml="ml" min="min" _1.73msup="_1.73msup"/>2, that has recently been categorized to be a separate category5 because of a small proportion of patients with CKD with increased risk of CKD progression, complications and risk of CVD, compared to stage 3a CKD (GFR 46-60 ml/min/1.73m2) that is more prevalent6 than stages 3b, 4 and 5 combined and majority of this stage patients are NOT at increased risk of CVD compared to general population3, so that limited resources be used effectively in real high-risk patients.
However, Kurth et al4, combined stage 3a (apples) and stage 3b, 4 &5 (oranges) in their analyses and no doubt accordingly concluded that “GFR of <_60 ml="ml" min="min" _1.73msup="_1.73msup"/>2 in this cohort of women was associated with increased risk of CVD death” or simply that the “apples are sour!”
There are large numbers of patients in stage 3a CKD compared to stages 3b, 4 and 5 combined and these two groups are different and the later group is at increased risk for CV disease and events and
It is important to differentiate these two groups of CKD patients to effectively utilize limited resources.
References:
1. Shulman NB, Ford CE, Hall WD, Blaufox MD, Simon D, Langford HG, Schneider KA. Prognostic value of serum creatinine and effect of treatment of hypertension on renal function. Results from the hypertension detection and follow-up program. The Hypertension Detection and Follow-up Program Cooperative Group. Hypertension. 1989 May;13(5 Suppl):I80-93.
2. Go AS, Chertow GM, Fan D, McCulloch CE, Hsu CY. Chronic kidney disease and the risks of death, cardiovascular events, and hospitalization. N Engl J Med. 2004 Sep 23; 351(13):1296-305.
3. Brantsma AH, Bakker SJL, Hillege HL, de Zeeuw D, de Jong PE, Gansvoort RT for the PREVEND study. Cardiovascular and renal outcomes in subjects with K/DOQI stage 1-3 chronic kidney disease: the importance of urinary albumin excretion. Nephrol Dial Transplant 2008; 23:3851-58.
4. Kurth T, de jong PE, Cook NR, Buring JE, Ridker PM. Kidney function and risk of cardiovascular disease and mortality in women: a prospective cohort study. BMJ 2009;338:b2392
5. Crowe E, Halpin D, Stevens P, on behalf of the guideline development group. Early identification and management of chronic kidney disease: summary of NICE guidance. BMJ 2008; 337:a1530
6. Imai E, Horio M, Yamagata K, Eseki K, Hara S, Ura N, Kiyohara Y, Makino H, Hishida A, Matsuo S. Slower decline of glomerular filtration rate in the Japanese General Population: A longitudinal 10-year Follow-up study. Hypertn Res 2008; 31(3):433-41.
Competing interests:
None declared
Competing interests: No competing interests
Kurth et al found that in a large prospective cohort of women,
without prior cardiovascular disease or other major disease at study
entry, there was no association between mild to moderate kidney impairment
and increased risk of cardiovascular disease or all cause mortality after
12 years of follow-up [1]. Only impaired kidney function (GFR <_60 ml="ml" min="min" _1.73="_1.73" m2="m2" seemed="seemed" to="to" be="be" associated="associated" with="with" an="an" increased="increased" risk="risk" of="of" cardiovascular="cardiovascular" disease="disease" death="death" but="but" not="not" other="other" or="or" mortality="mortality" outcomes.="outcomes." p="p"/>It is widely accepted that cardiovascular disease evolves as a continuum,
from risk factors to subclinical organ damage and finally to overt
clinical cardiovascular disease. But when different compounds of this
continuum are analyzed, some relevant differences begin to emerge. Thus,
although LDL-cholesterol reduction is a key target to prevent the
development of cardiovascular outcomes, results from different trials
differ. Despite subjects at the first stages of the continuum show
important benefits with a statin therapy (i.e. JUPITER and ASTEROID trials
[2,3]), when cardiovascular disease is established, these benefits appears
to be minor or even absent (i.e. CORONA and AURORA trials [4,5]).
On the other hand, results from the meta-analysis performed by Lindholm LH
et al showed that in hypertension the effect of beta blockers, compared
with other antihypertensive drugs, was less than optimum, with a raised
risk of stroke and no additional benefit on coronary events [6]. Even
more, authors suggested that beta blockers should not remain as first
choice in the treatment of essential hypertension. By contrast, nobody
doubts about the benefits of beta blockers on myocardial infarction or
heart failure [7].
All these data show that despite a cardiovascular continuum appears
logical, it seems a tortuous continuum with different roads and
pathophysiological pathways. This should be taken into account when
considering the time to start the treatment for cardiovascular prevention,
which drug should be preferable according to the stage and patients´
clinical characteristics and the most appropriate target for each
condition according to the cardiovascular risk stratification.
References:
1. Kurth T, de Jong PE, Cook NR, Buring JE, Ridker PM. Kidney function and
risk of cardiovascular disease and mortality in women: a prospective
cohort study. BMJ 2009; 338: b2392.
2. Ridker PM, Danielson E, Fonseca FA, Genest J, Gotto AM Jr, Kastelein
JJ, et al; JUPITER Trial Study Group. Reduction in C-reactive protein and
LDL cholesterol and cardiovascular event rates after initiation of
rosuvastatin: a prospective study of the JUPITER trial. Lancet.
2009;373:1175-1182.
3. Ballantyne CM, Raichlen JS, Nicholls SJ, Erbel R, Tardif JC, Brener SJ,
et al; ASTEROID Investigators. Effect of rosuvastatin therapy on coronary
artery stenoses assessed by quantitative coronary angiography: a study to
evaluate the effect of rosuvastatin on intravascular ultrasound-derived
coronary atheroma burden. Circulation. 2008;117:2458-2466.
4. Kjekshus J, Apetrei E, Barrios V, Böhm M, Cleland JG, Cornel JH, et al;
CORONA Group. Rosuvastatin in older patients with systolic heart failure.
N Engl J Med 2007;357:2248-2261.
5. Fellström BC, Jardine AG, Schmieder RE, Holdaas H, Bannister K, Beutler
J, et al; AURORA Study Group. Rosuvastatin and cardiovascular events in
patients undergoing hemodialysis. N Engl J Med 2009;360:1395-1407.
6. Lindholm LH, Carlberg B, Samuelsson O. Should beta blockers remain
first choice in the treatment of primary hypertension? A meta-analysis.
Lancet. 2005;366:1545-53.
7. CIBIS II investigators. The Cardiac Insufficiency Bisoprolol Study II
(CIBIS-II): a randomised trial. Lancet. 1999;353:9-13.
Competing interests:
None declared
Competing interests: No competing interests
We read the interesting article and editorial on kidney function and
risk of cardiovascular disease 1, 2 with great interest. We would like to
suggest a U shaped rather than J shaped curve actually exists related to
mortality and renal function.
We agree that as well as predicting end stage renal disease, there is
growing evidence that worsening chronic kidney disease carries an
increasing risk of cardiovascular death3, 4 as well as all cause5 and non-
cardiovascular mortality6. However we have previously shown, in a study
examining the 6 year survival of over 33, 00 patients (~18,600 female and
~14700 male) aged 50 years over the full range of eGFR values, that as a
marker of mortality, both low and high eGFRs are equally predictive of
increased mortality7. In this study we also found that death due to
cardiovascular disease increased as eGFR declined in both men and women.
In addition to showing the increased mortality at low eGFR, our study has
shown that the risk of death increases as eGFR increases. Indeed the ‘J’
shaped relationships between eGFR and all-cause mortality reported by
others 5 actually elongates to a ‘U’ shape 7. While cardiovascular
disease predominated in patients with low eGFR, respiratory and neoplastic
causes appeared to account for most of the deaths in the high eGFR groups.
It seems likely, therefore, that a cachexia-associated reduction in lean
muscle mass is at least part of the reason for lower creatinine
concentrations, especially in those patients who subsequently died from
cancer. Therefore we would agree that the high eGFR maybe in part simply a
limitation of the MDRD formula to predict GFR accurately in this group of
patients. However as a marker of mortality, a high eGFR can be as
predictive of death as low values.
References
1.Weiner DE. Kidney function and the risk of cardiovascular disease.
BMJ 2009: 339; 2.
2.Kurth T, de Jong PE, Cook NR, Buring JE, Ridker PM, Kidney function
and the risk of cardiovascular disease and mortality in women: a
prospective cohort study. BMJ 2009: 338; b2392.
3.Levey AS, Eckardt KU, Tsukamoto Y, Levin A, Coresh J, Rossert J, et
al. Definition and classification of chronic kidney disease: a position
statement from Kidney Disease: Improving Global Outcomes (KDIGO). Kidney
Int 2005: 67; 2089-100.
4.Levey AS, Stevens LA, Hostetter T. Automatic Reporting of Estimated
Glomerular Filtration Rate-Just What the Doctor Ordered. Clinical
Chemistry 2006: 52; 2188.
5.Go AS, Chertow GM, Fan DJ, McCulloch CE, Hsu CY. Chronic kidney
disease and the risks of death, cardiovascular events, and
hospitalization. N Engl J Med 2004: 351;1296-305.
6.Fried LF, Katz R, Sarnak MJ, Shlipak MG, Chaves PHM, Jenny NS, et
al. Kidney Function as a Predictor of Noncardiovascular Mortality. J Am
Soc Nephrol 2005:16; 3728-35.
7.Cox HJ, Bhandari S, Rigby AS, Kilpatrick ES. Mortality at low and
high estimated GFR values. A U- shaped curve. Nephron Clinical Practice
2008: 110; 67-72.
Competing interests:
Received funding support to attend National conferences from Amgen, Novartis and Roche and received honrarium from BMS, Pfizer. Has been on the advisory boear for Roche and Astellas.
Competing interests: No competing interests
The research article by Kurth and colleagues is commendable in view
of the large size of the study population of female health professionals
mostly white and aged >45 years at the start of the project who had a
follow up of 12 years (1). They reported that “we did not observe an
increased risk of any cardiovascular disease event or mortality for the
more than 11,000 women with GFR between 60 and 89 ml/min/1.73m2”. While
agreeing that such a finding will be a reassuring piece of information for
the large percentage of the general population whose GFRs fall within that
range, the study was limited by the lack of data on markers of kidney
damage which should be important in categorizing kidney function in
individuals with GFR >60ml/min. The KDOQI guidelines on classification
work group did not consider the category of individuals with GFR 60-89
without markers of kidney damage as CKD or indeed at risk of adverse
outcomes(2). It therefore appears to me that a more appropriate deduction
from this study should read that “in the absence of information on urinary
albumin excretion rates and other markers of kidney damage that the risk
of cardiovascular disease is similar for the groups of individuals with
eGFRs 60-89 and > 90ml/min/1.73m2.
Reference:
1. Kurth T, de Jong PE, Cook NR, Buring JE, Ridker PM. Kidney function and
risk of cardiovascular disease and mortality in women: a prospective
cohort study. BMJ 2009; 338: b2392
2. NKF: K/DOQI. Definition and Classification of stages of Chronic
Kidney Disease. Am J Kidney Dis. 2002; 39: Suppl 2 S46-75
Competing interests:
None declared
Competing interests: No competing interests
Measurements of kidney function in cardiovascular disease
In the editorial (1) on the paper by Kurth et al (2) relating kidney
function to cardiovascular disease risk and mortality in women, the
authors suggest that more accurate measures of kidney function are needed
than serum creatinine and estimates of glomerular filtration rate.
One such measure might be that of the kidney endocrine function ,
notably the renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system, (a branch of the
autonomic nervous system), which responds to a reduction in sodium
concentration in the blood and leads to increased sodium absorption by the
kidney and raised blood pressure. This would give an indication of the
extent of cardiovascular system damage, particularly hypertension, so
blood pressure wold be another measure.
The paper (2) showed that there was an increased risk of
cardiovascular disease death among women with impaired kiney function .
Impaired kidney function can cause hypertension and cardiovascular disease
while hypertension and other factors such as diabetes which predispose to
cardiovascular disease , can in turn result in impaired kidney function .
References.
1. D. E. Weiner and D, E. Rifkin. Kidney function and the risk of
cardiovascular disease. (Editorial) BMJ. 2009;338:b1307 (4 July).
2. T.Kurth, P.E.de Jong, J. E. Buring and P.M. Ridker. Kidney
function and risk of cardiovascular disease and mortality in women. : a
prospective cohort study. BMJ 2009;338:b2392.(4July).
Competing interests:
None declared
Competing interests: No competing interests