Poppy love
BMJ 2008; 337 doi: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.a2334 (Published 31 October 2008) Cite this as: BMJ 2008;337:a2334All rapid responses
Rapid responses are electronic comments to the editor. They enable our users to debate issues raised in articles published on bmj.com. A rapid response is first posted online. If you need the URL (web address) of an individual response, simply click on the response headline and copy the URL from the browser window. A proportion of responses will, after editing, be published online and in the print journal as letters, which are indexed in PubMed. Rapid responses are not indexed in PubMed and they are not journal articles. The BMJ reserves the right to remove responses which are being wilfully misrepresented as published articles or when it is brought to our attention that a response spreads misinformation.
From March 2022, the word limit for rapid responses will be 600 words not including references and author details. We will no longer post responses that exceed this limit.
The word limit for letters selected from posted responses remains 300 words.
Dear Editor,
Pain (with or without a medically explained cause),
depression and distress typically present in the ‘swamp’ of
primary care, where up to 90% of people with them are
“dealt with”. Psychological causative factors for GP
consultation are still widely quoted as being the reason
for up to 40% of attendance.
Those with depression and pain are more complex in their
presentation, often less well-managed (because, for
example, the depression is seen by the practitioner as an
‘understandable’ consequence of the pain or age) and more
resistant to treatment. Such people also have higher rates
of disability, reduced psychosocial functioning and
impaired life quality. The greater the depression, the
poorer the pain-related prognosis; the more the pain
symptoms, the more severe the depression.
Optimising a person’s overall predicament unsurprisingly
delivers the best outcomes; the biopsychosocial approach to
care requires that the doctor is not the only fruit.
At least 33% of somatic symptoms are medically unexplained,
and these symptoms are chronic or recurrent in 20% to 25%
of patients. There is a highly significant number of
primary care consulters and those referred to hospital who
will still be told by a conventionally trained doctor, at
some stage, that “there is nothing physically wrong with
them”.
This time-expired and non evidence-based statement
perpetuates the legacy of Descartes and creates the
separation of physical from mental health care and all the
fruitful pickles that are derived therefrom. These include
revolving door referral activities, defunct commissioning
for the parts and not the whole, blighted lives and
demoralised, ineffective practitioners.
Dr Gillespie highlights the potential for ‘poppy love’ to
mature into a full-blown addictive affair and demonstrates
the long lineage that derives from our inattention to the
lessons of history and the lustful intentions and potential
dependencies of our synapses. Since more recent evidence
suggests that a major predictor for a consulter to have a
medically unexplained physical symptom (MUPS) is the
prescribing of an antidepressant and/or an opiate, we
should be thinking very hard about the major need to skill
up our front-line practitioners in psychological
mindedness, so that if any medicine is prescribed it is
appropriate and not a substitute for due care and concern.
Perhaps there is light at the end of the tunnel – or
nearer? The Improving Access to Psychological Therapies
(IAPT) Programme is going to make a major dent in the
general indifference of the NHS to brainmind issues.
The opportunities need to exist, through increasing
psychological skills training at undergraduate level, and
through contact with increasing numbers of psychological
therapists at postgraduate level, for many practitioners to
become skilled up in such interventions as Cognitive
Behaviour Therapy (CBT), that are proven to be effective in
working with many of the above patients.
Such training and exposure would also do much to improve
the wellbeing of those same practitioners in their day-day
work with those who are distressed.
100 liaison psychiatrists cannot visit everyone in hospital
with a psychological problem – we need all practitioners to
be able to liaise psychologically with their patients and
commissioners to understand how ‘mental’ permeates all NHS
work and agendas.
Yours Sincerely
Dr Chris Manning
References
Bair MJ. Robinson RL. Katon W. Kroenke K. (2003)
Depression and pain comorbidity: a literature review. Arch
Intern Med. Nov 10;163(20): pp2433-45.
Bair MJ. Robinson RL. Eckert GJ. Stang PE. (2004) Impact of
Pain on Depression Treatment Response in Primary Care.
Psychosom Med. Jan-Feb;66(1): pp17-22.
Bass C. Peveler R. House A. (2001) Somatoform disorders:
severe psychiatric illnesses neglected by psychiatrists. Br
J Psychiatry. Jul;179: pp11-14
Department of Health (1999). National Service Framework for
Mental Health: modern standards and service models. Crown
Copyright HSC 1999/223.
Gardner-Nix J. Principles of opioid use in chronic non-
cancer pain. CMAJ 2003;169(1):38-43
Goldberg RJ. Novack DH. Gask L. (1992) The recognition
and management of somatization: what is needed in primary
care training. Psychosomatics.Winter;33(1): pp55-61
Kroenke K. Swindle R. (2000) Cognitive Behavioural Therapy
for Somatization and Symptom Syndromes: a critical review.
Psychotherapy and Psychosomatics: (special article 69):
pp205–215
Kroenke K. (2006) Patients presenting with somatic
complaints: epidemiology, psychiatric co-morbidity and
management. International Journal of Methods in Psychiatric
Research Volume 12 Issue 1, Pages 34 - 43
Leino P. Magni G. (1993) Depressive and distress symptoms
as predictors of low back pain, neck-shoulder pain, and
other musculoskeletal morbidity: a 10-year follow-up of
metal industry employees. Pain;53:pp 89-91
Russell AS. Aaron SL. (2003) Opioids and Chronic Pain. CMAJ
October 28,; 169 (9)
Schon, D. (1987). Educating the reflective practitioner.
San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
Sharpe M. Mayou R. Seagroatt V. (1994) Why do doctors find
some patients difficult to help? Quarterly Journal of
Medicine, 87: 187-193
Von Korff M. Ormel J. Katon W. Lin EH. (1992) Disability
and depression among high utilisers of health care: a
longitudinal analysis. Arch Gen Psychiatry; 49: pp91–100.
Competing interests:
None declared
Competing interests: No competing interests
I wonder what happens when the patient comes back from the
neurosurgeon. What if he declines to operate. The value of imaging and
indeed surgery in chronic back pain is uncertain and MRI is expensive.
What if the patient has surgery but is no better?My patient population is
obviously skewed, but we see this scenario all the time.I would be
surprised if the pain clinic had not offered a multi-disciplinary approach
initially, including perhaps most importantly cognitive behavioural
therapy, psycho-social assessment, and controlled exercise.Opioid
analgesia however remains part of management in many cases. The risk of
addiction is small, and continued therapy depends absolutely on a
demonstrable improvement in analogue pain scores, and in patient's
function.
Competing interests:
None declared
Competing interests: No competing interests
"Loss" (not) of co-proxamol
Some years ago it was announced that the very useful analgesic co-
proxamol was going to be withdrawn, mainly, I believe, because of its
increasing use for suicide and as a result of pressure from Brussels.
Presumably because of strong objections, in the UK it never has been
withdrawn and is still available, though I believe each patient now has to
be named to the sole remaining manfacturer.
I have heard of more than one GP practice that does not believe it
has been reprieved and refuses to prescribe it, either under the
misapprehension that it is no longer available, or from personal
conviction that if it is it shouldn't be as it is a preparation the danger
of which outweighs its benefit.
Dr Gillespie's reference, uncorrected in the editing process, to the
"loss" of co-proxamol, makes me wonder if she and maybe others are unaware
that it has not been "lost".
Competing interests:
I suffer, intermittently, from post-Scheuermann arthritis for which co-proxamol provides relief not available from other non-opiate analgesics or NSAIDs, and thus I have considerable personal interest in its continued availability.
Competing interests: No competing interests