Alcohol consumption and alcohol counselling behaviour among US medical students: cohort study
BMJ 2008; 337 doi: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.a2155 (Published 07 November 2008) Cite this as: BMJ 2008;337:a2155All rapid responses
Rapid responses are electronic comments to the editor. They enable our users to debate issues raised in articles published on bmj.com. A rapid response is first posted online. If you need the URL (web address) of an individual response, simply click on the response headline and copy the URL from the browser window. A proportion of responses will, after editing, be published online and in the print journal as letters, which are indexed in PubMed. Rapid responses are not indexed in PubMed and they are not journal articles. The BMJ reserves the right to remove responses which are being wilfully misrepresented as published articles or when it is brought to our attention that a response spreads misinformation.
From March 2022, the word limit for rapid responses will be 600 words not including references and author details. We will no longer post responses that exceed this limit.
The word limit for letters selected from posted responses remains 300 words.
Frank and colleagues found a third (1668/4847) of American medical
students surveyed drank excessively, and this proportion changed little
over time(1). We conducted a cross sectional confidential questionnaire to
assess British medical students’ knowledge of the UK Government
recommended weekly drinking allowance (21 units for males and 14 units
for females) and to investigate how much these students were drinking each
week. We also explored the potential impact this might have on their
behaviour.
In December 2007 one hundred questionnaires were distributed to
consecutive second year medical students attending a lecture at St
George’s, University of London. The response rate was 87% (87/100). The
mean age of participants was 21 (range of 19-39 years) and 39% (34/87)
were male. Of the students who responded, 43% (37/87) did not drink
alcohol at all and 90% were aware of the Department of Health recommended
alcohol limits. However half (14/28) of the women and 45% (10/22) of the
men who had drunk alcohol in the previous week had exceeded these with 21%
of females and 23% of males drinking over twice the amount recommended by
the government. Similarly around half (42/87) had experienced memory loss
associated with the high levels of alcohol they had consumed and this was
significantly commoner in those who had engaged in regrettable sexual
activity (18/20) than those who hadn’t (24/ 65 p < 0.0001). A quarter
of male students had taken part in organised drinking competitions.
In line with the study by Frank et al(1), nearly a third (24/87) of
these medical students said they drank in excess of the recommended
guidelines.
As outlined in the 2007 publication ‘Medical Students: Professional
behaviour and Fitness to practice’, the General Medical Council now bases
students’ fitness to practice on their behaviour and not their health. It
is clear that as medical students and future doctors we have an example to
set and can expect our social behaviour to be far more scrutinised,
something we should consider the next time we head for the bar. (2)
As Aaron White said in his study of 2005,(3)
“If recreational drugs were tools then alcohol would be a
sledgehammer.”
1. Frank E, Elon L, Naimi T, Brewer R. Alcohol consumption and
alcohol counselling behaviour among US medical students: cohort study.
BMJ. 2008;337(a2155).
2. General Medical Council, Medical Schools Council. Medical
Students; professional behaviour and fitness to practice. In: Education,
editor. London, Manchester: Plain English Approved by the word centre;
2007.
3. White AM. What happened? Alcohol, Memory Blackouts and the Brain.
Alcohol Research and Health. 2003;27(2):186-96.
Michael John
3rd Year Medical Student,
Pippa Oakeshott
Reader in General Practice
St George’s, University of London
Correspondence to: Michael John <m0500393@sgul.ac.uk>
Competing interests:
None declared
Competing interests: No competing interests
We thank BMJ’s readers for their valuable and thought-provoking
responses to our article, and respond to them below.
We found that more training in alcohol-related counseling was a
strong independent predictor of increased counseling practices reported by
senior medical students.
Dr. Willenbring raises the possibility that this relationship may be
accounted for by additional training obtained through electives chosen by
students who were already interested in counseling. While this is a
reasonable hypothesis, in our understanding few medical schools offer many
such electives, while most offer varying degrees of counseling training as
part of their core medical education during pre-clinical and clinical
years. Further, there are only a few extra-scholastic alcohol-related
medical student electives (e.g., the Annenberg Physician Training Program
in Addiction Medicine, and the Betty Ford Summer Institute).
Our assertion is supported by additional analyses. We found that at
ward orientation, school-level percentages of reporting extensive training
ranged from 6 to 33%. During senior year the range was 19-46%. Between
these two time points, increases at individual schools ranged from a low
of 6 percentage points (28% to 34%), up to 25 percentage points (7% to
33%). Additionally, these data clearly slope -- medical schools
providing more alcohol training at orientation to wards were also more
likely to have provided more training to their graduating physicians.
We should also mention that the study cited by Dr. Willenbring
pertains to those already in clinical practice; our study was about
counseling among medical students -- two different populations, with
differing contexts that could mitigate the effects of training, including
a relative lack of time and/or lack of remuneration for counseling
services by practitioners.
Our study supports the importance of training as part of the
solution, though other systems changes are also needed to optimize
counseling in the world of clinical practice.
Finally, Drs. Utku and Checinski are to be commended for encouraging
their medical students to be healthier, and we would strongly encourage
U.S. and other countries’ medical schools to do likewise. We recommend
the following articles from our research as additional aids to justifying
and conducting health promotion among medical students:
Frank E. 2004. “Physician health and patient care.” Journal of the
American Medical Association, Vol. 291 (5), pg. 637.
Frank E, Elon E, Carrera JS, Hertzberg VS. 2007. Predictors of US
medical students’ prevention counseling practices. Preventive Medicine.
Vol. 44:1, pgs. 76-81.
Frank E, Elon L, Hertzberg V. 2007. Quantitative assessment of a 4-
year intervention that improved patient counseling through improving
medical student health. Medscape General Medicine. 2007 Jun 14;9(2):58.
http://www.medscape.com/viewarticle/557088
Frank E, Smith D, Fitzmaurice D. 2005. “A description and
qualitative assessment of a 4 year intervention to improve medical student
health.” Medscape General Medicine,
http://www.medscape.com/viewarticle/501770.
Competing interests:
None declared
Competing interests: No competing interests
Frank et al. provide a lucid and stimulation discussion of many
factors that influence alcohol interventions by US medical students.
However, we feel they do not go far enough. At St George's, University of
London, each medical (and other health care) student receives four
sessions about their own behaviour and health during the first semester.
The mixture of didactic and small group teaching includes peer learning
with the student union, an introduction to the counselling services and
orientation to the principles of disciplinary and fitness to study
procedures, all of which are examinable. There is discussion about
contentious issues such as "You need alcohol to make a social occasion
pleasurable" and all students learn the basics about illicit drugs and
their effects. Teachers come from a variety of medical disciplines and
other professions as it is very important for the topic to be seen by
colleagues and students alike as being of universal interest.
Once the courses diverge, only the medical students receive a further
six hours mixed teaching on their behaviour and health at the beginning of
their final year, covering additional learning objectives such as the role
of the General Medical Council in relation to their health and practice.
These issues are covered in their final written examination. All this
occurs in addition to substance misuse teaching in various modules of the
course (eg gastroenterology, psychiatry and general practice).
Our experience of this approach for more ten years is that
examination and normalisation of students' own attitudes and behaviours
towards substance misuse, both individually and in groups, are
prerequisite to their optimal subsequent treatment of patients' misuse of
alcohol and drugs.
Competing interests:
None declared
Competing interests: No competing interests
Frank et al. are to be commended for their article describing the
drinking habits and associated characteristics of medical students.
Although the authors exercised appropriate caution interpreting the
implications of this study, one particular finding has the potential for
misunderstanding. The finding in question is the association between
training (some/none vs. extensive) and frequency of counseling. Since
required "extensive" training in screening, assessment and management of
heavy drinking is rare in medical schools, students receiving extensive
training are most likely to have sought it out as an elective. Multiple
studies have documented that a subset of physicians are enthusiastic
supporters of such screening, but that training rarely induces those not
already so inclined to take it up (e.g. Anderson et al., Alcohol and
Alcoholism, 39:351-356, 2004.)
To conclude that implementing more
mandatory training in medical schools will increase screening and
counseling rates by physicians after graduation would be incorrect. It is
disheartening but not surprising that students' interest declined as a
result of medical school training. Clinical behavior is modeled and taught
by residents and attending physicians practicing in the way they are most
comfortable. It is probable that except for a few hardy souls interest
further declines during post-graduate medical training. Until clinical
training experiences routinely model and reinforce physician screening and
assessment of heavy drinking, didactic education alone is highly unlikely
to achieve the desired result.
Competing interests:
None declared
Competing interests: No competing interests
Greek University students abuse on drugs and alcohol
Illicit drug abuse, alcoholism, gambling addiction, are very widespread among young University students.
The situation is particularly precarious in Greece.
Even 6% of educated medical students assume benzodiazepines illegally.
Universities are correct to monitor student behaviour in order to prevent campus problems and further addiction extension.
References
http://greece.greekreporter.com/2016/05/19/teen-spirit-study-finds-greek...
http://greece.greekreporter.com/2016/05/19/greek-teens-with-bad-habits-s...
http://en.protothema.gr/young-greeks-are-champions-in-gambling-and-drink...
http://www.encephalos.gr/46-2-01e.htm
http://www.drugwarfacts.org/cms/Greece#sthash.Qns4Xf0h.dpbs
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3306042/
https://www.coe.int/T/DG3/Pompidou/Source/Documents/179914_Gender%20dime...
Competing interests: No competing interests