Intended for healthcare professionals

  1. Research
  2. Evidence for the...
  3. Evidence for the impact of quality improvement collaboratives: systematic review
Research

Evidence for the impact of quality improvement collaboratives: systematic review

BMJ 2008; 336 doi: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.39570.749884.BE (Published 26 June 2008) Cite this as: BMJ 2008;336:1491

Data supplement

  • Web extras

    Web extras

    Files in this Data Supplement:

Related articles

See more

Cited by...

  • Improving Services for HIV-Exposed Infants in Zambia and Cameroon Using a Quality Improvement Collaborative Approach
  • How, why and under what circumstances does a quality improvement collaborative build knowledge and skills in clinicians working with people with dementia? A realist informed process evaluation
  • Approaches, enablers, barriers and outcomes of implementing facility-based stillbirth and neonatal death audit in LMICs: a systematic review
  • HOW, WHY AND UNDER WHAT CIRCUMSTANCES DOES A QUALITY IMPROVEMENT COLLABORATIVE BUILD KNOWLEDGE AND SKILLS IN CLINICIANS WORKING WITH PEOPLE WITH DEMENTIA? A REALIST INFORMED PROCESS EVALUATION
  • Professionals experiences of using an improvement programme: applying quality improvement work in preschool contexts
  • Transforming Primary Care for Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual, and Transgender People: A Collaborative Quality Improvement Initiative
  • Evaluation of a learning collaborative to advance team-based care in Federally Qualified Health Centers
  • Saving 20 000 Days and Beyond: a realist evaluation of two quality improvement campaigns to manage hospital demand in a New Zealand District Health Board
  • Disrupting activities in quality improvement initiatives: a qualitative case study of the QuICR Door-To-Needle initiative
  • Quality improvement and emergency laparotomy care: what have we learnt from recent major QI efforts?
  • Motivating provision of high quality care: it is not all about the money
  • Improving laboratory test utilisation at the multihospital Yale New Haven Health System
  • Reducing pressure ulcers across multiple care settings using a collaborative approach
  • A quality improvement collaborative to build improvement capacity in regional primary care support organisations
  • Motivating Change: a grounded theory of how to achieve large-scale, sustained change, co-created with improvement organisations across the UK
  • Financial incentives linked to quality improvement projects in Swedish primary care: a model for improving quality of care
  • Tackling the wicked problem of health networks: the design of an evaluation framework
  • Improving developmental care in primary practice for disadvantaged children
  • Secondary prevention therapies in acute coronary syndrome and relation to outcomes: observational study
  • Using a composite morbidity score and cultural survey to explore characteristics of high proficiency neonatal intensive care units
  • Quality improvement collaborative aiming for Proactive HEAlthcare of Older People in Care Homes (PEACH): a realist evaluation protocol
  • Successfully reducing newborn asphyxia in the labour unit in a large academic medical centre: a quality improvement project using statistical process control
  • Building motivation to participate in a quality improvement collaborative in NHS hospital trusts in Southeast England: a qualitative participatory evaluation
  • How guiding coalitions promote positive culture change in hospitals: a longitudinal mixed methods interventional study
  • Are quality improvement collaboratives effective? A systematic review
  • Mental Health Screening Quality Improvement Learning Collaborative in Pediatric Primary Care
  • Clinical Variability in Neonatology: Context Matters
  • Impact of a primary healthcare quality improvement program on diabetes in Canada: evaluation of the Quality Improvement and Innovation Partnership (QIIP)
  • A National Quality Improvement Collaborative for the clinical use of outcome measurement in specialised mental healthcare: results from a parallel group design and a nested cluster randomised controlled trial
  • Impact of a provincial quality-improvement program on primary health care in Ontario: a population-based controlled before-and-after study
  • Implementing evidence-based practices improves neonatal outcomes
  • Multimethod study of a large-scale programme to improve patient safety using a harm-free care approach
  • Race and 30-Day Morbidity in Pediatric Urologic Surgery
  • Strategies for Improving Vaccine Delivery: A Cluster-Randomized Trial
  • Implementation of HIV treatment as prevention strategy in 17 Canadian sites: immediate and sustained outcomes from a 35-month Quality Improvement Collaborative
  • A Quality Improvement Collaborative to Improve Pediatric Primary Care Genetic Services
  • Qualitative evaluation of the Safety and Improvement in Primary Care (SIPC) pilot collaborative in Scotland: perceptions and experiences of participating care teams
  • SLUG Bug: Quality Improvement With Orchestrated Testing Leads to NICU CLABSI Reduction
  • Implementing a User-Driven Online Quality Improvement Toolkit for Cancer Care
  • Building Perinatal Case Manager Capacity Using Quality Improvement
  • Project JOINTS: What factors affect bundle adoption in a voluntary quality improvement campaign?
  • Inhaled Nitric Oxide Use in Neonates With Congenital Diaphragmatic Hernia
  • Systematic review of the application of the plan-do-study-act method to improve quality in healthcare
  • An educational approach to improve outcomes in acute kidney injury (AKI): report of a quality improvement project
  • Identifying strategies to improve diabetes care in Alberta, Canada, using the knowledge-to-action cycle
  • Results of a Mixed-Methods Evaluation of Partnerships for Health: A Quality Improvement Initiative for Diabetes Care
  • Pediatric Hospitalists Collaborate to Improve Timeliness of Discharge Communication
  • Effects of Facilitated Team Meetings and Learning Collaboratives on Colorectal Cancer Screening Rates in Primary Care Practices: A Cluster Randomized Trial
  • Changes in adverse event rates in hospitals over time: a longitudinal retrospective patient record review study
  • Competition in collaborative clothing: a qualitative case study of influences on collaborative quality improvement in the ICU
  • Learning from practice variation to improve the quality of care
  • The role of chief executive officers in a quality improvement initiative: a qualitative study
  • Determinants of success of quality improvement collaboratives: what does the literature show?
  • Improving primary care in Australia through the Australian Primary Care Collaboratives Program: a quality improvement report
  • Quality improvement collaboratives in the age of health informatics--new wine in new wineskins
  • The Australian Primary Care Collaboratives Program: improving diabetes care
  • Real-life costs and effects of an implementation program to increase thrombolysis in stroke
  • Findings from a national improvement collaborative: are improvements sustained?
  • Factors predicting change in hospital safety climate and capability in a multi-site patient safety collaborative: a longitudinal survey study
  • Reduction in Pediatric Identification Band Errors: A Quality Collaborative
  • More Black Box to Explore: How Quality Improvement Collaboratives Shape Practice Change
  • "PDSA-ADHD": A Newly Reported Syndrome
  • A Hospital-wide Quality-Improvement Collaborative to Reduce Catheter-Associated Bloodstream Infections
  • Effectiveness of collaborative improvement: evidence from 27 applications in 12 less-developed and middle-income countries
  • Preventing Bloodstream Infections: A Measurable National Success Story In Quality Improvement
  • Creating effective quality-improvement collaboratives: a multiple case study
  • Can evidence-based medicine and clinical quality improvement learn from each other?
  • Understanding the conditions for improvement: research to discover which context influences affect improvement success
  • Three success factors for continual improvement in healthcare: an analysis of the reports of improvement team members
Back to top