Analysis
What is missing from descriptions of treatment in trials and reviews?
BMJ 2008; 336 doi: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.39590.732037.47 (Published 26 June 2008) Cite this as: BMJ 2008;336:1472
Related articles
- Research Methods & Reporting Published: 13 August 2010; BMJ 341 doi:10.1136/bmj.c3852
- Research Methods & Reporting Published: 24 March 2010; BMJ 340 doi:10.1136/bmj.c869
- Research Methods & Reporting Published: 24 March 2010; BMJ 340 doi:10.1136/bmj.c332
- Analysis Published: 18 January 2007; BMJ 334 doi:10.1136/bmj.39045.396817.68
- Research Methods & Reporting Published: 21 July 2009; BMJ 339 doi:10.1136/bmj.b2700
- Research Published: 05 April 2011; BMJ 342 doi:10.1136/bmj.d1828
- Feature Published: 16 December 2012; BMJ 345 doi:10.1136/bmj.e8316
- Research Methods & Reporting Published: 09 January 2013; BMJ 346 doi:10.1136/bmj.e7586
- Editorial Published: 07 August 2013; BMJ 347 doi:10.1136/bmj.f4796
- Research Methods & Reporting Published: 29 September 2008; BMJ 337 doi:10.1136/bmj.a1655
- Research Methods & Reporting Published: 02 January 2015; BMJ 349 doi:10.1136/bmj.g7647
- Research Methods & Reporting Published: 07 March 2014; BMJ 348 doi:10.1136/bmj.g1687
- Research Methods & Reporting Published: 15 November 2013; BMJ 347 doi:10.1136/bmj.f6681
- Editorial Published: 11 September 2013; BMJ 347 doi:10.1136/bmj.f5212
- Research Published: 10 September 2013; BMJ 347 doi:10.1136/bmj.f3755
- Editorial Published: 25 June 2020; BMJ 369 doi:10.1136/bmj.m2253
See more
- Reforms to Mental Health Act aim to tackle poor care and racial inequalitiesBMJ January 13, 2021, 372 n103; DOI: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.n103
- GP life now: problems to tackle, opportunities to grasp, and changes to absorbBMJ January 13, 2021, 372 m4966; DOI: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.m4966
- Helen Salisbury: Respectful disagreementBMJ January 12, 2021, 372 n78; DOI: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.n78
- Rammya Mathew: We should use this moment of crisis to make significant gains in vaccine uptakeBMJ January 12, 2021, 372 n66; DOI: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.n66
- Covid-19 vaccinations in the community: five minutes with . . . Anuj PatelBMJ January 11, 2021, 372 n79; DOI: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.n79
Cited by...
- Reproducibility and transparency characteristics of oncology research evidence
- How and why a multifaceted intervention to improve adherence post-MI worked for some (and could work better for others): an outcome-driven qualitative process evaluation
- Identifying optimal frameworks to implement or evaluate digital health interventions: a scoping review protocol
- Criteria for academic promotion in medicine
- Evaluation of the completeness of intervention reporting in Cochrane surgical systematic reviews using the TIDieR-SR checklist: a cross-sectional study
- Risk factors for recurrent falls in older adults: a study protocol for a systematic review with meta-analysis
- Impact of a short version of the CONSORT checklist for peer reviewers to improve the reporting of randomised controlled trials published in biomedical journals: study protocol for a randomised controlled trial
- Do oncology researchers adhere to reproducible and transparent principles? A cross-sectional survey of published oncology literature
- Content reporting of exercise interventions in rotator cuff disease trials: results from application of the Consensus on Exercise Reporting Template (CERT)
- Do pharmacy intervention reports adequately describe their interventions? A template for intervention description and replication analysis of reports included in a systematic review
- Effectiveness and reporting standards of psychological interventions for improving short-term and long-term pain outcomes after total knee replacement: a systematic review
- Achieving reproducibility and accuracy in cancer mutation detection with whole-genome and whole-exome sequencing
- Uniformity in measuring adherence to reporting guidelines: the example of TRIPOD for assessing completeness of reporting of prediction model studies
- Reporting guidelines for health research: protocol for a cross-sectional analysis of the EQUATOR Network Library
- Quality of resistance training description in COPD trials: study protocol for a systematic review
- Are randomised control trials best for evaluating the effect of complex physical therapy interventions?
- Adherence to reporting guidelines and clinical trial registration policies in oncology journals: a cross-sectional review
- Understanding Implementation of Complex Interventions in Primary Care Teams
- Sackler Colloquium on Improving the Reproducibility of Scientific Research: Enhancing primary reports of randomized controlled trials: Three most common challenges and suggested solutions
- Process evaluation of the Data-driven Quality Improvement in Primary Care (DQIP) trial: quantitative examination of variation between practices in recruitment, implementation and effectiveness
- Evidence for Therapeutic Patient Education Interventions to Promote Cardiovascular Patient Self-Management: A Scientific Statement for Healthcare Professionals From the American Heart Association
- The quality of reports of medical and public health research from Palestinian institutions: a systematic review
- Consensus on Exercise Reporting Template (CERT): Explanation and Elaboration Statement
- Report on a pilot project to introduce a publications officer
- Reporting quality of randomised controlled trial abstracts among high-impact general medical journals: a review and analysis
- The TIDieR Checklist Will Benefit the Physical Therapy Profession
- Effectiveness of interventions to reduce ordering of thyroid function tests: a systematic review
- Improving reporting and utility of evaluations of complex interventions
- Bridging Translation by Improving Preclinical Study Design in AKI
- What's in a name? The challenge of describing interventions in systematic reviews: analysis of a random sample of reviews of non-pharmacological stroke interventions
- Activities to support the implementation of complex interventions as part of routine care: a review of the quality of reporting in cluster randomised controlled trials
- Preferred reporting items for systematic review and meta-analysis protocols (PRISMA-P) 2015: elaboration and explanation
- Poorly Cited Articles in Peer-Reviewed Cardiovascular Journals from 1997 to 2007: Analysis of 5-Year Citation Rates
- Reporting and Replicating Trials of Exercise-Based Cardiac Rehabilitation: Do We Know What the Researchers Actually Did?
- A systematic review of core implementation components in team ball sport injury prevention trials
- Better reporting of interventions: template for intervention description and replication (TIDieR) checklist and guide
- Assessment of the quality of reporting for treatment components in Cochrane reviews of acupuncture
- The completeness of intervention descriptions in published National Institute of Health Research HTA-funded trials: a cross-sectional study
- Developing a reporting guideline for social and psychological intervention trials
- Cascade diagrams for depicting complex interventions in randomised trials
- Descriptions of non-pharmacological interventions in clinical trials
- Poor description of non-pharmacological interventions: analysis of consecutive sample of randomised trials
- Declaration of transparency for each research article
- SPIRIT 2013 explanation and elaboration: guidance for protocols of clinical trials
- What football teaches us about researching complex health interventions
- Reporting guidelines: increasing standards in clinical research reporting
- Quality of descriptions of treatments: a review of published randomised controlled trials
- Uses and misuses of the STROBE statement: bibliographic study
- Reporting of eligibility criteria of randomised trials: cohort study comparing trial protocols with subsequent articles
- Taking healthcare interventions from trial to practice
- CONSORT 2010 Explanation and Elaboration: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials
- CONSORT 2010 Statement: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials
- The PRISMA statement for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses of studies that evaluate healthcare interventions: explanation and elaboration
- Writing a research article that is "fit for purpose": EQUATOR Network and reporting guidelines
- Using education to improve control of asthma in children
- Defining knowledge translation
- What Is the Strength of Evidence for Heart Failure Disease-Management Programs?
- Managing evidence-based knowledge: the need for reliable, relevant and readable resources
- Keeping Raw Data in Context
- Developing and evaluating complex interventions: the new Medical Research Council guidance