Intended for healthcare professionals

  1. News & Views
  2. What is missing from...
  3. What is missing from descriptions of treatment in trials and reviews?
Analysis

What is missing from descriptions of treatment in trials and reviews?

BMJ 2008; 336 doi: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.39590.732037.47 (Published 26 June 2008) Cite this as: BMJ 2008;336:1472

Related articles

See more

Cited by...

  • Achieving reproducibility and accuracy in cancer mutation detection with whole-genome and whole-exome sequencing
  • Uniformity in measuring adherence to reporting guidelines: the example of TRIPOD for assessing completeness of reporting of prediction model studies
  • Reporting guidelines for health research: protocol for a cross-sectional analysis of the EQUATOR Network Library
  • Quality of resistance training description in COPD trials: study protocol for a systematic review
  • Are randomised control trials best for evaluating the effect of complex physical therapy interventions?
  • Adherence to reporting guidelines and clinical trial registration policies in oncology journals: a cross-sectional review
  • Understanding Implementation of Complex Interventions in Primary Care Teams
  • Sackler Colloquium on Improving the Reproducibility of Scientific Research: Enhancing primary reports of randomized controlled trials: Three most common challenges and suggested solutions
  • Process evaluation of the Data-driven Quality Improvement in Primary Care (DQIP) trial: quantitative examination of variation between practices in recruitment, implementation and effectiveness
  • Evidence for Therapeutic Patient Education Interventions to Promote Cardiovascular Patient Self-Management: A Scientific Statement for Healthcare Professionals From the American Heart Association
  • The quality of reports of medical and public health research from Palestinian institutions: a systematic review
  • Consensus on Exercise Reporting Template (CERT): Explanation and Elaboration Statement
  • Report on a pilot project to introduce a publications officer
  • Reporting quality of randomised controlled trial abstracts among high-impact general medical journals: a review and analysis
  • The TIDieR Checklist Will Benefit the Physical Therapy Profession
  • Effectiveness of interventions to reduce ordering of thyroid function tests: a systematic review
  • Improving reporting and utility of evaluations of complex interventions
  • Bridging Translation by Improving Preclinical Study Design in AKI
  • What's in a name? The challenge of describing interventions in systematic reviews: analysis of a random sample of reviews of non-pharmacological stroke interventions
  • Activities to support the implementation of complex interventions as part of routine care: a review of the quality of reporting in cluster randomised controlled trials
  • Preferred reporting items for systematic review and meta-analysis protocols (PRISMA-P) 2015: elaboration and explanation
  • Poorly Cited Articles in Peer-Reviewed Cardiovascular Journals from 1997 to 2007: Analysis of 5-Year Citation Rates
  • Reporting and Replicating Trials of Exercise-Based Cardiac Rehabilitation: Do We Know What the Researchers Actually Did?
  • A systematic review of core implementation components in team ball sport injury prevention trials
  • Better reporting of interventions: template for intervention description and replication (TIDieR) checklist and guide
  • Assessment of the quality of reporting for treatment components in Cochrane reviews of acupuncture
  • The completeness of intervention descriptions in published National Institute of Health Research HTA-funded trials: a cross-sectional study
  • Developing a reporting guideline for social and psychological intervention trials
  • Cascade diagrams for depicting complex interventions in randomised trials
  • Descriptions of non-pharmacological interventions in clinical trials
  • Poor description of non-pharmacological interventions: analysis of consecutive sample of randomised trials
  • Declaration of transparency for each research article
  • SPIRIT 2013 explanation and elaboration: guidance for protocols of clinical trials
  • What football teaches us about researching complex health interventions
  • Reporting guidelines: increasing standards in clinical research reporting
  • Quality of descriptions of treatments: a review of published randomised controlled trials
  • Uses and misuses of the STROBE statement: bibliographic study
  • Reporting of eligibility criteria of randomised trials: cohort study comparing trial protocols with subsequent articles
  • Taking healthcare interventions from trial to practice
  • CONSORT 2010 Statement: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials
  • CONSORT 2010 Explanation and Elaboration: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials
  • The PRISMA statement for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses of studies that evaluate healthcare interventions: explanation and elaboration
  • Writing a research article that is "fit for purpose": EQUATOR Network and reporting guidelines
  • Using education to improve control of asthma in children
  • Defining knowledge translation
  • What Is the Strength of Evidence for Heart Failure Disease-Management Programs?
  • Managing evidence-based knowledge: the need for reliable, relevant and readable resources
  • Keeping Raw Data in Context
  • Developing and evaluating complex interventions: the new Medical Research Council guidance
Back to top