Editorials Darzi’s review of quality of care in the NHS BMJ 2008; 336 doi: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.39541.622917.80 (Published 17 April 2008) Cite this as: BMJ 2008;336:844 Article Related content Metrics Responses Peer review Related articles Paper Getting more for their dollar: a comparison of the NHS with California's Kaiser PermanenteCommentary: Funding is not the only factorCommentary: Same price, better careCommentary: Competition made them do it Published: 19 January 2002; BMJ 324 doi:10.1136/bmj.324.7330.135 Education And Debate Can the NHS learn from US managed care organisations? Published: 22 January 2004; BMJ 328 doi:10.1136/bmj.328.7433.223 Editor's Choice All the Cs Published: 17 April 2008; BMJ 336 doi:10.1136/bmj.39553.574525.47 See more Introductory Address Prov Med Surg J October 03, 1840, s1-1 (1) 1-4; DOI: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.s1-1.1.1 Report of the Meeting of the Eastern Branch of the Provincial Association at Bury St. Edmond's Prov Med Surg J October 03, 1840, s1-1 (1) 10-13; DOI: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.s1-1.1.10 Mr. Warburton's Bill for the Regulation of the Medical Profession Prov Med Surg J October 03, 1840, s1-1 (1) 13-15; DOI: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.s1-1.1.13 An Atlas of Plates, illustrative of the Principles and Practice of Obstetric Medicine and Surgery, with descriptive Letterpress Prov Med Surg J October 03, 1840, s1-1 (1) 4; DOI: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.s1-1.1.4 A Practical Treatise on the Diseases peculiar to Women, illustrated by Cases, &c Prov Med Surg J October 03, 1840, s1-1 (1) 4-5; DOI: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.s1-1.1.4-a
