Soft drinks, fructose consumption, and the risk of gout in men: prospective cohort study
BMJ 2008; 336 doi: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.39449.819271.BE (Published 07 February 2008) Cite this as: BMJ 2008;336:309All rapid responses
Rapid responses are electronic comments to the editor. They enable our users to debate issues raised in articles published on bmj.com. A rapid response is first posted online. If you need the URL (web address) of an individual response, simply click on the response headline and copy the URL from the browser window. A proportion of responses will, after editing, be published online and in the print journal as letters, which are indexed in PubMed. Rapid responses are not indexed in PubMed and they are not journal articles. The BMJ reserves the right to remove responses which are being wilfully misrepresented as published articles or when it is brought to our attention that a response spreads misinformation.
From March 2022, the word limit for rapid responses will be 600 words not including references and author details. We will no longer post responses that exceed this limit.
The word limit for letters selected from posted responses remains 300 words.
Authors Choi and Curhan pose a provocative hypothesis: that
consumption of
sugar sweetened soft drinks—and especially the fructose component—is
strongly associated with an increased risk of gout. However, the evidence
presented fails to convince that 1) the risks for gout posed by soft drink
consumption are uniquely due to the fructose component; and 2) these
beverages are significant risk factors for gout.
Sugar sweetened soft drinks are sweetened either with sucrose (world-
wide,
except for USA) or high fructose corn syrup (HFCS, predominantly USA).
Sucrose is a disaccharide of glucose and fructose covalently bonded
together;
HFCS is a blend of monosaccharide (free) glucose and fructose. In both
sweeteners, the glucose:fructose ratio is close to 1. To attribute to
fructose
the increased risk of incident gout with increased soft drink consumption
seems unreasonable, when each serving of soft drink contains an equivalent
amount of glucose.
The authors note that intake of caffeine, fructose, meats and high
fat dairy
foods tended to increase with increasing consumption of sugar sweetened
soft drinks (Table 1). However, they make no attempt to explain the
contradictory observation that BMI and intake of caffeine, meats and high
fat
dairy foods decrease with increasing consumption of free fructose. This
contradiction necessarily casts doubt on the quality of the data and/or
method of analysis, since nutritive sweeteners in soft drinks are half
fructose
and glucose. It is simply not possible for sugar sweetened soft drinks
and a
principal caloric constituent (fructose) to have divergent associations
with
intakes of caffeine, meats and high fat dairy foods.
Finally, it must be observed that the incidences of gout linked to
sugar
sweetened soft drinks reported in this paper do not appear unreasonable
when viewed against one
of the author’s own published data. 755 cases of gout were reported
during
12 years of the study in 46,393 male subjects—an incidence of 1.6%. This
is
consistent with the incidence of gout in the general population reported
by
Lawrence et al (1.3%), but is significantly lower than that reported
previously
by author Curhan et al (2.7%) (1,2).
Choi and Curhan reported that increasing intake of sugar sweetened
soft
drinks was associated with increased risk of gout (Table 2). However, the
effect was significant only at soft drink serving frequencies of 5-6/week
and
greater, which accounted for 143 of the 755 reported gout cases (19%). But
it
must be noted that the 0.3% incidence of gout represented by this serving
frequency (143 cases ÷ 46,393 subjects) represents a very small fraction
of
the 2.7% incidence reported by author Curhan for the general population
(2).
Furthermore, the significant fructose effect for “sweetened cola” and
“other
sweetened soft drinks” appeared only at serving frequencies of 1/day and
greater (Table 2). These serving frequencies represented even fewer (7%)
of
the 755 reported gout cases. And it must be further noted that the 0.1%
incidence of gout represented by this serving frequency represents an even
smaller fraction of Curhan’s 2.7% estimate for the general population (2).
Thus, incident gout attributed to elevated sugar sweetened soft drink
consumption of all types in this study is very low, indeed, and is of
questionable significance.
The hypotheses that fructose and caloric beverages play a unique role
in
obesity, diabetes and now gout have stirred great interest among
scientists
and the press, but to date no compelling evidence has appeared. Choi and
Curhan offer nothing new in support of these hypotheses.
REFERENCES
1. Lawrence RC, Felson DT, Helmick CG, Arnold LM, Choi H, Deyo RA,
Gabriel S, Hirsch R, Hochberg MC, et al. Estimates of the prevalence of
arthritis and other rheumatic conditions in the United States: Part II.
Arthritis
Rheum. 2008 Jan;58:26-35.
2. Kramer HM, Curhan G. The association between gout and nephrolithiasis:
the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey III, 1988-1994. Am J
Kidney Dis. 2002 Jul;40:37-42.
Competing interests:
The author is a consultant to
the food and beverage industry
in the area of nutritive
sweeteners. His clients include
research institutes, food
industry councils, trade
organizations and individual
companies.
Competing interests: No competing interests
It is true that certain fruit will cause Gout.
Of course Alcohol inhibits the excretion of both Uric and Oxalic Acids,
those that cause Gout, and makes the attack more lasting.
There is NO "Normal" Serum Uric Acid level.
This "threshold level" can vary from person to person and depends on
family genes and background.
The fruit involved is usually high in Oxalic Acid which will play a "Cox
and Box" game with Uric Acid. The one will replace the other in causing
pain.
To wit: Summer berry fruit, strawberries, raspberries, gooseberries,
rhubarb, pineapple, figs, Apricot, nutmeg, persimmon, dates, mango,
mangosteen, durian, Citrus peel (orange, lemon or lime) i.e. marmalade,
and add on chocolate, coffee and strong (uric acid) tea.
Apart from Mango and Durian these are all Oxalic Acid containing fruits.
These other two are full of nucleo-protein hence the breakdown through
Xanthine to Uric Acid.
"Diet DOES play a part (the main part) in the causation of Gout", and much
ordinary "common" Arthritis too, also Carpal Tunnel Syndrome, Achilles
tendonitis, Tennis and golfer's elbow, or forearm, backache, etc.
Which is the reverse of the sales-talk when Allopurinol was first came on
sale.
The Uric Acid comes from the breakdown, via Alanine and Guanine, of the
Nucleo-protein DNA in the high quality fish and meat protein, such that
has a highly nucleated content and histology. Remember the cross-section
of tongue?
The treatment still remains old fashioned and cheap:
Meadow Saffron (Colchicine) plus the German Benzbromarone ("Narcaricin") ?
not yet available in England.
Lots of water, maybe with some Effervescent Potassium Citrate and
abstaining from those luxury foods and alcohol, until better.
To prevent and get rid of most kidney stones then consume three times a
day a portion, cooked or un-cooked, of the large "White Radish" called
Moolie in the Super-markets (maybe Indian shops) or "Daikon" in Japanese
shops. Japanese must have few if any kidney stones or crystals in their
urine.
This is as old-fashioned as the Great Fire of London and was recommended
by Nicholas Culpeper in his Herbal ? 1662. It works every time. Look it
up.
Anecdote: Two mangoes a day bring on stiffness of my fingers in four
days. One mango a day will take 21 days to do the same.
Competing interests:
None declared
Competing interests: No competing interests
Gurus of yester frowned on steak and wine
.........................................................
The old gouts indulged on the sly winking," All's fine "
.........................................................
Labcoats of today frown on sucrose and fruit
..........................................................
The old gout in me blasts, " My foot "
...........................................................
On gouty or goutless times the Middle Path is the ideal.
Competing interests:
None declared
Competing interests: No competing interests
SIR,
with great interest I read the report of Drs. Choi and Curhan "Soft
drinks, fructose consumption...". It's a nice study that presents a
reasonably well justified epidemiological evidence. However, attributing
the risk specifically to sugar content of the soft drinks does appear too
preliminary.
First of all, what we know as 'soft drinks' contain much more than
just sugar. They, invariably, contain a large amount of the E-labeled food
additives such as preservatives, coloring agents, flavors said to be
'nature identical' etc (see, for instance, the impressive Wikipedia list
of them [1]). The list of papers in MEDLINE dealing with safety concerns
over food additives is not less impressive, let's just mention here the
most recent title [2].
Given the insidious chemical nature of most of these additives, I
would not be surprised, as a biochemist, if they would induce considerable
inflammation, among other effects. This conclusion can be inferred by
simply looking at the frightening chemical formulae of these additives
that remind rather of oil chemistry and oil procesing and not so much of
food.
Now, the matter of oliphant: it's rather the elephant was meant, but
in a hostile sense. The elephant as in 'the elephant in the room' which
has to be noticed, somehow... As suggested by the original [3], the
'oliphant' is not something very evil in itself but becomes so in the
hands of some people.
REFERENCES
[1] http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Food_additive,
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_food_additives
[2]. Joint FAO/WHO Expert Committee on Food Additives.Evaluation of
certain food additives and contaminants.World Health Organ Tech Rep Ser.
2007;(940):1-92, 1 p following 94. PMID: 17687927
[3] J. R. R. Tolkien (1987), The Two Towers, vol. 2, The Lord of the
Rings, Boston ISBN 0-395-08254-4
Competing interests:
None declared
Competing interests: No competing interests
Reflections on Omission of Dietary Salt in Recent Gout-Fructose Study
Choi and Curhan have presented compelling prospective data which
suggests a strong association between fructose consumption and the risk of
gout in North American men [1]. Whatever the validity of their
conclusions, the team deserves our unanimous respect and gratitude for
attempting to identify a dietary cause of a chronic inflammatory
condition: after all, scores of us who do - or will - suffer from one or
more inflammatory diseases know it is all too common for our physicians to
routinely and with surprising promptness ascribe our ailments not to
dietary indiscretion, not to environmental factors, but to either medical
ignorance, genetics, or, what is most disturbing and really quite
insulting, our psychological state. For our part, we demand a rather more
scientific answer to our inquiry, and Choi and Curhan have nobly attempted
to meet this reasonable demand.
That being said, we must expose a rather unfortunate oversight made
by our etiologists. Inasmuch as ordinary salt commonly, but not always
[2], causes an increase in the renal excretion of water [3, 4] and a
corresponding increase in fluid intake [3, 4], one can justifiably wonder
if in neglecting the potential impact of salted foods and beverages on
fructose consumption, Choi and Curhan have overlooked an important
variable. I am not at all suggesting that salt per se is a cause of
inflammation, whether it be the inflammation of arthtritis, colitis,
psoriasis, ad infinitum. Sodium chloride is rapidly excreted by healthy
kidneys, and the association between salt consumption and hypertension, a
condition often encountered in the arthritic [5], remains controversial,
some studies showing a weak association, others an apparently strong
association.
I submit that the very reason a clear association between
hypertension and salt consumption has not yet been made may well be the
reason which goes far to explain why Choi and Curhan's fructose may be
nothing more than a helpless scapegoat [6] in a search for a cause of
gout. The reason is, that our reviewers, researchers and etiolgists have,
with a few exceptions [2], habitually neglected in their work on salt and
human health to carefully dissociate NaCl from those many foods and
beverages which are ordinarily salted [3, 7]; they have also occasionally
committed the grave error of validating the findings of these specious
studies in subsequent work in which salt was administered in a
standardized fashion - but on hypertensive, rather than healthy subjects
[4]. If it can be established that salt itself is innocuous [2, 8], we
must explore the possible role those foods and drinks ordinarily salted,
the concentrated starches, the processed animal products, the packaged
convenience foods, might themselves have in the etiology of inflammation,
apart from their sodium chloride component. It would seem reasonable to
begin such investigations with special reference to food and drinks
sharing common properties: for instance, by exploring the possible role
additives and chemicals [9] or techniques used in preparing these foods
and drinks for the diner (e.g., sustained application of high heat,
resulting in oxidation of unstable fats and distortion of sensitive
proteins), might have.
I find it rather striking, incidentally, that Choi and Curhan found
those subjects with the highest sugar sweetened soft drink consumption
consumed more meat, high-fat dairy, and caffeine, and less low-fat dairy
[1, Table 1]. This suggests that soda drinkers are less apt to act on
current health recommendations, and summons the thought whether one or
more of these transgressions might be of greater significance than the
consumption of our beleaguered monosaccharide: perhaps a violation of one
of the above, or one not identified by Choi and Curhan (e.g., recreational
drug use), or perhaps a cause not yet found by modern science.
There is no doubt that in studies which fail to dissociate salt from
the foods and drinks in which it is commonly found, fluid intake
increases; and, further, that many of us opt not for ordinary water but
for soda or fruit juice to allay the resultant thirst. But this hardly
proves that fructose or salt consumption causes obesity [3] or gout,
however tempting it might thus be to implicate one or the other.
To close, the BMJ is to be commended for furnishing the general
public this platform for discussion and debate on subjects which should
intimately concern each member of the human race, namely, disease,
nutrition, and the pursuit of health and graceful aging. I personally
thank them for affording me this opportunity to contribute to this forum
in a small but meaningful way.
REFERENCES
1. Choi HK, Curhan G. Soft drinks, fructose consumption, and the
risk of gout in men: prospective cohort study. BMJ. 2008; 336: 309-312.
2. Luft FC, Fineberg NS, Sloan RS, Hunt JN. The effect of dietary
sodium and protein on urine volume and water intake. J Lab Clin Med. 1983
Apr; 101(4): 605-10.
3. He FJ, Marrero NM, MacGregor GA. Salt intake is related to soft
drink consumption in children and adolescents: a link to obesity?
Hypertension. 2008 Mar; 51(3): 629-34.
4. He FJ, Markandu ND, Sagnella GA, MacGregor GA. Effect of salt
intake on renal excretion of water in humans. Hypertension. 2001; 38:
317–320.
5. Panoulas VF, Metsios GS, Pace AV, John H, Treharne GJ, Banks MJ,
Kitas GD. Hypertension in rheumatoid arthritis. Rheumatology (Oxford).
2008 May 29. [Epub ahead of print].
6. In this connection, see John White's earlier reply to this
article in which he ably identifies some disturbing anomalies in the
research lending itself to the arthritis-fructose theory.
7. Cutler JA, Follmann D, Allender PS. Randomized trials of sodium
reduction: an overview. Am J Clin Nutr. 1997 Feb; 65(2 Suppl): 643S-651S.
8. Beevers DG, Hawthorne VM, Padfield PL. Salt and blood pressure
in Scotland. Br Med J. 1980 Sep 6; 281(6241): 641-2.
9. See Ivan Toshin's foregoing Rapid Response of February 4, 2008,
entitled, "Did we notice the 'oliphant'?"
Competing interests:
None declared
Competing interests: No competing interests