Counting CD4 cells cheaply: diagnostic accuracy study
BMJ 2007; 335 doi: https://doi.org/10.1136/sbmj.0712464 (Published 01 December 2007) Cite this as: BMJ 2007;335:0712464- Kirsten Patrick, former Roger Robinson editorial registrar1
- 1BMJ
This month's paper
"Diagnostic accuracy and clinical utility of a simplified low cost method of counting CD4 cells with flow cytometry in Malawi: diagnostic accuracy study" by Calman A MacLennan and colleagues (BMJ 2007;335:190 doi: 10.1136/bmj.39268.719780.BE).
Abstract
Objectives-To assess the diagnostic accuracy and clinical utility of a simplified low cost method for measuring absolute and percentage CD4 counts with flow cytometry.
Design-A CD4 counting method (Blantyre count) using a CD4 and CD45 antibody combination with reduced blood and reagent volumes. Diagnostic accuracy was assessed by measuring agreement of the index test with two other assays (TruCount and FACSCount). Clinical utility was investigated by comparing CD4 counts with the new assay with WHO clinical staging in patients with HIV.
Setting-Research laboratories and antiretroviral therapy clinic at a medical school and large government hospital in southern Malawi.
Participants-Assay comparisons were performed on consecutive blood samples sent for CD4 counting from 129 patients with HIV. Comparison of CD4 count with staging was conducted on 253 consecutive new patients attending the antiretroviral therapy clinic.
Main outcome measures-Limits of agreement with 95% confidence intervals between index test and reference standards.
Results-The limits of agreement for Blantyre count and TruCount were excellent (cell count -48.9 to 27.0 cells/micro l for absolute counts in the CD4 range >400 cells/micro l and -2.42% to 2.37% for CD4 percentage). The assay was affordable with reagent costs per test of $0.44 (0.22 pound; 0.33 euro) for both absolute count and CD4 percentage, and $0.11 for CD4 percentage alone. Of 193 patients with clinical stage I or II disease, who were ineligible for antiretroviral therapy by clinical staging criteria, 73 (38%) had CD4 counts >200 cells/micro l. By contrast, 12 (20%) of 60 patients with stage III or IV disease had CD4 counts <350 cells/micro l.
Conclusions-This simplified …
Log in
Log in using your username and password
Log in through your institution
Subscribe from £184 *
Subscribe and get access to all BMJ articles, and much more.
* For online subscription
Access this article for 1 day for:
£50 / $60/ €56 (excludes VAT)
You can download a PDF version for your personal record.