Intended for healthcare professionals

  1. Research
  2. Financial ties and...
  3. Financial ties and concordance between results and conclusions in meta-analyses: retrospective cohort study
Research

Financial ties and concordance between results and conclusions in meta-analyses: retrospective cohort study

BMJ 2007; 335 doi: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.39376.447211.BE (Published 06 December 2007) Cite this as: BMJ 2007;335:1202

Data supplement

Related articles

See more

Cited by...

  • Ten years later: a review of the US 2009 institute of medicine report on conflicts of interest and solutions for further reform
  • Improving the transparency of meta-analyses with interactive web applications
  • Association of food industry ties with findings of studies examining the effect of dairy food intake on cardiovascular disease and mortality: systematic review and meta-analysis
  • Determinants of citation in the literature on diesel exhaust exposure and lung cancer: a citation analysis
  • Preferred reporting items for systematic review and meta-analysis of diagnostic test accuracy studies (PRISMA-DTA): explanation, elaboration, and checklist
  • Reporting of financial conflicts of interest by Canadian clinical practice guideline producers: a descriptive study
  • Authorship, plagiarism and conflict of interest: views and practices from low/middle-income country health researchers
  • Dissemination of 2014 dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) trial results: a systematic review of scholarly and media attention over 7 months
  • Technology Transfer: From the Research Bench to Commercialization: Part 2: The Commercialization Process
  • Epidemiological characteristics and methodological quality of meta-analyses on diabetes mellitus treatment: a systematic review
  • Preferred reporting items for systematic review and meta-analysis protocols (PRISMA-P) 2015: elaboration and explanation
  • The Cochrane Collaboration 20 years in
  • The Drug Facts Box: Improving the communication of prescription drug information
  • Content area experts as authors: helpful or harmful for systematic reviews and meta-analyses?
  • Discordance Between Conclusions Stated in the Abstract and Conclusions in the Article: Analysis of Published Randomized Controlled Trials of Systemic Therapy in Lung Cancer
  • Reporting of conflicts of interest from drug trials in Cochrane reviews: cross sectional study
  • Consistency in the Analysis and Reporting of Primary End Points in Oncology Randomized Controlled Trials From Registration to Publication: A Systematic Review
  • Ethics and Technology Transfer: Patients, Patents, and Public Trust
  • Relationships Between Authorship Contributions and Authors' Industry Financial Ties Among Oncology Clinical Trials
  • The PRISMA statement for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses of studies that evaluate healthcare interventions: explanation and elaboration
  • Accounting for uncertainty about investigator bias: disclosure is informative: How could disclosure of interests work better in medicine, epidemiology and public health?
  • Preferential publication of editorial board members in medical specialty journals
  • Relation of study quality, concordance, take home message, funding, and impact in studies of influenza vaccines: systematic review
  • Differential Citation Rates of Major Cardiovascular Clinical Trials According to Source of Funding: A Survey From 2000 to 2005
  • Regulating spoons
  • Consider palliative coronary intervention
  • Delve deeper to find the links
  • Influence of pharmaceutical funding on the conclusions of meta-analyses
Back to top