Letters Medical migration

Full house

BMJ 2007; 335 doi: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.39353.475706.BE (Published 04 October 2007) Cite this as: BMJ 2007;335:684
  1. Jorge Zimbron, academic foundation year 2
  1. Institute of Psychiatry at the Maudsley, King's College, London SE5 8AF
  1. jorgezimbron{at}doctors.net.uk

Winyard argues that the BMA is being “ambiguous” in criticising both the medical training application service (MTAS) fiasco and the changes in immigration policy.1 He implies that it is incongruent to do so, as stopping immigration is necessary for the system to run adequately. Although this is somewhat true, the BMA is not lobbying for the rights of future immigrants, but …

View Full Text

Log in

Log in through your institution


* For online subscription