News GMC clears GP accused of giving court “junk science” on MMR vaccine BMJ 2007; 335 doi: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.39322.418831.DB (Published 30 August 2007) Cite this as: BMJ 2007;335:416 Article Related content Metrics Responses Peer review Related articles News Courts are being used “to litigate a scientific debate,” counsel claims Published: 24 February 2010; BMJ 340 doi:10.1136/bmj.c1120 News Roundup [abridged Versions Appear In The Paper Journal] Judge overrules mothers' objections to MMR vaccine Published: 19 June 2003; BMJ 326 doi:10.1136/bmj.326.7403.1351-a News GMC clears GP accused of giving court “junk science” on MMR vaccine Published: 06 September 2007; BMJ 335 doi:10.1136/bmj.39328.514664.AD See more Commentary: We came to an overwhelming and uniform opinion that these reports do not show colitis BMJ November 09, 2011, 343 d6979; DOI: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.d6979 Commentary: I see no convincing evidence of “enterocolitis,” “colitis,” or a “unique disease process” BMJ November 09, 2011, 343 d6985; DOI: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.d6985 Institutional research misconduct BMJ November 09, 2011, 343 d7284; DOI: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.d7284 Pathology reports solve “new bowel disease” riddle BMJ November 09, 2011, 343 d6823; DOI: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.d6823 Is research safe in their hands? BMJ January 19, 2011, 342 d284; DOI: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.d284 Cited by... GPs and junk scienceFulltext PDF
