Time to stop sniffing the air: snapshot surveyBMJ 2006; 333 doi: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.39015.726690.47 (Published 21 December 2006) Cite this as: BMJ 2006;333:1295
- Chris Johnson, consultant anaesthetist,
- Neville W Goodman, consultant anaesthetist
- Correspondence to: N W Goodman
- Accepted 11 October 2006
Objective To determine whether the phrase “sniffing the morning air” is useful in positioning patients for tracheal intubation.
Design Snapshot survey.
Setting Teaching hospital.
Participants 21 anaesthetists.
Main outcome measures Angles of neck, line of sight, and hip to shoulder, as measured on a photograph.
Results Angles ranged widely, especially line of sight: 7°-37° with horizontal.
Conclusions As patients are positioned supine, rather than standing, the phrase is unhelpful; an explicit description of head position would be better.
Generations of anaesthetists have been taught Ivan Magill's descriptions “sniffing the morning air” and “draining a pint of beer” to help them to position a patient's head for tracheal intubation.1 A more explicit description is that the neck is flexed forward to about 35° using one pillow under the head, which is extended on the neck so that the face is tilted back 15° from the horizontal.1 “Sniffing” is commonly used in teaching material2 but features less commonly in research papers; Lim et al mention the sniffing position, although they cite no reference nor describe the position.3
Cattermole “wondered whether those being taught intubation ever had sniffed the morning air [themselves].”4 He asked 40 non-medical undergraduates and graduates aged 18-29 to adopt one of the two positions referred to by Magill. From his findings, he concluded that the “drinking” illustration would be better for teaching, because it was a more accurate description and more relevant to young people, but “sniffing” is the term more widely used in teaching.
We wondered whether anaesthetists, who are skilled at intubation, would demonstrate the position well. We wondered whether Magill's description was, in fact, useful at all.
Participants and methods
We asked all anaesthetists attending a departmental audit meeting, singly and unseen, whether they had heard the phrase “sniffing the morning air.” We then asked them to stand upright, side on to a camera, and to adopt the position. We took a single digital photograph (Canon PowerShot S70) and three measurements (Screen Protractor v3.2, Iconico Inc): the angle of the neck with the vertical, the line of sight with the horizontal, and the hip to shoulder line with the vertical (figure)⇓.
All 21 anaesthetists (14 career grades and 7 trainees) were familiar with the phrase “sniffing the morning air.” The median angle of the neck from the vertical was 25° (interquartile range 16.5°-28.5°; full range 14°-41°); the median angle of line of sight from the horizontal was 19° (14°-25°; 7°-37°). Fifteen anaesthetists stood more or less upright, with a hip to shoulder angle of −7° to −1°, but six anaesthetists leaned forward at angles from 3° to 12°.
The range of angles observed makes the description “sniffing the morning air” seem to be of little use. Like Cattermole,4 we measured our angles with the subjects standing, but intubation is performed with patients supine. Six of the anaesthetists leaned their bodies forward—the equivalent of putting a pillow under the shoulders, which makes intubation more, not less, difficult. In fact, patients often arrive in the anaesthetic room in this position. They usually find it uncomfortable, and moving the pillow from under the shoulders to under the head makes them not only more comfortable but better positioned for controlling the airway.
Anaesthesia owes a great debt to Magill, but there seems little point in continuing to use his description of the best patient position when even those familiar with airway control demonstrate it so variably. It is better to advise putting a pillow under the head to flex the neck, and then extending the head on the neck.
Contributors: The project was CJ's idea. NWG took the photos and measured the angles. Both wrote the paper and will act as guarantors. Neither has anything against Sir Ivan Magill, who was more skilled at intubation than they will ever be.
Funding: No funding was sought.
Competing interests: None declared.
Ethical approval was not sought; the photographs were taken at a departmental clinical governance meeting after discussion about teaching intubation. There was no judgment of performance or assessment of any of the anaesthetists, all members of the department who attended that meeting.