The philosophy of the medical case
BMJ 2006; 332 doi: https://doi.org/10.1136/sbmj.0604174b (Published 01 April 2006) Cite this as: BMJ 2006;332:0604174b- Hemang Yadav, fifth year medical student1
- 1Imperial College, London
I once met a girl with six toes. Rather, she had five and a half toes— a toe-ette emerged innocuously from her otherwise normal hallux. Was I surprised by this medical curiosity? Certainly. Was I disturbed? Of course. Did I rush and document my finding in peer reviewed journals? Definitely not. To me such an activity seems, frankly, quite dull. Yet that is precisely what many doctors around the world regularly seem to do. The collection of case reports they produce is a who's who of the wild and the wacky in our wards today. What are these reports and why are they written?
Published case reports originate from the days when you described something; you got a disease named after you. Along the way, the authors may criticise the lesser mortals who preceded them, but lacked their superior skills of deduction. They then reveal their earth shattering diagnosis. “This patient has the first recorded case of Zollinger-Ellinson syndrome presenting as gallstone ileus impacting in a Meckel's diverticulum,” or …
Log in
Log in using your username and password
Log in through your institution
Subscribe from £184 *
Subscribe and get access to all BMJ articles, and much more.
* For online subscription
Access this article for 1 day for:
£50 / $60/ €56 (excludes VAT)
You can download a PDF version for your personal record.