Proteinuria, impaired kidney function, and adverse outcomes in people with coronary disease: analysis of a previously conducted randomised trialBMJ 2006; 332 doi: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.38814.566019.2F (Published 15 June 2006) Cite this as: BMJ 2006;332:1426
- Marcello Tonelli, assistant professor ()1,
- Powell Jose, medical student2,
- Gary Curhan, associate professor3,
- Frank Sacks, professor4,
- Eugene Braunwald, professor5,
- Marc Pfeffer, professor, Cholesterol and Recurrent Events (CARE) Trial Investigators5
- 1 Department of Medicine, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB, Canada T6G2C3
- 2 Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, USA
- 3 Department of Epidemiology, Harvard School of Public Health, Boston, MA, USA
- 4 Department of Nutrition, Harvard School of Public Health
- 5 Cardiovascular Division, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston
- Correspondence to: M Tonelli
- Accepted 1 April 2006
Objectives To determine whether data on proteinuria are useful for refining estimates of risk based on kidney function alone, and whether the results of kidney function tests can be a useful adjunct to data on proteinuria.
Design Analysis of data from a randomised trial. Impaired kidney function was defined as low glomerular filtration rate (< 60 ml/min/1.73 m2) and proteinuria ( 1+ protein) on dipstick urinalysis.
Setting Study of cholesterol and recurrent events: a randomised trial of pravastatin 40 mg daily versus placebo.
Participants 4098 men and women with previous myocardial infarction.
Main outcome measures All cause mortality and cardiovascular events.
Results 371 participants died in nearly 60 months of follow-up. Compared with participants without proteinuria or impaired kidney function, patients with both characteristics were at high risk (hazard ratio 2.39, 95% confidence interval 1.72 to 3.30), and those with only proteinuria or only impaired kidney function were at intermediate risk (1.69, 1.32 to 2.16; 1.41, 1.12 to 1.79, respectively) of dying from any cause. The results were similar for cardiovascular outcomes, including new cases of heart failure, stroke, and coronary death or non-fatal myocardial infarction. A graded increase in the risk of all cause mortality was seen for severity of renal impairment and degree of proteinuria by dipstick.
Conclusions The presence or absence of proteinuria on dipstick urinalysis may be used to refine estimates of risk based on kidney function alone.
Contributors MP had the idea for the analysis, and MT designed the detailed analysis plan, with input from MP and GC. MT wrote the first draft and is guarantor. All authors helped to interpret the data and to revise the article.
Funding MT was funded by a population health investigator award from the Alberta Heritage Foundation for Medical Research and by the Canadian Institutes of Health Research. PJ was funded by the Stanley J Sarnoff Endowment for Cardiovascular Science.
Competing interests None declared.
Ethical approval The institutional review board at the University of Alberta, Canada.