Rapid responses are electronic comments to the editor. They enable our users to debate issues raised in articles published on bmj.com. A rapid response is first posted online. If you need the URL (web address) of an individual response, simply click on the response headline and copy the URL from the browser window. A proportion of responses will, after editing, be published online and in the print journal as letters, which are indexed in PubMed. Rapid responses are not indexed in PubMed and they are not journal articles. The BMJ reserves the right to remove responses which are being wilfully misrepresented as published articles.
In an ideal world the benefit of parenteral penicillin given as an
emergency measure in meningococcal meningitis is clearly of great
importance and deserves to be definitively established by a controlled
However, given that over the years significant numbers of doctors
have been sued,successfully,for vast damages for having failed for one
reason or another to administer parenteral penicillin in such cases,it is
difficult to see how such a trial could ever be carried out.
Which Doctor is going to risk the legal trauma involved in refraining
from such treatment, and which lawyer is going to allow such a
financially ruinous opinion as might result from demotion of parenteral
therapy to see the light of day?
We have become, I fear, for better or worse, enmeshed in a culture
where such questions are usually decided by trial in the Courts, not the
controlled trials of clinical medicine!