Early determinants of physical activity in adolescence: prospective birth cohort studyBMJ 2006; 332 doi: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.38776.434560.7C (Published 27 April 2006) Cite this as: BMJ 2006;332:1002
- Pedro C Hallal, associate professor1 (, )
- Jonathan C K Wells, reader2,
- Felipe F Reichert, PhD student1,
- Luciana Anselmi, PhD student3,
- Cesar G Victora, professor1
- 1 Postgraduate Program in Epidemiology, Federal University of Pelotas, Duque de Caxias 250 3## piso 96030- 002 Pelotas-RS, Brazil
- 2 MRC Childhood Nutrition Centre, Institute of Child Health, London
- 3 Postgraduate Program in Epidemiology, Federal University of Pelotas; Institute of Psychology, Federal University of Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil
- Correspondence to: P C Hallal
- Accepted 15 February 2006
Objective To examine the effects of early social, anthropometric, and behavioural variables on physical activity in adolescence.
Design Prospective birth cohort study.
Setting Pelotas, southern Brazil.
Participants 4453 adolescents aged 10-12 years participating in the Pelotas 1993 birth cohort study (follow-up rate 87.5%).
Main outcome measures Sedentary lifestyle (< 300 minutes of physical activity per week) and median physical activity score (minutes per week).
Results The prevalence of a sedentary lifestyle at age 10-12 years was 58.2% (95% confidence interval 56.7% to 59.7%). Risk factors for a sedentary lifestyle in adolescence were female sex, high family income at birth, high maternal education at birth, and low birth order. Weight gain variables at ages 0-1, 1-4, and 4-11 years and overweight at age 1 or 4 years were not significant predictors of physical activity. Levels of physical activity at age 4 years, based on maternal report, were inversely related to a sedentary lifestyle at age 10-12 years.
Conclusions Physical activity in adolescence does not seem to be programmed by physiological factors in infancy. A positive association between birth order and activity may be due to greater intensity of play in childhood and adolescence. Tracking of physical activity from age 4 to 10-12 years, however, suggests that genetic factors or early habit formation may be important.
The benefits of physical activity on physical and mental health throughout life are well established.12 Leading health agencies have included physical activity in their public health agendas.3 Although most chronic diseases associated with physical inactivity typically occur in middle aged and older adults, it is increasingly understood that their development starts in childhood and adolescence.4 This highlights the need for studies of determinants of physical activity in childhood and adolescence, taking into account that physical activity is a complex behaviour, influenced by several linked factors.5
Most studies of physical activity among adolescents are cross sectional. For identifying possible early determinants of physical activity behaviour, prospective studies are required. Interest in the idea of “programming” of health status by factors operating in early life is widespread.6 7 8 9 Most studies have focused on physiological outcomes, such as blood pressure,10 11 diabetes,12 obesity,13 and body composition.14 Behaviour might also be programmed in early life, as pointed out by Freud.15 We examined the effect of early social, anthropometric, and behavioural variables on levels of physical activity in 10-12 year olds.
Pelotas (population 320 000) is located in southern Brazil in a relatively developed part of the country. In 1993, mothers of all hospital born children were invited to join a birth cohort study. Home births account for less than 1% of all deliveries. Mothers were interviewed soon after delivery for personal, socioeconomic, and behavioural variables. Family income was divided into five groups (≤ 1, 1.1-3, 3.1-6, 6.1-10, > 10 minimum wages per month). Mother's education was defined as the highest degree completed (0, 1-4, 5-8, ≥ 9 years). Prepregnancy weight was obtained by self report from the mothers, and the mothers' height was measured at the hospital with portable stadiometers (precision 1 mm). The prepregnancy body mass index was then calculated and divided into four categories (< 20, 20-24.9, 25-29.9, ≥ 30). Birth order was categorised into 1, 2 or 3, and ≥ 4. Newborn infants were weighed using scales with a precision of 100 g, and birth weight was categorised into three groups (< 2500, 2500-3499, ≥ 3500 g). The methods are described in detail elsewhere.16
The cohort has been followed on several occasions. In the present analysis we use data from four follow-up visits.
One year and four years
At follow-up visits at one and four years, all low birthweight (< 2500 g) children (n = 510) and a systematic sample of 20% of the remainder were sought; 1363 children were seen at one year and 1273 at four years. Analyses were weighted to compensate for the over-sampling of low birthweight children. Weight gains (kg) from birth to 1 year, 1-4 years, and 4-11 years were categorised into quartiles. Overweight at 1 and 4 years was defined as weight for height Z scores greater than 2 according to the reference standard of the National Center for Health Statistics.17
Behavioural substudy at four years
A randomly selected subsample of 634 children followed up at four years was visited. At this visit the mother completed the child behaviour checklist questionnaire.18 We used two variables on the basis of the mother's self report in the present paper: the child's level of physical activity compared with children of the same age (below average, on average, above average) and how well the child performed at sports activities (below average, on average, above average).
In 2004-5 we sought all cohort members through a school census, as well as a population census in which about 100 000 households in the urban area were visited in search of adolescents born in 1993. Detailed data were collected on physical activity, including mode of transportation to and from school, physical education classes, and leisure time activities. We defined a sedentary lifestyle as less than 300 minutes of physical activity per week, in accordance with current guidelines for adolescents.19 We did not include physical education classes because these were carried out only two or three times a week, with low intensity of activity. The field work was carried out from July 2004 to March 2005 by interviewers who were unaware of the study's objectives. A random sample of 10% of the interviews was repeated by a supervisor for quality control. Mothers gave written informed consent, and confidentiality was ensured.
Following descriptive analysis, we compared the prevalence of sedentary lifestyle across subgroups of the independent variables using χ2 tests for heterogeneity and linear trend. Because the variable of minutes per week of physical activity was noticeably skewed, we compared medians using the non-parametric K sample test on the equality of medians (Stata 8.0). We have reanalysed our dataset with other non-parametric tests for comparing distributions, but the results provided in table 2 table 4 were virtually unchanged. We carried out multivariable analyses using Poisson regression (Wald's test).20 This approach was used instead of logistic regression because, given the high prevalence of sedentary lifestyle, odds ratios overestimate prevalence ratios.20 We repeated the analyses using logistic regression and found virtually no change in the significance of the associations (data not shown).
Variables were included in Poisson regression in accordance with a conceptual framework defined a priori.21 This model incorporated all perinatal characteristics in the first hierarchical level of determination, variables collected at one year and four years in the second level, and variables collected in the behavioural substudy in the third level. We adjusted variables for other variables in the same and higher levels of determination that presented an association of P < 0.20 with the outcome. Owing to the different sampling fractions of low birthweight and normal birthweight children, we weighted analyses of second and third level variables.
In 1993, 5265 live births occurred in Pelotas, southern Brazil; 16 mothers refused to participate in a birth cohort study, resulting in a cohort of 5249 children. At follow-up in 2004-5, 4453 adolescents were interviewed. Taking into account 141 participants who had died, this corresponded to 87.5% of the cohort. table 1 presents selected baseline variables for adolescents located at age 10-12 years. No significant differences were observed for sex and birth weight. Low socioeconomic status, low maternal education, and high maternal body mass index were associated with higher follow-up rates, but at least 79.9% of children in each subgroup were traced.
The prevalence of a sedentary lifestyle at 10-12 years was 58.2% (95% confidence interval 56.7% to 59.7%). The median physical activity score was 235 minutes per week (mean 415 (SD 765) minutes per week), showing high skewness. All but 0.8% of the adolescents attended school, and these had an average of 2.2 physical education classes per week, each entailing about 30 minutes of low to moderate intensity. If physical education classes were included in the activity score, the prevalence of sedentary lifestyles would be reduced to 48.4% (46.9% to 49.9%).
Table 2 presents the crude prevalence of sedentary lifestyle and median physical activity levels (minutes per week) according to perinatal variables. Male sex, low family income, low maternal education, and high birth order were inversely associated with a sedentary lifestyle at 10-12 years. No associations were found for birth weight or prepregnancy body mass index.
Table 3 presents physical activity levels according to variables collected at the follow-up visits at one and four years. No significant associations were found with the variables indicating weight gain or overweight in childhood. Table 4 shows tracking of physical activity from age 4 to 10-12 years. Children classified by their mothers as average or above average (compared with below average) for physical activity at 4 years were more likely to be active at 10-12 years. No significant effect of sports performance at four years was observed.
The effects of sex, maternal education, and birth order did not change after adjustment (table 5). Although the confidence intervals for all categories of maternal education included unity, there was a logical ordering of the prevalence ratios, and the test for linear trend was significant. Family income was not included in the regression model owing to its high collinearity with maternal education, and because maternal education explained a higher proportion of the variance of physical activity. For birth order, the P value reflects a test for heterogeneity between the three categories, and the main difference is between categories 2 or 3 and ≥ 4; both of these have confidence intervals that include unity, but the overall effect of the variable is still significant. Indicators of weight gain and overweight collected at one and four years remained unrelated to sedentary lifestyles, even after adjustment for perinatal variables. Maternal classification of physical activity at 4 years was still associated with sedentary lifestyle at 10-12 years in the adjusted model.
Social and behavioural variables are more important than early biological characteristics in determining physical activity in adolescence. Interest in the early origins of chronic diseases is growing. Several variations of the early origins of disease hypothesis6 7 8 9 concur that diseases in adolescents and adults are partially programmed in early life. Most studies have focused on physiological outcomes, such as blood pressure, diabetes, and body composition.4 6 10 11 12 13 14 The hypothesis that behaviour might also be programmed during early critical windows has received less attention in the recent literature. Most studies on early determinants of physical activity have focused only on tracking of activity levels from infancy to childhood,22 23 24 25 26 and then on to adulthood.27 28 29 Identification of other possible early determinants is particularly important because a sedentary lifestyle is associated with overweight, a current global epidemic,30 31 32 and with several chronic diseases.1 In Pelotas, southern Brazil, for example, 49% of all people aged 20 years or more have a body mass index > 25, and about 40% fail to meet current recommendations for physical activity.33
We assessed the role of early life factors on physical activity at age 10-12 years within a prospective birth cohort study. Some methodological issues should be taken into account. Because the samples included in each follow-up visit were of different sizes, the power to detect differences was greater for perinatal variables than it was for exposures during childhood. The overall prevalence of the outcome was 58%. Assuming that among unexposed children this frequency would be 50%, we had 90% power for detecting a prevalence ratio of 1:12 in the whole sample, 1:23 in the follow-up visits at one and four years, and 1:33 in the behavioural substudy. Because we failed to find significant associations for some variables, even in the full dataset, and detected some significant associations in the smallest sample (behavioural substudy), lack of statistical power is unlikely to be responsible for our negative results for perinatal variables and data on variables collected at the one and four year visits.
The overall follow-up rate (87.5%) is high for studies in a low to middle income country where participants have to be actively sought.34 Although statistically significant, the differences in nonresponse rates according to socioeconomic indicators are unlikely to have affected the present results. The follow-up rates for prepregnancy body mass index ranged from 87% to 92% in the different categories; this is unlikely to have caused bias because this variable was not associated with the outcome in the adjusted analyses. The prospective nature of the information on early exposures rules out the possibility of recall bias.
Five variables were identified as being predictors of adolescent physical activity: sex, family income, maternal education, birth order, and reported physical activity at 4 years. The higher level of physical activity among boys concurs with the literature.35 36 The effect of socioeconomic level on physical activity varies according to the level of development of the population. In high income countries, where manual occupations and walking or cycling to work are less common, overall activity levels are higher among people of a higher socioeconomic group particularly due to leisure time activities.37 38 In previous studies among adults living in Pelotas, we showed that although upper social class is associated with leisure time physical activity,39 low social class is associated with non-leisure time physical activities (commuting, occupation, and housework), leading to an overall higher prevalence of sedentary lifestyles among wealthier people.33 In the present study, active transportation (walking or cycling) to and from school was much more common among poor adolescents, whereas the opposite was observed for leisure time activities (data not shown), also leading to an overall higher prevalence of sedentary lifestyles among wealthier people. This is in accordance with the results reported for adults.
To our knowledge the effect of birth order on physical activity has not been previously reported in adolescents. This finding persisted after statistical control for several socioeconomic variables but is difficult to interpret as we do not have information on number of siblings. Birth order has previously been associated with umbilical cord blood concentrations of hormones,40 which have in turn been linked to infant behaviour.41 Consistent with such evidence for a physiological mechanism linking birth order and activity level, several studies have reported a positive association between these variables in young children.42 43 In our study of adolescents, however, the association between physical activity and birth order was inverse. An alternative explanation, comprising a behavioural mechanism, is that birth order has acted as a proxy for number of siblings. The presence of siblings may provide greater opportunity for games and other physical activities. The theory of family aggregation in physical activity44 45 states that active families protect against sedentary lifestyles, but our results could suggest that a higher number of siblings, irrespective of their activity level, promotes active lifestyles in the long run. Brazil, as with many other middle income countries, is undergoing a noticeable drop in fertility levels46; smaller families may thus be contributing to lower levels of physical activity. Further studies are required to examine these competing hypotheses in more detail.
Tracking of physical activity from 4 to 10-12 years was significant, despite using a simple variable based on maternal report to determine activity level in childhood. Previous studies have tracked physical activity and fitness from childhood to adolescence, and most found moderate to high positive correlations.24 26 Such tracking may reflect genetic tendencies or the early establishment of habitual patterns of activity. Whether the promotion of active lifestyles early in childhood is justified, as has been proposed for adolescence to adulthood,29 47 48 requires further evidence from prospective studies.
Our negative findings are also of importance. Growth acceleration has been linked with subsequent obesity,13 diabetes,12 hypertension,10 11 and cardiovascular disease.9 Because physical inactivity is associated with these conditions,12 a possible pathway could involve lower levels of activity in children who grow rapidly and become overweight. Our data do not, however, support such a hypothesis, suggesting that the association between early growth and chronic diseases may involve other pathways.
In summary, we identified several childhood factors associated with physical activity in adolescence. Data from other birth cohort studies should be analysed to confirm or reject our findings. If our results are confirmed, this has benefits for public health. Intrauterine and early life deprivation may increase the risk of chronic disease but do not restrict physical activity; promotion of active lifestyles may at least in part compensate for the higher future risk faced by such children.
What is already known on this topic
Interest is currently widespread in the idea of programming of health status by factors operating in early life
Most studies have focused on physiological outcomes, such as blood pressure, diabetes, obesity, and body composition
Behaviours might also be programmed during early critical windows
What this study adds
Physical activity behaviour in adolescence is partially programmed by social and behavioural factors operating in early life
High birth order and level of physical activity at age 4 years were significant predictors of physical activity in adolescence
The pathway through which early growth acceleration increases the risk of chronic diseases in adulthood does not seem to be mediated by low activity levels
Contributors PCH had the original idea for these analyses, coordinated the 2004-5 fieldwork, carried out the literature review, and led the analysis and writing; he is guarantor. JCKW contributed in planning the research project and revising the manuscript. FFR contributed to the fieldwork, analysis, and writing. LA coordinated the behavioural substudy in 1997-8 and commented on the manuscript. CGV coordinated the Pelotas 1993 birth cohort study, revised the research protocol, and contributed to the analysis and writing.
Funding The Wellcome Trust initiative “major awards for Latin America on health consequences of population change.” Earlier phases of the 1993 cohort study were funded by the European Union, the National Program for Centers of Excellence (Brazil), the National Research Council (Brazil), and the Ministry of Health (Brazil).
Competing interests None declared.
Ethical approval Federal University of Pelotas Medical School ethics committee, affiliated with the Brazilian Federal Medical Council.