US flu mortality estimates are based on solid science
BMJ 2006; 332 doi: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.332.7534.177-a (Published 19 January 2006) Cite this as: BMJ 2006;332:177
- Lone Simonsen, senior epidemiologist (LSimonsen@niaid.nih.gov),
- Robert Taylor, contract analyst,
- Cecile Viboud, visiting fellow,
- Jonathan Dushoff, research scientist,
- Mark Miller, director, Division of Epidemiology and International Population Studies
- National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD 20892, USA
- National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD 20892, USA
Editor—Doshi implies that the use of statistical models to estimate flu related mortality is inappropriate.1 Not so. Epidemiologists rely on statistical models because the International Classification of Diseases (ICD) code for influenza (ICD9 487) severely undercounts the true number of flu related deaths. Doshi also implies that the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) deliberately exaggerates flu mortality for the benefit of the pharmaceutical industry, while other scientists stand by, meek and mute. The BMJ's decision to publish Doshi's commentary with no counterpoint from …
Log in
Log in using your username and password
Log in through your institution
Subscribe from £184 *
Subscribe and get access to all BMJ articles, and much more.
* For online subscription
Access this article for 1 day for:
£50 / $60/ €56 (excludes VAT)
You can download a PDF version for your personal record.