To abstain or not to abstain
BMJ 2005; 331 doi: https://doi.org/10.1136/sbmj.0512450 (Published 01 December 2005) Cite this as: BMJ 2005;331:0512450- Ozge Tuncalp, postdoctoral Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology1
- 1Yale School of Medicine
Background
The 2004 elections led George Bush to his second term as president of the United States. The Bush administration's inclinations toward abstinence-only sex education programmes have been well known since his first term. When the 2006 budget proposal was announced, reductions in health expenditure, including a wide range of public health programmes, were apparent. But one thing was striking: increased funding for sex education programmes promoting abstinence-only unless married. These programmes prohibit discussion of contraception except in the context of failure rates of specific contraceptive methods, such as condoms and oral contraceptive pills. Most American teenagers become sexually active by the age of 18. One may thus anticipate the damage that can be done …
Log in
Log in using your username and password
Log in through your institution
Subscribe from £184 *
Subscribe and get access to all BMJ articles, and much more.
* For online subscription
Access this article for 1 day for:
£50 / $60/ €56 (excludes VAT)
You can download a PDF version for your personal record.