Intended for healthcare professionals

  1. Research
  2. Improvements in...
  3. Improvements in quality of clinical care in English general practice 1998-2003: longitudinal observational study
Primary Care

Improvements in quality of clinical care in English general practice 1998-2003: longitudinal observational study

BMJ 2005; 331 doi: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.38632.611123.AE (Published 10 November 2005) Cite this as: BMJ 2005;331:1121
  1. Stephen M Campbell, research fellow (stephen.campbell{at}manchester.ac.uk)1,
  2. Martin O Roland, director1,
  3. Elizabeth Middleton, research associate1,
  4. David Reeves, research fellow1
  1. 1 National Primary Care Research and Development Centre, University of Manchester, Manchester M13 9PL
  1. Correspondence to S M Campbell
  • Accepted 27 September 2005

Abstract

Objective To measure changes in quality of care for three major chronic diseases (coronary heart disease, asthma, and type 2 diabetes) between 1998 and 2003.

Design Longitudinal cohort study.

Setting 42 general practices in six geographical areas of England (Avon, Bury/Rochdale, Enfield, Oldham, Somerset, South Essex).

Participants Medical record data for 2300 patients with diabetes, asthma, or coronary heart disease in 1998, and 1495 patients in 2003.

Main outcome measure Quality of care assessed against predefined evidence based review criteria.

Results Between 1998 and 2003, quality of care improved markedly in terms of maximum possible scores on the review criteria, from 60.5% to 78.1% for coronary heart disease (change = 17.6, 95% confidence interval 13.9 to 21.4; P < 0.001), 60.1% to 70.3% for asthma (10.2, 4.6 to 15.8; P = 0.001), and 70.4% to 77.7% for diabetes (7.3, 3.5 to 11.1; P = 0.001). Important changes occurred to several indicators potentially related to improved health outcomes. These included improved control of serum cholesterol (to ≤ 5 mmol/l) from 17.6% to 61.4% in coronary heart disease and from 21.5% to 52% in diabetes and control of blood pressure to ≤150/90 in coronary heart disease from 47.3% to 72.2% and to ≤145/85 in diabetes from 21.8% to 35.8%. A small, non-significant improvement in glycaemic control occurred among diabetic patients (37.9% to 39.7% with HbA1c < 7.4%). Significant improvements also occurred in the recording of exercise capacity and diet and weight advice for patients with coronary heart disease; of smoking advice, peak flow, and symptoms for patients with asthma; and of creatinine, weight, and HbA1c for patients with diabetes. Over the five years, more improvement in coronary heart disease care occurred in large practices and practices in affluent areas.

Conclusions Substantial improvements were seen in quality of care for the three conditions studied between 1998 and 2003, a time of systematic quality improvement initiatives in the NHS. The changes were most marked for coronary heart disease. English general practices could be expected to achieve high clinical quality scores in the initial year of a new contact, which provides financial incentives for high quality care from 2004.

Footnotes

  • Embedded Imagewebplus.f1An extra table is on bmj.com

  • Contributions SMC, MOR, and DR were involved in the design of the study, data analysis, and writing the paper. EM was involved in analysing the data and writing the paper. SMC was principal investigator in both time periods and is the guarantor.

  • Funding This work was done by the National Primary Care Research and Development Centre, which receives funding from the Department of Health. The views expressed in this publication are those of the authors and not those of the Department of Health.

  • Competing interests None declared.

  • Ethical approval Ethical approval was granted by Manchester multicentre research ethics committee and by the six local ethics committees.

  • Accepted 27 September 2005
View Full Text
Back to top