Attempts to prevent postnatal depression

BMJ 2005; 331 doi: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.331.7507.5 (Published 30 June 2005) Cite this as: BMJ 2005;331:5
  1. Judith Lumley (J.Lumley@latrobe.edu.au), director, mother and child health research unit
  1. La Trobe University, Carlton, VIC 3053, Australia

    Interventions have not included mental health workers, and have failed

    A systematic review published in this week's BMJ concludes that the many psychosocial or psychological interventions tested so far in trials do not effectively prevent postnatal depression.1 Because this is an important disorder arising from around one in eight births, the authors call for more research on intensive support at home in the postnatal period.1 As little as 20 years ago, however, there was debate about whether postnatal depression was an important problem at all. It was too often dismissed as only a minor, transient problem with coping. So what happened in the meantime to warrant these trials of possible prevention?

    In 1989 the prevalence of depression among women eight months after birth in population based surveys in Victoria, Australia, was 15.4% (95% confidence interval 12.8% to 18.0%)2 and two subsequent studies found very similar prevalences and confidence intervals.3 4w1 Depression was defined in these studies as a score of3 13 on the Edinburgh postnatal depression scale: a score of 10-12 out of a possible total score of 30 is sometimes used …

    View Full Text

    Log in

    Log in through your institution


    * For online subscription