Letters Academic medicine: who is it for? BMJ 2005; 330 doi: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.330.7487.360-b (Published 10 February 2005) Cite this as: BMJ 2005;330:360 Article Related content Metrics Responses Peer review Related articles Editorial Who cares about academic medicine? Published: 30 September 2004; BMJ 329 doi:10.1136/bmj.329.7469.751 Editorial Academic medicine: a faltering engine Published: 23 February 2002; BMJ 324 doi:10.1136/bmj.324.7335.437 See more Chemoprevention of colorectal cancer in individuals with previous colorectal neoplasia: systematic review and network meta-analysis BMJ December 05, 2016, 355 i6188; DOI: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.i6188 Alpha blockers for treatment of ureteric stones: systematic review and meta-analysis BMJ December 01, 2016, 355 i6112; DOI: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.i6112 Sex based subgroup differences in randomized controlled trials: empirical evidence from Cochrane meta-analyses BMJ November 24, 2016, 355 i5826; DOI: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.i5826 Association between prediabetes and risk of cardiovascular disease and all cause mortality: systematic review and meta-analysis BMJ November 23, 2016, 355 i5953; DOI: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.i5953 Effects of ischaemic conditioning on major clinical outcomes in people undergoing invasive procedures: systematic review and meta-analysis BMJ November 07, 2016, 355 i5599; DOI: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.i5599 Cited by... Four pillars of academic medicine need to be restoredFulltext