Letters
Users' guide to detecting misleading claims in research: Authors' reply
BMJ 2005; 330 doi: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.330.7483.146 (Published 13 January 2005) Cite this as: BMJ 2005;330:146
- Victor M Montori, assistant professor,
- Roman Jaeschke, clinical professor of medicine (montori.victor@mayo.edu),
- Holger J Schünemann, associate professor of medicine
- McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada Department of Medicine
- Mayo Clinic College of Medicine, Rochester, MN 55905, USA
- Department of Clinical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, McMaster University
EDITOR—The tone and scope of the rapid responses to our users' guides confirm the central assumption of our guides: that there are emotional and economic interests that affect the objectivity of science. We think that these guides will help readers form their own opinions about the evidence.
Penston pointed out an inconsistency …
Log in
Log in using your username and password
Log in through your institution
Subscribe from £173 *
Subscribe and get access to all BMJ articles, and much more.
* For online subscription
Access this article for 1 day for:
£38 / $45 / €42 (excludes VAT)
You can download a PDF version for your personal record.