Users' guide to detecting misleading claims in research: Discussion section helps redress the balance

BMJ 2005; 330 doi: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.330.7483.145-a (Published 13 January 2005) Cite this as: BMJ 2005;330:145
  1. S Anuradha, master of public health student (sanuradha@ntlworld.com)
  1. Heath Park, Cardiff CF14 4XN

    EDITOR—Montori et al produce a users' guide to detecting misleading claims in reports of clinical research.1 In the previous letter Penston raises objections to the proposal to read only the methods and results section and to …

    View Full Text

    Log in

    Log in through your institution


    * For online subscription