Community pulmonary rehabilitation after hospitalisation for acute exacerbations of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: randomised controlled study
BMJ 2004; 329 doi: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.38258.662720.3A (Published 18 November 2004) Cite this as: BMJ 2004;329:1209
Data supplement
Posted as supplied by author
CONSORT Checklist of items to include when reporting a randomized trial
PAPER SECTION
And topicItem
Description
Reported on
Page #
TITLE & ABSTRACT
1
How participants were allocated to interventions (e.g., "random allocation", "randomized", or "randomly assigned").
2
INTRODUCTION
Background2
Scientific background and explanation of rationale.
4, 5
METHODS
Participants3
Eligibility criteria for participants and the settings and locations where the data were collected.
6
Interventions
4
Precise details of the interventions intended for each group and how and when they were actually administered.
6,7, 8
Objectives
5
Specific objectives and hypotheses.
4, 5
Outcomes
6
Clearly defined primary and secondary outcome measures and, when applicable, any methods used to enhance the quality of measurements (e.g., multiple observations, training of assessors).
8
Sample size
7
How sample size was determined and, when applicable, explanation of any interim analyses and stopping rules.
9
Randomization --
Sequence generation8
Method used to implement the random allocation sequence (e.g., numbered containers or central telephone), clarifying whether the sequence was concealed until interventions were assigned
7
Randomization --
Allocation concealment9
Method used to implement the random allocation sequence (e.g., numbered containers or central telephone), clarifying whether the sequence was concealed until interventions were assigned.
7
Randomization --
Implementation10
Who generated the allocation sequence, who enrolled participants, and who assigned participants to their groups.
7
Blinding (masking)
11
Whether or not participants, those administering the interventions, and those assessing the outcomes were blinded to group assignment. When relevant, how the success of blinding was evaluated.
8
Statistical methods
12
Statistical methods used to compare groups for primary outcome(s); Methods for additional analyses, such as subgroup analyses and adjusted analyses.
9
RESULTS
Participant flow
13
Flow of participants through each stage (a diagram is strongly recommended). Specifically, for each group report the numbers of participants randomly assigned, receiving intended treatment, completing the study protocol, and analyzed for the primary outcome. Describe protocol deviations from study as planned, together with reasons.
Fig 1
10
Recruitment
14
Dates defining the periods of recruitment and follow-up.
10
Baseline data
15
Baseline demographic and clinical characteristics of each group.
Table 1
Numbers analyzed
16
Number of participants (denominator) in each group included in each analysis and whether the analysis was by "intention-to-treat". State the results in absolute numbers when feasible (e.g., 10/20, not 50%).
Table 2
9
Outcomes and estimation
17
For each primary and secondary outcome, a summary of results for each group, and the estimated effect size and its precision (e.g., 95% confidence interval).
Table 2
Ancillary analyses
18
Address multiplicity by reporting any other analyses performed, including subgroup analyses and adjusted analyses, indicating those pre-specified and those exploratory.
8
Adverse events
19
All important adverse events or side effects in each intervention group.
10
DISCUSSION
Interpretation20
Interpretation of the results, taking into account study hypotheses, sources of potential bias or imprecision and the dangers associated with multiplicity of analyses and outcomes.
11, 12
Generalizability
21
Generalizability (external validity) of the trial findings.
13
Overall evidence
22
General interpretation of the results in the context of current evidence.
14, 15
.
Posted as supplied by author
CONSORT Checklist of items to include when reporting a randomized trial
PAPER SECTION
And topicItem
Description
Reported on
Page #
TITLE & ABSTRACT
1
How participants were allocated to interventions (e.g., "random allocation", "randomized", or "randomly assigned").
2
INTRODUCTION
Background2
Scientific background and explanation of rationale.
4, 5
METHODS
Participants3
Eligibility criteria for participants and the settings and locations where the data were collected.
6
Interventions
4
Precise details of the interventions intended for each group and how and when they were actually administered.
6,7, 8
Objectives
5
Specific objectives and hypotheses.
4, 5
Outcomes
6
Clearly defined primary and secondary outcome measures and, when applicable, any methods used to enhance the quality of measurements (e.g., multiple observations, training of assessors).
8
Sample size
7
How sample size was determined and, when applicable, explanation of any interim analyses and stopping rules.
9
Randomization --
Sequence generation8
Method used to implement the random allocation sequence (e.g., numbered containers or central telephone), clarifying whether the sequence was concealed until interventions were assigned
7
Randomization --
Allocation concealment9
Method used to implement the random allocation sequence (e.g., numbered containers or central telephone), clarifying whether the sequence was concealed until interventions were assigned.
7
Randomization --
Implementation10
Who generated the allocation sequence, who enrolled participants, and who assigned participants to their groups.
7
Blinding (masking)
11
Whether or not participants, those administering the interventions, and those assessing the outcomes were blinded to group assignment. When relevant, how the success of blinding was evaluated.
8
Statistical methods
12
Statistical methods used to compare groups for primary outcome(s); Methods for additional analyses, such as subgroup analyses and adjusted analyses.
9
RESULTS
Participant flow
13
Flow of participants through each stage (a diagram is strongly recommended). Specifically, for each group report the numbers of participants randomly assigned, receiving intended treatment, completing the study protocol, and analyzed for the primary outcome. Describe protocol deviations from study as planned, together with reasons.
Fig 1
10
Recruitment
14
Dates defining the periods of recruitment and follow-up.
10
Baseline data
15
Baseline demographic and clinical characteristics of each group.
Table 1
Numbers analyzed
16
Number of participants (denominator) in each group included in each analysis and whether the analysis was by "intention-to-treat". State the results in absolute numbers when feasible (e.g., 10/20, not 50%).
Table 2
9
Outcomes and estimation
17
For each primary and secondary outcome, a summary of results for each group, and the estimated effect size and its precision (e.g., 95% confidence interval).
Table 2
Ancillary analyses
18
Address multiplicity by reporting any other analyses performed, including subgroup analyses and adjusted analyses, indicating those pre-specified and those exploratory.
8
Adverse events
19
All important adverse events or side effects in each intervention group.
10
DISCUSSION
Interpretation20
Interpretation of the results, taking into account study hypotheses, sources of potential bias or imprecision and the dangers associated with multiplicity of analyses and outcomes.
11, 12
Generalizability
21
Generalizability (external validity) of the trial findings.
13
Overall evidence
22
General interpretation of the results in the context of current evidence.
14, 15
.
Related articles
- This Week In The BMJ Published: 18 November 2004; BMJ 329 doi:10.1136/bmj.329.7476.0
- Letter Published: 24 February 2005; BMJ 330 doi:10.1136/bmj.330.7489.480-a
- Research Published: 08 July 2014; BMJ 349 doi:10.1136/bmj.g4315
- Editorial Published: 08 July 2014; BMJ 349 doi:10.1136/bmj.g4370
- Practice Published: 08 June 2006; BMJ 332 doi:10.1136/bmj.332.7554.1379
See more
- Chemoprevention of colorectal cancer in individuals with previous colorectal neoplasia: systematic review and network meta-analysisBMJ December 05, 2016, 355 i6188; DOI: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.i6188
- NHS to fund large trial of pre-exposure prophylaxis for HIV preventionBMJ December 05, 2016, 355 i6537; DOI: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.i6537
- Bill to boost medical research funding and speed drug approval passes US houseBMJ December 01, 2016, 355 i6498; DOI: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.i6498
- Alpha blockers for treatment of ureteric stones: systematic review and meta-analysisBMJ December 01, 2016, 355 i6112; DOI: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.i6112
- Sixty seconds on . . . solanezumabBMJ November 29, 2016, 355 i6389; DOI: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.i6389
Cited by...
- Extrathoracic muscle wasting in exacerbations of COPD: no longer outside the region of interest
- Findings of a feasibility study of pre-operative pulmonary rehabilitation to reduce post-operative pulmonary complications in people with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease scheduled for major abdominal surgery
- Early pulmonary rehabilitation after acute exacerbation of COPD: a randomised controlled trial
- Management of COPD exacerbations: a European Respiratory Society/American Thoracic Society guideline
- Outcomes from hospitalised acute exacerbations of COPD: a bundle of optimism?
- Mortality-Reducing Effect of Rehabilitation for COPD: Observational Propensity-Matched Cohort Study Using a Nationwide Database
- Treating and preventing acute exacerbations of COPD
- Use of exercise testing in the evaluation of interventional efficacy: an official ERS statement
- Gait speed and readmission following hospitalisation for acute exacerbations of COPD: a prospective study
- Rehabilitation after an exacerbation of chronic respiratory disease
- An early rehabilitation intervention to enhance recovery during hospital admission for an exacerbation of chronic respiratory disease: randomised controlled trial
- A UK survey of rehabilitation following critical illness: implementation of NICE Clinical Guidance 83 (CG83) following hospital discharge
- Pulmonary rehabilitation
- Pulmonary rehabilitation following hospitalisation for acute exacerbation of COPD: referrals, uptake and adherence
- Pulmonary rehabilitation; what's in a name?
- British Thoracic Society guideline on pulmonary rehabilitation in adults: accredited by NICE
- Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: consequences beyond the lung
- Attacking the disease spiral in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: an update
- Skeletal muscle effects of electrostimulation after COPD exacerbation: a pilot study
- Outcomes following non-invasive ventilation for hypercapnic exacerbations of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease
- Rehabilitation and acute exacerbations
- Follow-up and nonpharmacological management of the idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis patient
- Are evaluated respiratory service developments implemented into clinical practice?
- Outpatient pulmonary rehabilitation following acute exacerbations of COPD
- Does physical inactivity cause chronic obstructive pulmonary disease?
- Short- and long-term efficacy of a community-based COPD management programme in less advanced COPD: a randomised controlled trial
- Is INTERdisciplinary COMmunity-based COPD management (INTERCOM) cost-effective?
- Exercise and muscle dysfunction in COPD: implications for pulmonary rehabilitation
- Guidelines for the physiotherapy management of the adult, medical, spontaneously breathing patient
- Interventions to reduce the frequency of exacerbations of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease
- Chicken or egg: physical activity in COPD revisited
- Outcomes for COPD pharmacological trials: from lung function to biomarkers
- Intermediate care--Hospital-at-Home in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: British Thoracic Society guideline
- Quadriceps strength predicts mortality in patients with moderate to severe chronic obstructive pulmonary disease
- Sarcopaenia in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease
- Poster presentations
- Caring for the burden of COPD.
- Non-pharmacological management
- COPD exacerbations {middle dot} 5: Management.
- Abdominal muscle and quadriceps strength in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease
- Is this the beginning of unravelling the puzzle of COPD exacerbations?
- Other articles noted
- Evidence based journal watch
- Benefits of early pulmonary rehabilitation following acute exacerbation of COPD
- Pulmonary rehabilitation and readmissions in COPD: Hospital readmissions did not fall
- Pulmonary Rehabilitation in Acute Exacerbations of COPD