Intended for healthcare professionals

Letters

Ethics: entitlement may benefit disadvantaged patients and students alike

BMJ 2004; 329 doi: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.329.7469.800-a (Published 30 September 2004) Cite this as: BMJ 2004;329:800
  1. Malcolm McCoubrie, senior lecturer in disability (mccoubri{at}sghms.ac.uk)
  1. St George's Hospital Medical School, London SW17 0RE

    EDITOR—Jagsi and Lehmann extrapolate three major areas of research ethics to medical education but could have added entitlement, using the ideas of Rawls, to benefit disadvantaged people.1 2

    All fourth year medical students at this medical school see a patient with intellectual disability, and they not infrequently question the validity of that patient's consent to be interviewed. A person with mild or moderate intellectual impairment can usually give informed consent to student contact, but this does take extra time and effort. People with severe intellectual disability usually cannot.

    We therefore notify in advance the patient's carers, community team, and general practitioner of the proposed student's visit, any of whom can prevent the visit if they consider it may be harmful. We also point out that we offer to the patient with intellectual disability an extra benefit in the form of a supervised, student led, physical health check that he or she otherwise might not have had, and a biopsychosocial assessment that is often unblinkered and innovative. Such benefits to potentially disadvantaged people may well be happening in other areas of medical education but may not have been recorded.

    Footnotes

    • Competing interests None declared.

    References

    1. 1.
    2. 2.
    View Abstract