Low back pain: Sacroiliac joint pain may be myth
BMJ 2004; 329 doi: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.329.7459.232 (Published 22 July 2004) Cite this as: BMJ 2004;329:232
All rapid responses
Rapid responses are electronic comments to the editor. They enable our users to debate issues raised in articles published on bmj.com. A rapid response is first posted online. If you need the URL (web address) of an individual response, simply click on the response headline and copy the URL from the browser window. A proportion of responses will, after editing, be published online and in the print journal as letters, which are indexed in PubMed. Rapid responses are not indexed in PubMed and they are not journal articles. The BMJ reserves the right to remove responses which are being wilfully misrepresented as published articles or when it is brought to our attention that a response spreads misinformation.
From March 2022, the word limit for rapid responses will be 600 words not including references and author details. We will no longer post responses that exceed this limit.
The word limit for letters selected from posted responses remains 300 words.
I read with interest the review article by by Speed on Low back pain
and the subsequent response from Bamji 1. I find Bamji’s statement not
supported by evidence. His assertion is based on some observations-none of
them supported by reference.
Injections into the sacroiliac joint (SIJ) under fluoroscopic control
have proved that the joint is a source of low back pain 2. SIJ is an
important link in weight transmission to the lower limb. The SIJ surface
is oriented parallel to the line of weight transmission. So, weight
bearing results in significant amount of shear stress. The SIJ may be a
very rigid joint, but there is movement on physiological loading,
increased under larger loading, in both symptomatic and asymptomatic
joints 3.
Sacroiliac pain have so far been attributed to joint hypermobility.
It appears increasingly clear that we should think in terms of joint
dysfunction due to instability from abnormal motor unit recruitment. There
is growing evidence that patients presenting with low back pain of
“sacroiliac origin” have altered pattern of motor unit recruitment4. The
causative relationship is still unclear.
Exercise related stress reaction of SIJ is a known cause of low back
pain 5. I find no evidence to support his observation that most cases of
sacroiliac strain are injuries of the gluteal region.
Our understanding of the role of SIJ in low back pain is still
evolving. There are many aspects where we need more research until we have
definitive knowledge. Contributing unsubstantiated statements may help to
increase the myth rather than dispel it.
References
1. Bamji AN. Sacroiliac joint pain may be myth. BMJ 2004;329:232.
2. Maigne J, Aivaliklis A, Pfefer F. Results of sacroiliac joint
double block and value of sacroiliac pain provocation tests in 54 patients
with low back pain. Spine 1996;21:1889-92.
3. Struesson B, Selvik G, Uden ALF. Movements of the sacroiliac
joints: a roentgen stereophotogrammetric analysis.Spine.1989;14(2):162-5.
4. Hungerford B, Gilleard W, Hodges P. Evidence of altered
lumbopelvic muscle recruitment in the presence of sacroiliac joint pain.
Spine. 2003;28(14): 1593-1600.
5. Marymont JV, Lynch MA, Henning CE. Exercise related stress
reaction of the sacroiliac joint. An unusual cause of low back pain in
athletes. American Journal of Sports Medicine. 1986;14(4):320-3.
Competing interests:
None declared
Competing interests: No competing interests
Bamji suggests that in the absence of inflammatory joint disease or
infection, the sacroiliac joint is an unlikely source of low back pain but
this assumption ignores a decade of scientific evidence 1. Well designed
studies using intra-articular sacroiliac joint block injections with local
anaesthetic (with exact placement confirmed with radiographic contrast)
followed by repeat confirmatory blocks to exclude placebo responses, have
estimated that in between 13 and 19% of chronic low back pain, the source
of the pain could be traced to the sacroiliac joint 2,3. Injectate may
escape from the joint in a significant proportion of cases but the volumes
injected are so small (2.5mls or less) that it is hardly likely that any
pain relief during the local anaesthetic phase is from buttock muscle
anaesthesia 4.
Bamji suggests that joint rigidity makes it an unlikely pain source
but movement of the sacroiliac joints in normal volunteers and the
asymmetry of movement between paired sacroiliac joints in patients with
pelvic pain have been observed 5-7.
Although there is no proven treatment for sacroiliac joint pain; if
you dismiss it as a clinical entity, then you will never find it and
research into specific treatments will flounder.
1. Bamji AN. Low Back Pain: Sacroiliac joint pain may be a myth. BMJ
2004;329:232.(24 July)
2. Schwarzer AC, Aprill CN, Bogduk N. The sacroiliac joint in chronic
low back pain. Spine 1995;20(1):31-7.
3. Maigne JY, Aivaliklis A, Pfefer F. Results of sacroiliac joint
double block and value of sacroiliac pain provocation tests in 54 patients
with low back pain. Spine 1996;21(16):1889-92.
4. Fortin JD, Washington WJ, Falco JE. Three pathways between the
sacroiliac joint and neural structures. Am J Neuroradiol 199;20:1429-1434.
5. Sturesson B, Selvik G, Uden A. Movements of the sacroiliac joints.
A roentgen stereophotogrammetric analysis. Spine 1989;14(2):162-5.
6. Buyruk HM, Snijders CJ, Vleeming A et al. The measurement of sacro
-iliac stiffness with colour Doppler imaging: a study on healthy subjects.
European J of Radiology 1995;21:117-121.
7. Buyruk HM, Stam HJ, Snijders CJ et al. Measurement of sacroiliac
stiffness in peripartum pelvic pain patients with Doppler imaging of
vibrations (DIV). European J Obstetric And Gynaecological Reproductive
Biology 1999;83:159-63.
Competing interests:
None declared
Competing interests: No competing interests
"....joint is so rigid that mechanical disruption is almost
impossible.The pelvis will fracture first." These words by Dr. Bamji and
his explanation why injections into the SI joint sometimes work make
interesting, if disturbing reading.
Dr. B. states that injection works because the injected material goes into
the muscle (here gluteals) and he mentions a colleague who, many years
ago, injected ink into corpses and subsequently found all the ink in the
muscle tissue.
I assume that no pain relief was experienced by the subjects.
About 75 years ago, a Swiss chiropractor conducted very similar
experiments but came to quite different conclusions.
He was, of course Dr. Fred Illi and you could not have convinced him nor
many thousands of chiropractors that Dr. Bamji's assessment is correct.
It is said that cranial bones are practically immoveable yet there
are techniques both in Osteopathy and Chiropractic to accomplish near
miracles through cranial manipulation.
The sacroiliac joint can undergo 'fixation' and various forms of
misalignment -commonly known as 'subluxation'- and these conditions can
cause considerable symptoms.
They are successfully treated every day in all parts of the world by the
skilful application of manipulation.
While many so-called sacroiliac strains or subluxations are probably
lumbar disc problems in real life, and many sacroiliac complaints are
mechanical fixations (jamming)due to various pathologies,the gluteal
muscle is not a major player.
The gluteals do not mechanically 'lock' the sacroiliac joint with
resultant symptoms nor does any other muscle accomplish this. This is for
the simple reason that Nature has not provided a muscle to actually lock
the SI joint, and for very good reasons.
I have observed a lay bonesetter get instant pain relief from severe
'sacroiliac pain' by forcefully tugging on the leg.
Competing interests:
None declared
Competing interests: No competing interests
Evidence pertaining to the clinical significance of the sacroiliac joints
To the editor:
I offer the following information to better inform the discussion
that has arisen out of Bamji's non-evidence based suggestion that, in the
absence of inflammatory joint disease or infection, the sacroiliac joint
(SIJ) is an unlikely source of low back pain.
The possibility that the SIJ was a potential source of low back pain
was discussed as early as 1905 (1). More recently the prevalence of SIJ
syndrome in persons with back pain has become a topic of interest. The
prevelance has been reported to vary widely (2,3). For example Schwarzer
et al. found that the prevalence of SIJ pain appears to be at least 13%
and perhaps as high a 30% in patients with low back and buttock pain (2).
Bernard and Kirkaldy-Willis reported the prevalence to be 22.5% in 1293
patients with back pain (3).
Recent histological studies suggest that the SIJ should be classified
anatomically as a symphysis with some characteristics of a synovial joint
being confined to the distal cartilaginous portion at the iliac side. (4)
Animal model studies suggest that the SIJ is a pain- and proprio-sensitive
structure richly innervated by sensory neurons in dorsal root ganglions
ipsilateral to the joint from L1 to S2 (5). The presence of nerve fibers
and mechanoreceptors in the SIJ capsule and ligaments demonstrate that the
central nervous system receives proprioceptive and pain information from
the SIJ (6).
One of the major functions of the SIJ appears to be to dissipate
loads of the torso to the lower extremity and vice versa. During recent
years a number of studies have shown that despite the stability of the
joint (not just a product of the ridges present in the joint, but also due
to the presence of many generously sized ligaments) small degrees of
movement, mostly rotation and translation, do occur within the SIJ (7-9).
Variablility in patterns of pain referral from the SIJ have been
documented. It has been proposed that the variablility in patterns of pain
referral from the SIJ may arise for several reasons, including the joint's
complex innervation, sclerotomal pain referral, irritation of adjacent
structures, and varying locations of injury with the SIJ. A statistically
significant relationship has been identified between pain location and
age, with younger patients more likely to describe pain distal to the
knee. Pain referral from the SIJ does not appear to be limited to the
lumbar region and buttock (10).
References:
1.) Goldwaith JH, Osgood RB: A consideration of the pelvic
articulations from an anatomical pathological and clinical standpoint.
Boston Med Surg J 1905; 152:593-601.
2.) Schwarzer AC, Aprill CN, Bogduk N: The sacroiliac joint in
chronic low back pain. Spine 1995;20:31-7.
3.) Bernard TN, Kirkaldy-Willis WH: Recognizing specific
characteristics of nonspecific low back pain. Clin Orthop 1987;(217):266-
80.
4.) Puhakka KB, Melsen F, Jurik AG, Boel LW, Vesterby A, Egund N. MR
imaging of the normal sacroiliac joint with correlation to histology.
Skeletal Radiol. 2004;33:15-28.
5.) Murata Y, Takahashi K, Yamagata M, Takahashi Y, Shimada Y, Moriya
H. Sensory innervation of the sacroiliac joint in rats. Spine.
2000;25:2015-9.
6.) Vilensky JA, O'Connor BL, Fortin JD, Merkel GJ, Jimenez AM;
Scofield BA, Kleiner JB. Histologic analysis of neural elements in the
human sacroiliac joint. Spine. 2002;27:1202-7.
7.) Jacob HA, Kissling RO. The mobility of the sacroiliac joints in
healthy volunteers between 20 and 50 years of age. Clin Biomech.
1995;10:352-361.
8.) Kissling RO, Jacob HA. The mobility of the sacroiliac joint in
healthy subjects. Bull Hosp Jt Dis. 1996;54:158-64.
9.) Wang M, Dumas GA. Mechanical behavior of the female sacroiliac
joint and influence of the anterior and posterior sacroiliac ligaments
under sagittal loads. Clin Biomech. 1998;13:293-299.
10.) Slipman CW, Jackson HB, Lipetz JS, Chan KT, Lenrow D, Vresilovic
EJ. Sacroiliac joint pain referral zones. Arch Phys Med Rehabil.
2000;81:334-8.
Competing interests:
None declared
Competing interests: No competing interests