Perinatal mortality in rural China: retrospective cohort studyBMJ 2003; 327 doi: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.327.7427.1319 (Published 04 December 2003) Cite this as: BMJ 2003;327:1319
- Zhuochun Wu, associate professor ()1,
- Kirsi Viisainen, senior researcher2,
- Ying Wang, research assistant1,
- Elina Hemminki, research professor2
- 1School of Public Health, Fudan University, 138 Yi Xue Yuan Road, Shanghai 200032, China
- 2 National Research and Development Centre for Welfare and Health, PO Box 220, 00531 Helsinki, Finland
- Correspondence to: Z Wu
- Accepted 30 September 2003
Objectives To explore the use of local civil registration data to assess the perinatal mortality in a typical rural county in a less developed province in China, 1999-2000.
Design Retrospective cohort study. Pregnancies in a cohort of women followed from registration of pregnancy to outcome of infant seven days after birth.
Setting Routine family planning records in 20 rural townships in eastern China.
Subjects 3697 pregnancies registered by the local family planning system during 1999.
Main outcome measures Abortions, stillbirths, early neonatal mortality, perinatal mortality.
Results Only three cases were lost to follow up. The average age of the women at pregnancy was 25.9 years. Three hundred and twelve pregnancies were aborted and 240 ended in miscarriage (total 552, 15%). The perinatal mortality rate was 69 per 1000 births, the rate of stillbirth was 24 per 1000 births, and the early neonatal mortality was 46 per 1000 live births. The early neonatal mortality was 29 in boys and 69 in girls per 1000 live births. The perinatal mortality rate increased notably with parity and was higher in townships having lower income per capita.
Conclusions The family planning system at the most local level is a useful data source for studying perinatal mortality in rural China. The perinatal mortality rate in the study county was higher than previously reported for both rural and urban areas in China. The results by parity and sex of the infant raise concern over the impact of the one child policy.
In China the reported estimates of the perinatal mortality rate in the 1980s-1990s have shown quite a large variation: from 10 to 19 per 1000 in well developed urban areas1 2 and from 20 to 30 per 1000 in moderately developed urban areas.3 4 Reliable data from rural areas have not been available in the international literature, while in Chinese studies the rates have varied from 18 to 49 per 1000.5–7 These studies, however, were based on cross sectional household interviews. Since the mid-1990s there have been no reported studies of the perinatal mortality rate in rural China.
We used routine data locally collected by the family planning system to describe the perinatal mortality in a typical rural area in a less developed province in China.
Reproductive health care in China has been strongly influenced by its one child population policy. Contraception services are controlled by family planning authorities who officially authorise all pregnancies, while care for pregnancies and births is provided mainly within the public healthcare system. The details of the population policy and its implementation have varied over time and between provinces. Financial and other incentives have been used to encourage people to follow the policy regulations, and discouragement of larger families has included financial levies on each additional child and other sanctions.8 Since the mid-1980s, many provinces have implemented a more flexible policy: rural families with one daughter and no sons were allowed to have a second child.
We studied a county in a rural area in eastern China, in which most of the population of nearly 900 000 is engaged in farming. The county covers almost 3000 square kilometres, mostly of flatland. In terms of national gross domestic product rankings it is typical of less developed rural areas in China.
The healthcare system consisted of county hospitals and decentralised healthcare services at the township and village level. Specialised obstetric services were available only at county level; in township hospitals midwives cared for normal births, but there were usually no systematic prenatal care services. Private clinics in villages were officially not involved in pregnancy or birth care. All three levels of health care functioned on a fee for service basis, and most farmers paid for all health services themselves.
The local family planning system was also organised at three levels. The county level authorities supervised the national policy, but its implementation took place mainly at township and village level. In townships, medically trained staff provided services at family planning stations, including organising and performing systematic pregnancy testing, abortions, and insertions of intrauterine devices. In each village there was one female family planning worker who provided contraceptives, assisted in pregnancy testing, and reported population events (including miscarriages, abortions, stillbirths, live births, and neonatal deaths) to township authorities.
In the family planning system, married women aged 20 to 49 years were required to undergo a pregnancy test every two or three months. In the case of a pregnancy unauthorised by family planning regulations or marriage law, the woman would be persuaded to have an abortion. Otherwise she and her partner would be fined about £300-700 ($500-1200, €;430-1000). In addition to the fine, state employees could lose their jobs or be demoted.
We carried out a retrospective cohort study of pregnancies that occurred between 1 January and 31 December 1999 (n = 3697) in 20 selected townships. The data used were collected as pre-intervention baseline data for a controlled trial on the introduction of systematic prenatal care in rural China. Data were collected from 20 of 55 eligible towns. Two sets of data were used: pregnancy outcome data and township socioeconomic data.
Definitions used in study
Maternal age: age when pregnancy was registered
Parity: number of live children at time of pregnancy
Gestational age: calculated from registered date of last menstrual period (weeks)
Stillbirth: fetal death between 28 weeks' gestation and delivery, calculated per 1000 births
Early neonatal mortality: death in first seven days after birth, calculated per 1000 live births
Perinatal mortality rate: stillbirths and deaths in first seven days, per 1000 births
A trained local field research assistant abstracted the data on pregnancies and their outcomes from the original handwritten work records of the village family planning workers. The records included data on all women who had a positive pregnancy test result and on the outcome of pregnancy so that each outcome could easily be linked to the respective woman. The data collection occurred at township level where the records of each village were brought each month for the compilation of statistics. The subsequent outcomes of the pregnancies in the 1999 cohort were followed up in family planning records in 1999 or 2000. The variables related to the women's backgrounds were each woman's birth date, township of residence, and number of living children. Variables related to pregnancy were the date of the last menstrual period and miscarriage or abortion. The infant variables were sex, singleton or multiple birth, birth order, live birth, stillbirth, and early neonatal death.
The socioeconomic data were collected from the county statistical bureau. The bureau estimates the average annual net income of farmers by interviewing a random sample of 30 households from each township. The farmers' net income is the average annual income minus tax and the cost invested in production; this figure was used as the socioeconomic variable for each township. The selected townships were representative of the study county in terms of socioeconomic background: the farmers' net annual income per capita in the 20 study townships was $270 and in the whole county it was about $260.
The box shows the definitions we used in the study. We calculated relative risks and their confidence intervals for comparison between parity, infant sex, and township groups.
There were 3697 pregnancies in the cohort, resulting in 3092 live births in a total population of 299 463. The average age at pregnancy was 25.9 years (data on age were missing for 4%), and 3142 (85%) women were younger than 30 years. There were no registered pregnancies among women under the age of 20 years, and only 15 women were older than 35 years. Of the women, 2255 (61%) were childless, 1409 (38%) had one child, and 11 had two children before this pregnancy (parity data were missing for 22).
The cohort was easily traced in the records, and only 0.1% of pregnancy outcomes were missing from registration. There were 240 miscarriages and 312 abortions (552, 15% of total). Seventy six pregnancies (2%) ended in stillbirth and 3092 (85%) in a live birth (figure). The proportions of both stillbirths and miscarriages among second births were almost three times higher than the proportions for first births, and the proportion of abortions increased 20-fold from first to second pregnancies. Only 66% of second pregnancies ended in a live birth (table 1).
The perinatal mortality rate was 69 per 1000 births (table 2). If we counted the 30 abortions in which the gestational age was more than 28 weeks as perinatal deaths, the perinatal mortality rate would be as high as 78 per 1000. About two thirds of the perinatal deaths occurred in the early neonatal period. Both the stillbirth rate and early neonatal mortality increased with parity. The risk of a stillbirth in a second pregnancy was almost four times that for a first pregnancy, while the risk of an early neonatal death doubled.
The birth rate in the study townships was 10.3 per 1000 total population per year, 6.2 for male infants and 4.1 for females, giving a sex ratio of 152 males for 100 females. Early neonatal mortality was twice as high for female as for male infants. The sex difference in early neonatal mortality was mainly attributable to mortality in second births. Early neonatal mortality in male infants was not affected by parity, while in female infants it increased dramatically with parity, being nearly six times higher for second births than for first births (table 2). The relative risk of early neonatal mortality for girls compared with boys in the second birth was 7.15 (95% confidence interval 4.35 to 11.76), while there was no significant difference between the sexes among the first born infants (1.22, 0.76 to 1.95).
Parity did not differ by the socioeconomic status of the township (data not shown in tables). Perinatal mortality was negatively associated with the wealth of the township (table 3). The differences between townships were caused by early neonatal mortality, which was higher in townships of lower socioeconomic status, while the stillbirth rate, whether calculated with or without the late abortions, was not affected by the wealth of the township.
We have shown that routine data collected locally can yield useful information on perinatal mortality. In most developed countries, the data source for perinatal mortality is the routine vital statistics registration system. In China this is available only in urban areas, where most perinatal statistics are hospital based. The reliability of such statistics has been questioned because of under-reporting of deaths at home.9
This was the first community based cohort study in China that used data collected routinely by the family planning system at village level. The chosen data source proved effective in following up pregnancies to their outcomes, as in only three out of 3697 cases were the outcome data missing. In China, where family planning policy and its implementation are given top priority at all levels, collection of pregnancy data is also prioritised. Families have a specific incentive to report miscarriages, stillbirths, and infant deaths to the family planning system as this leads to authorisation for a new pregnancy.
The age and parity distribution of the study cohort reflected the restrictions on childbearing from marriage law and family planning policy. Most second pregnancies occurred within the regulated circumstances, and registered third pregnancies were rare.
Our data source, however, had possible biases. Although the whole cohort with a registered pregnancy was followed up, some unregistered pregnancies might have occurred, particularly if the parents managed to hide the pregnancy from the village family planning worker. Pregnancies in unmarried women were culturally unacceptable and therefore likely to be hidden and to end in abortion in the private sector.
There might also have been misclassification of cases in the registers. Though determination of fetal sex is illegal, it may occur in urban and rural areas.10 If the woman then has an abortion such pregnancies, if registered, might appear as miscarriages or stillbirths in the registers, which would perhaps partially explain the increase in the rate of miscarriages and stillbirths by parity. Pregnant women were also inclined to report a later than actual date for their last menstrual period to gain time in which to determine the sex of the fetus. Therefore, the detected stillbirth rates are probably underestimated.
However, as the village family planning worker was responsible for an average population of 1000 in a relatively small area, she would generally be aware of pregnancies among her clients. Married women staying away from their home villages for long periods of time were required to regularly mail back family planning certificates for pregnancy testing. The control system was therefore comprehensive.
Perinatal mortality in this cohort was much higher than that for urban areas in the 1980s-1990s in China.2–4 The rate in the study cohort was also higher than any reported rate from specific studies in rural areas.5–7 Studies in which calculations of infant mortality were not based on epidemiological surveys, however, have been shown to underestimate rates by more than 50%.11 In the previous interview studies on perinatal mortality, interviewees may have been reluctant to tell the investigators about late abortions, stillbirths, and deaths of infants.
According to the World Health Organization, in the late 1990s the average perinatal mortality rate in low income countries was 57 per 1000 (range 40-70 per 1000). The perinatal mortality rate in our study was higher than that reported in a case-control study in India (53 per 1000)12 and in a prospective cohort study in rural Malawi (65 per 1000, including all fetal deaths after 22 weeks' gestation).13
In several developing countries the perinatal mortality rate is higher in populations with lower socioeconomic status.12 14 We also found an inverse association between perinatal mortality and economic status of the township. Although the average income in the study townships was representative of the whole county, due to eligibility criteria for the trial the study townships might have been slightly better off in terms of access to health services. Therefore it is likely that the perinatal mortality rate would have been even higher if all townships had been included.
What is already known on this topic
Data on perinatal mortality in China rely on surveys and hospital based statistics
The perinatal mortality rate in urban China has been reported to be lower than in other developing countriesand is inversely associated with socioeconomic status
There have been few reports on perinatal mortality for rural China
What this study adds
Routine statistics collected by the Chinese familyplanning system were a reliable data source for the study of perinatal mortality
The perinatal mortality rate in rural China was muchhigher than previously reported rates from urban areas and was associated with parity in a different way than inother countries
The Chinese have a history of preferring sons, especially in rural areas.10 15 Most Chinese farmers still depend on their sons for security in old age in the absence of a pension or medical insurance. The study province implemented a modified family planning policy, allowing second pregnancies when the first born is a girl. The search to secure a son in the second pregnancy may have contributed to the high rates of abortion in second pregnancies as well as to higher neonatal mortality among girls.
In this cohort, in which most women were under 35 years of age and lived in a cultural context where smoking among women is rare, the rate of stillbirth increased strongly from first to second pregnancies, contrary to the situation in developed countries.16 This might be due to the misclassification of some abortions as stillbirths.
The higher early neonatal mortality in second born compared with first born children, particularly in girls, was probably also a result of both the family planning policy and the preference for sons. This is reflected in the high male to female sex ratio among the liveborn children in the cohort. We are currently investigating mortality by infant sex and the issue of sex ratio at birth.
We thank Duolao Wang for his helpful comments.
Contributors ZW, KV, and EH conceived and implemented the study, conducted the analysis, and wrote the manuscript. YW assisted in data analysis and writing. ZW is guarantor of the paper
Funding Academy of Finland
Competing interests None declared
Ethical approval The study was approved by the STAKES ethics committee, 11 January 1999