The importance of patient preferences in treatment decisions—challenges for doctors
BMJ 2003; 327 doi: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.327.7414.542 (Published 04 September 2003) Cite this as: BMJ 2003;327:542
Data supplement
Extra references
W1. Gillespie R, Florin D, Gillam S. Changing relationships: findings from the patient involvement project. London: King’s Fund, 2002.
W2. Coulter A. After Bristol: putting patients at the centre. BMJ 2001;324:648-51.
W3. Donabedian A. Quality assurance in health care: consumers’ role. Qual Health Care 1992;1:247-51.
W4. Kaplan S, Greenfield S, Ware JE. Assessing the effects of physician-patient interactions on the outcomes of chronic disease. Med Care 1989;27:S110-27.
W5. Greenfield S, Kaplan SH, Ware JE Jr, Yano EM, Frank HJ. Patients’ participation in medical care: effects on blood sugar control and quality of life in diabetes. J Gen Intern Med 1988;3:448-57.
W6. Fallowfield LJ, Hall A, Maguire P, Baum M, A’Hern RP. Psychological effects of being offered choice of surgery for breast cancer. BMJ 1994;309:448.
W7. Little P, Everitt H, Williamson I, Warner G, Moore M, Gould C, ET AL. Observational study of effect of patient centredness and positive approach on outcomes in general practice consultations. BMJ 2001;323:908-11.
W8. Haynes B, McKibbon KA, Kanani R. Systematic review of randomised trials of interventions to assist patients to follow prescriptions for medications. Lancet 1996;348:383-6.
W9. Royal Pharmaceutical Society of Great Britain. From compliance to concordance: towards shared goals in medicine taking. London: Royal Pharmaceutical Society, 1997.
W10. Elwyn G, Gwyn R, Edwards A, Grol R. Is ‘shared decision-making’ feasible in consultations for upper respiratory tract infections? Assessing the influence of antibiotic expectations using discourse analysis. Health Expect 1999;2:105-17.
W11. Freeman GK, Horder JP, Howie JG, Hungin AP, Hill AP, Shah NC, et al. Evolving the general practice consultation in Britain: issues of length and context. British Medical Journal, 2002. 324: p. 880-882.
W12. Blanchard CG, Labrecque MS, Ruckdeschel JC, Blanchard EB. Information and decision-making preferences of hospitalized adult cancer patients. Soc Sci Med 1988;27:1139-45.
W13. Ende J, Kazis L, Ash A, Moskowitz MA. Measuring patients' desire for autonomy: decision making and information-seeking preferences among medical patients. J Gen Intern Med 1989;4:23-30.
W14. Butow PN, Maclean M, Dunn SM, Tattersall MH, Boyer MJ. The dynamics of change: cancer patients' preferences for information, involvement and support. Ann Oncol 1997;8:857-63.
W15. Deber RB, Kraetschmer N, Irvine J. What role do patients wish to play in treatment decision making? Arch Intern Med 1996;156:1414-20.
W16. Guadagnoli E, Ward P. Patient participation in decision making. Soc Sci Med 1998;47:329-39.
W17. Kenny P, Quine S, Shiell A, Cameron S. Participation in treatment decision-making by women with early stage breast cancer. Health Expect 1999;2:159-68.
W18. Charles C, Whelan T, Gafni A, Reyno L, Redko C. Doing nothing is no choice: lay constructions of treatment decision-making among women with early-stage breast cancer. Sociol Health Illn 1998;20:71-95.
W19. McNeil BJ, Pauker SG, Sox HC Jr, Tversky A. On the elicitation of preferences for alternative therapies. N Engl J Med 1982;306:1259-62.
W20. Fuller R, Dudley N, Blacktop J. Risk communication and older people - understanding of probability and risk information by medical inpatients aged 75 years and older. Age Ageing 2001;30:473-6.
W21. Wolf PA, D’Agostino RB, Belanger AJ, Kannel WB. Probability of stroke: a risk profile from the Framingham study. Stroke 1991;22:312-8.
W22. Calman KC. Cancer: science and society and the communication of risk. BMJ 1996;313:799-802.
W23. Elwyn G, Edwards A, Eccles M, Rovner D. Decision analysis in patient care. Lancet 2001;358:571-4.
W24. Shepperd S, Charnock D, Gann B. Helping patients access high quality health information. BMJ 1999;319:764-6.
W25. Protheroe J, Fahey T, Montgomery AA, Peters TJ. The impact of patients’ preferences on the treatment of atrial fibrillation: observational study of patient based decision analysis. BMJ 2000;320:1380-4.
W26. Sculpher MJ, Watt I, Gafni A. Shared decision making in a publicly funded health care system. BMJ 1999;319:725-6.
Related articles
- This Week In The BMJ Published: 04 September 2003; BMJ 327 doi:10.1136/bmj.327.7414.0-e
- Editorial Published: 28 June 2007; BMJ 334 doi:10.1136/bmj.39246.621088.80
- Education And Debate Published: 18 September 1999; BMJ 319 doi:10.1136/bmj.319.7212.766
- Education And Debate Published: 30 January 1999; BMJ 318 doi:10.1136/bmj.318.7179.318
- Paper Published: 16 March 2002; BMJ 324 doi:10.1136/bmj.324.7338.639
- General Practice Published: 18 September 1999; BMJ 319 doi:10.1136/bmj.319.7212.753
See more
- When I use a word . . . . Medical counterfactualsBMJ May 20, 2022, 377 o1267; DOI: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.o1267
- The UK’s U-turn on obesity is a failure of leadershipBMJ May 20, 2022, 377 o1285; DOI: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.o1285
- NICE publishes guidance to increase uptake of routine vaccinationsBMJ May 20, 2022, 377 o1260; DOI: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.o1260
- 50 candidates in Royal College of Emergency Medicine exam incorrectly told they had passedBMJ May 20, 2022, 377 o1283; DOI: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.o1283
- Covid-19: JCVI advises further booster for vulnerable adults and health and care workersBMJ May 20, 2022, 377 o1277; DOI: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.o1277
Cited by...
- Unmet needs in non-metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer from the Japanese patient perspective: a discrete choice experiment
- General practitioners perceptions of best practice care at the end of life: a qualitative study
- Preferences for portable ultrasound devices: a discrete choice experiment among abdominal aortic aneurysm surveillance patients and general ultrasound patients in England
- Challenges In Understanding And Respecting Patients Preferences
- Health care experiences of people with dementia and their caregivers: a meta-ethnographic analysis of qualitative studies
- Shared Decision Making in Oncology Practice: What Do Oncologists Need to Know?
- Helping pregnant women make better decisions: a systematic review of the benefits of patient decision aids in obstetrics
- The Patients Preferences Questionnaire for Angina treatment: results and psychometrics from 383 patients in primary care in England
- Are patients receiving enough information about healthcare rationing? A qualitative study
- Physician-Identified Factors Affecting Patient Participation in Reaching Treatment Decisions
- Involving patients in the BMJ
- Evaluation and ethical review of a tool to explore patient preferences for information and involvement in decision making.
- Learning to Cope: How Far Is Too Close?
- Managing controversy through consultation: a qualitative study of communication and trust around MMR vaccination decisions
- Treatment preferences of opiate-dependent patients
- Prescribing and taking medicines
- "Doc, tell me what I need to know"--a doctor's perspective
- The role of risk communication in shared decision making