Average energy intake among pregnant women carrying a boy compared with a girlBMJ 2003; 326 doi: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.326.7401.1245 (Published 05 June 2003) Cite this as: BMJ 2003;326:1245
- Rulla M Tamimi, doctoral student1,
- Pagona Lagiou, assistant professor2,
- Lorelei A Mucci, postdoctoral fellow4,
- Chung-Cheng Hsieh, professor3,
- Hans-Olov Adami, professor4,
- Dimitrios Trichopoulos (), professor1
- 1 Department of Epidemiology, Harvard School of Public Health, Boston, MA 02115, USA,
- 2 Department of Hygiene and Epidemiology, School of Medicine, University of Athens, GR-11527, Athens, Greece,
- 3 University of Massachusetts Cancer Center, Worcester, MA01655, USA,
- 4 Department of Medical Epidemiology, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, SE-171 77, Sweden
- Correspondence D Trichopoulos
The birth weight of boys is about 100 g heavier than the birth weight of girls, and this seems to be consistent across populations. No study, has examined whether the difference is because the pregnant woman has a higher energy intake or more efficient energy utilisation if she is carrying a male embryo than if she is carrying a female embryo. We report data to support the first hypothesis—that the pregnant woman carrying a boy has a higher energy intake.
Participants, methods, and results
We analysed data from an international prospective study on dietary and non-dietary predictors of pregnancy hormones and outcomes among women in Boston, United States, and Shanghai, China.1 Because the database of nutrients for the Chinese diet is incomplete, we present data on dietary intakes for the US women only.
Between March 1994 and October 1995, we identified 402 eligible pregnant women during their first routine prenatal visit at the Beth Israel Hospital in Boston and invited them to participate in the study. We followed throughout their pregnancies the 304 women who consented and did not have an early pregnancy termination or twin birth. The study population, study design, and methods have been described.1
We assessed dietary intake during the second trimester by using an extensive questionnaire on the frequency of eating, which is identical to the one used and validated in the nurses' health study.2 Trained interviewers checked the questionnaire for accuracy and completeness before we mailed it to the women one week before their second prenatal visit (around 27 weeks' gestation). We calculated intake of energy and energy generating nutrients from the data on dietary intake, using standard software.3 The analysis included 244 pregnant women with adequate covariate and dietary data.
We followed simple cross tabulations and modelled the data through multiple linear regression. The sex of the embryo was our main interest and dependent variables, one at a time, were intakes of energy, animal lipids, vegetable lipids, carbohydrates, and proteins.
Women who were carrying a male embryo had a higher daily energy intake than women who were carrying a female embryo (mean 9025.6 (SE=369.6) kJ v 8258.6 (227.2) kJ). After adjustment for potentially confounding covariates indicated in the table, the difference was 796.2 kJ (P=0.049), or 9.6%. We did not observe any effect of sex of the fetus on maternal weight gain, even though weight gain is positively associated with birth weight. Pre-eclampsia, emesis gravidarum, tobacco smoking, and alcohol drinking during pregnancy were not confounders of this relation.
Women carrying male rather than female fetuses had an 8.0% higher intake of protein, a 9.2% higher intake of carbohydrates, a 10.9% higher intake of lipids of animal origin, and a 14.9% higher intake of lipids of vegetable origin. There is no significant heterogeneity among these higher intakes, even though higher intakes tend to be concentrated in the energy dense lipids.
The energy intake of pregnant women is about 10% higher when they are carrying a boy rather than a girl. Our findings support the hypothesis that women carrying male rather than female embryos may have higher energy requirements and that male embryos may be more susceptible to energy restriction.4 Although marginally significant, the difference in energy intake between pregnant women carrying boys rather than girls is not trivial—modelling the data through logistic regression indicates that the odds of having a boy rather than a girl is higher by about 35% when maternal energy intake is higher by about one standard deviation. The signal from the fetus responsible for the higher energy intake of women carrying a boy could be related to the strongly anabolic testosterone secreted by the fetal testicles,5 but other alternatives deserve scientific investigation.
Pregnant women carrying boys have a 10% higher energy intake than those carrying girls
Contributors RT, PL, and LM performed the study. The original international study was conceived by CcH, H-OA, and DT, who also provided input in the statistical analysis. All authors contributed to the interpretation of the results and the preparation of the manuscript. DT is the guarantor for the data.
Funding This study was supported in part by grant no CA54220 from the National Institutes of Health. The funding source approved the original study but had no further involvement in the present investigation.
Competing interests None declared.
Ethical approval The study was in accordance with the ethical standards for human experimentation established by the Institutional Review Boards of the Harvard School of Public Health and Beth Israel Hospital.