Medical students should not be forced to study all subjects
BMJ 2002; 325 doi: https://doi.org/10.1136/sbmj.0209349a (Published 01 September 2002) Cite this as: BMJ 2002;325:0209349a- Kallur Suresh, specialist registrar1
- 1Department of Psychological Medicine, William Harvey House, St Bartholomews Hospital, London EC1A 7BE
I was a medical student between 1986 and 1991. It took me six long years to qualify as a doctor. During those years, I was forced to study many subjects—anatomy, physiology, biochemistry, pharmacology, pathology, microbiology, forensic medicine, ENT, ophthalmology, public health medicine, internal medicine, neurology, paediatrics, dentistry, anaesthetics, psychiatry, general surgery, orthopaedics, urology, dermatology and venereology, obstetrics and gynaecology … the list goes on.
We were expected to know about each specialty in some detail. We read elaborate textbooks about the common (and uncommon) diseases in each, their clinical presentations, and their treatments and prognoses. It didnt seem so strange at the time, probably because everyone was doing it. There was an air of inevitability about it. Yet we forgot most of the intricate details a few days after the exams.
But why?
Now, more than a decade down the line and having chosen psychiatry as my career, it seems like …
Log in
Log in using your username and password
Log in through your institution
Subscribe from £184 *
Subscribe and get access to all BMJ articles, and much more.
* For online subscription
Access this article for 1 day for:
£50 / $60/ €56 (excludes VAT)
You can download a PDF version for your personal record.