Letters Peer review of statistics in medical research BMJ 2002; 325 doi: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.325.7362.491/a (Published 31 August 2002) Cite this as: BMJ 2002;325:491 Article Related content Metrics Responses Peer review Related articles Editor's Choice The way we work now Published: 31 August 2002; BMJ 325 doi:10.1136/bmj.325.7362.0/g Education And Debate Peer review of statistics in medical research: the other problem Published: 25 May 2002; BMJ 324 doi:10.1136/bmj.324.7348.1271 See more Trump chooses Obamacare opponent to lead Health and Human Services BMJ November 30, 2016, 355 i6469; DOI: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.i6469 Drug firms need to tackle affordability BMJ November 14, 2016, 355 i6096; DOI: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.i6096 World Medical Association’s tainted president, Ketan Desai BMJ November 10, 2016, 355 i5867; DOI: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.i5867 Cancer drugs, survival, and ethics BMJ November 09, 2016, 355 i5792; DOI: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.i5792 WHO refers $29m Oxford research project to GMC for misconduct BMJ November 07, 2016, 355 i5971; DOI: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.i5971 Cited by... Recruitment of doctors to non-standard grades in the NHS: analysis of job advertisements and survey of advertisersAbstract Fulltext PDF Power is indeed irrelevant in interpreting completed studiesAbstract Fulltext PDF
