New outbreak of legionnaires' disease in the United Kingdom
BMJ 2002; 325 doi: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.325.7360.347 (Published 17 August 2002) Cite this as: BMJ 2002;325:347All rapid responses
Rapid responses are electronic comments to the editor. They enable our users to debate issues raised in articles published on bmj.com. A rapid response is first posted online. If you need the URL (web address) of an individual response, simply click on the response headline and copy the URL from the browser window. A proportion of responses will, after editing, be published online and in the print journal as letters, which are indexed in PubMed. Rapid responses are not indexed in PubMed and they are not journal articles. The BMJ reserves the right to remove responses which are being wilfully misrepresented as published articles or when it is brought to our attention that a response spreads misinformation.
From March 2022, the word limit for rapid responses will be 600 words not including references and author details. We will no longer post responses that exceed this limit.
The word limit for letters selected from posted responses remains 300 words.
Editor,
Carol Joseph’s editorial underlines the paradox of larger outbreaks
of Legionnaires’ disease in an era when understanding of the causal chain
is greater than ever[1]. She points to four explanations - loss of
vigilance in maintenance of complex water systems, greater clinical
awareness, better surveillance and easier diagnosis uncovering non-
pneumonic disease. She calls for enhanced surveillance with attention to
both sporadic and Legionnaires’ disease, and greater vigilance in control.
Some lessons from studies of Legionnaires’ disease in Scotland remain
highly pertinent to current concerns, fuelled by two outbreaks in England
this summer.
In Glasgow, following two outbreaks, including the largest in the UK
up to 1984[2], a survey of cooling tower maintenance in 1985 showed
difficulties in maintaining an accurate register of cooling towers, poor
understanding among some managers of premises about the nature and
location of cooling towers and evaporative condensers, and breaches of
guidelines usually on structural issues, e.g. control of cooling tower
drift, rather than non-use of chemicals[3]. The problems would surely have
been even greater without the publicity of the preceding outbreaks.
Breaches of guidelines on the maintenance of hot water systems were also
of concern, and comprised a hazard for Legionnaires’ disease[4].
Apparently ‘sporadic’ cases were often, on careful review, part of
mini-clusters[5]. The inevitable conclusion, anticipating that of Joseph1,
was that surveillance needed strengthening, and that solitary cases needed
investigation promptly for potential early warning of an outbreak. Sadly,
information vital to surveillance - address, postcode and date of onset -
was often missing from laboratory request forms, which are an important
component of surveillance[6]. Clinicians must understand why such
information is needed so they are motivated to provide it.
Studies of sporadic disease suggested the sources of infection were
similar to those for outbreaks, for the epidemiological patterns were
similar[7], with proximity of the home to a cooling tower being a risk
factor[8].
The costs of maintaining water systems, both financially and in terms
of environmental contamination are high, so choices need to be made.
Preliminary economic analysis showed the emphasis needs to be placed on
cooling tower maintenance rather than domestic water systems[9], but much
more work is needed on this matter.
Despite our knowledge, elimination of Legionnaires’ disease is a
formidable task[10,11] so eternal vigilance combined with a balanced
response based on an understanding of costs and benefits is required -
neither panic nor media pressure can be allowed to drive priorities.
These lessons based on studies in the 1980’s, published in the 1990’s,
remain relevant to understanding and controlling the outbreaks that are
now gripping the nation.
1. Joseph C. New outbreak of Legionnaires' disease in the United
Kingdom. BMJ 2002; 325:347-348
2. Ad-hoc Committee Legionellosis - a combined study of a community
outbreak. Lancet 1986;ii:380-382
3. Bhopal R S, Barr G. Maintenance of cooling towers following two
outbreaks of Legionnaires' disease in a city. Epidemiol Infect 1990;104:29
-38
4. Bhopal R S, Barr G. Are hot and cold water systems maintained in
accord with published guidelines? A preliminary answer. Health and Hygiene
1991;12:159-165
5. Bhopal R S, Diggle P, Rowlingson B. Pinpointing clusters of
apparently sporadic Legionnaires' disease. Br Med J 1992;304:1022-1027
6. Bhopal R S. Surveillance of disease and information on laboratory
request forms: the example of Legionnaires' disease. Journal of Infection
1991;22:97-98
7. Bhopal R S, Fallon R J. Variations in time and space of non-
outbreak Legionnaires' disease in Scotland. Epidemiol Infect 1991;104:29-
38
8. Bhopal R S, Fallon R J, Buist E C, Black R J, Urquart J D.
Proximity of the home to a cooling tower and the risk of non-outbreak
Legionnaires' disease. Br Med J 1991;302:378-383
9. Smith K R, Parkin D W, Bhopal R S. Costs and benefits of
preventing Legionnaires' disease by maintenance of cooling towers and hot
water systems. J Epidemiol Community Health 1993;47:402
10. Bhopal R S, Wagstaff R. Prospects for the elimination of
Legionnaires' disease. J Infect 1993;26:239-243
11. Bhopal R S. Source of infection for sporadic Legionnaires'
disease. J Infect l995:30:9-12
Competing interests: No competing interests
Sir,
Re: New outbreak of Legionnaires’ disease in the United Kingdom A
wake up call for continued vigilance
We write in response to the recent editorial regarding the outbreak
of legionella pneumonia in Cumbria [1]. The sudden influx of around 92
patients with 19 ICU admissions is a significant strain on any health
service.
The number of reported cases of legionella in the UK has increased
steadily from 147 in 1993 to 226 in 1998 [2,3]. As the author suggests,
Legionnaires disease is often underdiagnosed, and sporadic, with only the
very severely ill patients being detected and reported. The most
seriously affected patients develop fulminant respiratory and multi-system
failure, and this is the main cause for death for the 10-15% who die[1,4].
We have used extra-corporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) in 16 adult
patients with the most severe form of legionella between 1989 and 2001.
Their modal pre-ECMO PaO2/FIO2 ratio was 8.7 Kpa ( range 4.1 to 27.1
Kpa), 13 were male, and mean age was 43 years (SD=10.6). They all received
veno-venous ECMO for a mean time of 258 hours (SD=235 hours). Survival to
hospital discharge was 69%, with 11/16 patients surviving at 6 months.
This is similar to the 66% survival that we have reported for adult
patients with a variety of respiratory diagnoses [5].
All adult ECMO in the UK now falls within the remit of the CESAR
Trial (http://www.cesar-trial.org). To be eligible for the trial, patients
must be between 18 and 65 years old, have a Murray Lung Injury Score of
> 3.0 and have a duration of high pressure/high FIO2 ventilation of
<7 days. We recommend that any patients with severe legionella who
are deteriorating despite optimal conventional intensive care should be
considered for the CESAR trial. Further details are available on the
website at http://www.cesar-trial.org.
Sincerely,
N Jones,
CESAR Trial Research Fellow,
ECMO Dept,
Glenfield Hospital,
Leicester LE3 9QP
Tel: 0116 287 1471
Fax: 0116 250 2374
E-mail: nikki.jones@uhl-tr.nhs.uk
G J Peek,
Lecturer in Cardiac Surgery
ECMO Dept,
Glenfield Hospital,
Leicester LE3 9QP
N Roberts,
ECMO Fellow,
ECMO Dept,
Glenfield Hospital,
Leicester LE3 9QP
C Harvey,
ECMO Fellow,
ECMO Dept,
Glenfield Hospital,
Leicester LE3 9QP
D Jenkins,
Consultant in Microbiology,
Microbiology Dept,
Leicester General Hospital,
Leicester
AW Sosnowski,
Consultant Cardiac Surgeon,
Cardiothoracic Dept,
Glenfield Hospital,
Leicester LE3 9QP
HM Killer,
Head of Cardiac Services,
Glenfield Hospital,
Leicester LE3 9QP
RK Firmin,
Director of Cardiac Surgery and ECMO,
ECMO Dept,
Glenfield Hospital,
Leicester LE3 9QP
A Truesdale,
Trials Co-ordinator,
London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine,
Keppel Street,
London WC1E 7HT
D Elbourne,
Professor of Health Care Evaluation
Medical Statistics Unit
London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine
Keppel Street
London WC1E 7HT
References:
1. Joseph C. New outbreak of Legionnaires’ disease in the United Kingdom A
wake up call for continued vigilance. BMJ 2002 Aug; 325(17):347-348.
2. Joseph CA, Dedman D, Birtles R, Watson JM, Bartlett CL. Legionnaires’
disease surveillance: England and Wales 1993. Commun Dis Rep CDR Rev 1994
Sep 16; 4 (10): R109-11
3. Joseph Ca, Harrison TG, Ilijic-Car D, Bartlett CL. Legionnaires’
disease surveillance: England and Wales 1998. Commun Dis Public Health
1999 Dec; 2 (4): 280-4.
4. Van Riemsdijk-van Overbeeke IC, van den Berg B. Severe Legionnaires’
disease requiring intensive care treatment. Neth J Med 1996 Nov; 49 (5):
196-201.
5. Peek GJ, Moore HM, Moore N, Sosnowski AW, Firmin RK. Extracorporeal
membrane oxygenation for adult respiratory failure. Chest 1997 Sep; 112
(3): 759-64.
Competing interests: No competing interests
A large outbreak of legionnaires' disease in Japan
I have already reported the large outbreak of legionnaires' disease
in Japan [1]. After reading the editorial by Joseph [2], I would like to
add new information. According to the latest official announcement by
Hyuga City, 294 (158 men and 136 women) became ill (29 confirmed and 265
probable cases) and six people (four men and two women over 60 years old)
had died. All had visited the same hot-spring resort in Hyuga City and had
been bathing in contaminated spas with Legionella pneumophila. It was
revealed that the facility had not followed health ministry cleaning and
disinfection procedures in spa and public bath facilities.
Most Japanese are fond of hot-spring bathing, but substandard
cleaning methods at spa and public bath facilities nationwide are putting
patrons at risk from potentially lethal microorganisms [3]. Scientists of
the National Institute of Infectious Diseases found amoebas at 151 (64%)
of the 237 facilities they tested. In 2000, there was another large
outbreak of legionnaires' disease at a municipal public bath in Ishioka
City in Ibaragi Prefecture. Three people had died and 42 other people had
been diagnosed as the disease. The facility had seldom exchanged re-
circulated hot water of the public bath. The importance of following
ministry-established cleaning and disinfection procedures to the letter
should be emphasized.
References
1. Kawane H. Outbreak of legionnaires' disease in Japan.
bmj.com/cgi/eletters/325/7359/295/a, 27 Aug 2002.
2. Joseph C. New outbreak of legionnaires' disease in the United Kingdom.
BMJ 2002;325:347-348. (17 August.)
3. Anon. Report:Onsen hygiene lacking. IHT/Asahi 16 August 2002.
Competing interests: No competing interests